Episode 45

Mormon Prophet Russell M. Nelson's Teachings on Doubts

Original Air Date: 2023-09-15

Russell M. NelsonDoubtLazy Learners

This detailed summary covers the content of the Mormon Stories Podcast episode titled "Mormon Prophet, Russell M. Nelson's Teachings on Doubts," featuring host John Dehlin and guests Mike (from LDS Discussions) and Nemo the Mormon. The discussion analyzes specific addresses given by LDS Church President Russell M. Nelson and Church Historian Kyle McKay regarding how members should navigate doubt and historical inquiries.

Part 1: President Russell M. Nelson’s Teachings on Doubt

The first half of the discussion focuses on a 2021 General Conference talk by President Nelson, where he outlines how members should handle wavering faith. The panel critiques several specific arguments made by the prophet:

  • 1. "Lazy Learners and Lax Disciples"Nelson characterizes those who struggle to muster faith as "lazy learners and lax disciples" 1. The hosts argue this label is one of the most offensive and dishonest claims made in the modern era, as it attempts to dismiss the genuine labor and research undertaken by those who leave the church 1. Data suggests that those who lose their faith often have higher-than-average education and were deeply involved in high-level church callings, contradicting the idea that they are lazy 2. The panel views this rhetoric as a tactic to "poison the well," turning believing members against those who question 1, 3.
  • 2. "Choose to Believe" and Avoid "Rehearsing Doubts"Nelson advises members to "choose to believe" and to stop increasing their doubts by discussing them with other doubters 4. He instructs members to take questions only to the Lord and "faithful sources" 4.
  • The Car Dealership Analogy: Mike compares this logic to a car dealership that sold a defective vehicle. If a salesperson told a customer, "Choose to believe this car is good," and "Don't look at the negative reviews or talk to other unhappy customers," the customer would immediately recognize it as a scam 5.
  • Information Control: The panel notes that high-demand religions and cults use this tactic to prevent members from associating with critics or critically examining truth claims 6, 7.
  • 3. The Redefinition of FaithNelson claims that skeptics overlook "the power of faith," but the hosts argue he is redefining faith 8. While the Book of Mormon defines faith as hoping for things which are not seen but are true, the modern church expects members to maintain faith in spite of tangible evidence proving the claims false (such as the translation of the Book of Abraham) 9, 10.
  • 4. The Appeal to Martyrdom (Sunk Cost Fallacy)Nelson asks whether Joseph Smith and Hyrum Smith would have died for the church if they didn't know it was true, and references the 2,000 pioneers who died on the trail 11.

  • Counter-arguments: The hosts point out that people die for false beliefs frequently, citing the 909 deaths at Jonestown and the Heaven's Gate suicides 12, 13. Martyrdom proves sincerity of belief, not the factual truth of the belief 12. Furthermore, Joseph Smith did not go willingly to his death as a "lamb to the slaughter" but attempted to escape and defend himself 14.
  • 5. The Rain Story (Unfalsifiable Logic)Nelson recounts visiting the Pacific Islands where prayers stopped the rain in Fiji and Samoa, but not in Tahiti 15. He states that it takes faith to stop the rain, but also faith to persevere when the rain does not stop 16. The panel describes this as "heads I win, tails you lose" theology; whether the prayer is answered or not, the church claims it as a victory for faith, rendering the concept of prayer's efficacy meaningless 16, 17.

    Part 2: Church Historian Kyle McKay’s Address

    The second half of the episode analyzes a 2023 address by Church Historian Kyle McKay to students at BYU-Idaho. The panel finds this talk particularly revealing because McKay, a lawyer by trade, admits to the validity of doubts while simultaneously discouraging the search for answers.

  • 1. Admission of "Compelling Reasons to Doubt"McKay explicitly admits there are "compelling reasons to doubt" the church 18.
  • Significance: The hosts highlight that "compelling" means "convincing" or "forceful" 19. This is a rare admission from a church official that the arguments against the church’s truth claims are legitimate and based on evidence, though he refuses to list what those specific reasons are 20, 21.
  • 2. Attributing Doubt to SatanMcKay suggests that because Satan can appear as an "angel of light," he provides these compelling reasons to doubt 22.
  • Critique: The panel condemns this as emotional manipulation and fearmongering, a common cult tactic known as the "BITE model" (specifically Emotional control) 23, 24. By associating critical thinking with Satan, the church attempts to terrify young adults into compliance 23. Mike notes the irony of blaming Satan for problems actually caused by Joseph Smith's behavior and the church's own history 25.
  • 3. "Finding Answers... Is Not the Solution"In a statement the panel finds anti-intellectual, McKay tells the university students that "finding answers to these perplexing questions ultimately is not the solution" 26.
  • Critique: The hosts argue this is an explicit admission that the church has no answers 27. Telling college students that research and finding answers is not the solution is an attempt to stop critical thinking and foster dependency on the institution 28, 29.
  • 4. Don't Scrutinize LeadersMcKay discourages studying the "errors of man" (referring to church leaders) to find the truths of God 30.

  • Critique: The panel argues that labeling systemic frauds (like the Book of Abraham translation, polygamy with teenagers, and financial deception) as mere "mistakes" is disingenuous 31. They contend that these are not personal imperfections but fatal flaws in the church's foundational truth claims 32.
  • Summary of Key Themes and Conclusions

  • Lawyers as Historians: The hosts note that the church consistently hires lawyers (like McKay) rather than professional historians to lead the history department. Lawyers are trained to defend a client and argue a side, whereas historians seek objective truth 33, 34.
  • The BITE Model: The discussion frequently references Stephen Hassan’s BITE model (Behavior, Information, Thought, and Emotional control) to explain how the church retains members 29. By controlling information and framing doubt as evil, the church restricts the "agency" of its members 35.
  • The Failure of Apologetics: The survey mentioned at the end reveals that the Church’s own "Gospel Topics Essays" constitute a leading cause of faith crises, tied with the "CES Letter" 36. This indicates that when the church is forced to be honest about its history, the narrative falls apart 37.
  • Analogy to solidify understanding:

    The panel concludes that the church's approach to doubt is akin to a magician performing a trick. A magician relies on perspective; if the audience could see the trick from the magician's angle (the raw historical facts), the illusion (the church's truth claims) would vanish. Therefore, leaders like Nelson and McKay must tell the audience not to move, not to look behind the curtain, and not to listen to anyone who explains how the trick works 38.

    Episode Info

    Guests: Mike (LDS Discussions), Nemo the Mormon

    Related Article: LDS Discussions