Episode 38

Problematic Mormon Revelations after Joseph Smith

Original Air Date: 2023-03-30

Post-Joseph Revelations1978 RevelationManifestos

This episode of the LDS Discussions series on the Mormon Stories Podcast examines the nature of revelation and prophecy within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) following the death of Joseph Smith. The hosts, John Dehlin, Mike (from LDS Discussions), and Nemo the Mormon, analyze whether modern prophets possess the same connection to the divine claimed by Smith, or if their "revelations" are actually administrative decisions driven by personal worldviews and external pressure.

Here is a detailed summary of the video’s key arguments and historical examples:

The "Unleashed" Prophet: Revelation as Personal Agenda

The episode frames much of its discussion around a quote by Wendy Nelson regarding her husband, President Russell M. Nelson. She described him as being "unleashed" upon becoming prophet, finally free to do the things he had been "concerned about but could never do" when he was merely an apostle 1.

  • The Implication: The hosts argue this suggests that becoming a prophet does not mean receiving new communication from God, but rather gaining the administrative power to enforce one's long-held personal opinions and worldviews 2.
  • The Pattern: This quote is used throughout the episode to explain why prophets often reverse the policies of their predecessors—they are implementing their own preferences rather than conveying an unchangeable divine will 3, 4.
  • Contradictory Revelations and Reversals

    The panel examines several historical instances where "revelations" were declared usually in the voice of God or as absolute doctrine, only to be reversed by subsequent leaders.

  • 1. John Taylor’s 1886 Revelation on Polygamy
  • The Revelation: In 1886, while in hiding, President John Taylor recorded a revelation in the voice of God. It explicitly stated that the "New and Everlasting Covenant" (polygamy) could not be revoked because God is everlasting 5. It commanded that the practice must continue despite legal pressure 6.
  • The Reversal: Less than four years later, in 1890, the practice was publicly revoked by the next prophet (Wilford Woodruff) via the Manifesto 7.
  • Significance: This demonstrates a conflict where an "unchangeable God" seemingly changed His mind rapidly due to political pressure, or that one prophet's "revelation" was simply his own refusal to yield 7.
  • 2. The Lifting of the Priesthood Ban (1978)
  • The Official Narrative: The church portrays the 1978 decision to allow Black members to hold the priesthood as a miraculous, pentecostal experience 8.
  • The "Sausage Making": The hosts contrast this with an interview given by Apostle LeGrand Richards. Richards described the process as a practical administrative meeting where President Spencer W. Kimball asked for input, drafted a statement, and secured a vote 9, 10.
  • Motivation: The change was largely driven by the practical need to staff the new temple in Brazil, where many faithful members had African ancestry 11, 12. The hosts argue this was a policy change based on expediency rather than a sudden communication from God 13.
  • 3. The Exclusion Policy (2015) and its Reversal (2019)
  • The Policy: In November 2015, a policy was leaked that labeled those in same-sex marriages as apostates and barred their children from baptism until age 18 14.
  • Claim of Revelation: Months later, Russell M. Nelson (then an apostle) declared this policy was the result of the Lord moving upon the prophet, calling it a "revelation from the Lord" 15.
  • The Reversal: In 2019, after massive backlash and resignations, the policy was reversed. This reversal was also attributed to seeking "the will of the Lord" 16.
  • Critique: The hosts argue that God would not institute a policy that caused significant harm to families only to reverse it three years later. They suggest this proves leaders attribute their own administrative blunders to God until public pressure forces a change 17, 18.
  • The "Mormon" Name Controversy

    The episode highlights a direct theological conflict between two modern prophets regarding the church's nickname.

  • Gordon B. Hinckley (1990): President Hinckley taught that "Mormon" means "more good" and that while it is a nickname, it is honorable. He effectively dismissed concerns about the name, quoting the adage, "Solomon said it couldn't be done so why even try" regarding correcting the public 19, 20. Under President Monson, the church spent millions on the "I’m a Mormon" and "Meet the Mormons" campaigns 21.
  • Russell M. Nelson (2018): Conversely, President Nelson declared that using the nickname "Mormon" is a "major victory for Satan" and that it offends Jesus Christ 22.
  • Conclusion: The hosts note that Nelson held this view in 1990 (when Hinckley publicly corrected him), and he only implemented it as doctrine once he became the "boss," further validating the "unleashed" theory 23, 24.
  • Changes to the Temple Ceremony

    The hosts discuss how the temple endowment ceremony has been altered significantly over time, despite Brigham Young’s claim that he had "perfected" the ceremony 25.

  • The Changes: Modifications include the removal of "blood penalties" (mimicking suicide), the removal of the "Adam-God" doctrine, and recent changes reducing sexism (such as women hearkening to husbands) 26, 27.
  • The Contradiction: Church leaders previously taught that changing ordinances was a sign of apostasy and that ancient churches changed them to "suit the convenience of men" 28. The hosts argue the LDS Church has done exactly that—altering ceremonies to reduce member discomfort 27.
  • The Failure of Discernment

    A major portion of the episode attacks the concept of discernment—the claim that church leaders can detect evil or deception through the Holy Ghost.

  • The Kinderhook Plates: Joseph Smith and subsequent leaders (like Mark E. Petersen) believed these forged plates were ancient records. The church defended their authenticity until science proved them a hoax in 1980 29.
  • Mark Hofmann: The leadership (including Hinckley and Oaks) was deceived by master forger and bomber Mark Hofmann. They purchased documents from him to hide them from the public 30.
  • Dallin H. Oaks: The hosts point out the irony that Dallin H. Oaks, who met with Hofmann hours after Hofmann committed murder without detecting anything wrong 31, later gave a talk asserting that one can avoid deception by keeping commandments 32.
  • The Takeaway: If prophets cannot discern a murderer or a fraud in their midst, the "gift of discernment" is functionally non-existent 33.
  • Summary

    The episode concludes that since the time of Joseph Smith, the "grand revelation" of Mormonism has been watered down to "impressions" and corporate consensus 34. The hosts argue that modern prophets consistently lag behind societal moral progress (civil rights, women's rights, LGBTQ+ rights) rather than leading it 35. Ultimately, if a prophet cannot distinguish between their own personal worldview and the will of God, their claim to authority is fundamentally compromised 36.

    Episode Info

    Guests: Mike (LDS Discussions), Nemo the Mormon

    Related Article: LDS Discussions