BYU Professor Brings CES Letter To Life
Original Air Date: 2025-01-21 • Duration: 2h 36m
This video is an episode of the Mormon Stories Podcast (LDS Discussions Edition) featuring host John Dehlin alongside contributors Julia ("Analyzing Mormonism") and Nemo the Mormon 1, 2. The episode focuses on the artwork of Anthony Sweat, a BYU Professor of Church History and Doctrine, whose paintings depict controversial historical events that the LDS Church previously ignored, denied, or hid 1, 3. The central premise of the discussion is that Sweat’s academic and artistic work effectively validates the critical claims made by Jeremy Runnells in the CES Letter, a document for which Runnells was previously attacked and excommunicated 1, 4, 5.
Historical Context and artistic Evolution
The hosts begin by establishing that for decades, the LDS Church commissioned and displayed artwork that presented a sanitized, historically inaccurate version of its origins, such as Joseph Smith translating with his finger on gold plates 6, 7. Accurate depictions of history—such as Joseph Smith using a stone in a hat—were previously the domain of critics, such as Grant Palmer, or satirical portrayals like the 2003 South Park episode on Mormonism 8, 9. Julia notes that while the CES Letter was published in 2013, Anthony Sweat began publishing his corrective artwork around 2014, suggesting the Church was forced to address these historical issues due to the pressure created by truthful internet discourse 10.
Comparison: Anthony Sweat’s Art vs. The CES Letter
The bulk of the video compares specific paintings by Sweat against excerpts from the CES Letter, showing a direct correlation between Runnells' accusations and Sweat’s faithful admissions.
4. Race and the Priesthood
5. The Nauvoo Expositor
The "Victim Blaming" Critique
A recurring theme in the video is the hosts' frustration with how Anthony Sweat frames these revelations. Sweat argues that these images look "odd" or "strange" to modern eyes due to "presentism," suggesting the difficulty lies in the cultural gap between the 19th and 21st centuries 26. The hosts reject this, noting that treasure digging and polygamy were illegal and considered "odd" even in the 1800s 27.
Furthermore, the hosts criticize Sweat for suggesting that students struggle with this art because their perceptions were altered by previous art, effectively blaming the members for being deceived 28. Nemo argues that the Church bears the responsibility for commissioning and publishing deceptive art for decades, not the members for believing it 29.
Conclusion and Vindication
The video concludes with a sense of vindication for the CES Letter. The hosts find it outrageous that Jeremy Runnells was labeled an apostate for publishing historical facts that a faithful BYU professor is now celebrated for depicting in art 5. They argue that the Church has been forced to "come clean" solely because truthful information on the internet made the old, sanitized narrative unsustainable 30.
Additionally, John Dehlin reveals that the apologetic website "cesletters.org"—which had mimicked Runnells' domain to divert traffic to apologetic content—has capitulated and rebranded to "Study in Faith," signaling a victory for the visibility and credibility of the CES Letter 31.
To put it in perspective, the video suggests the LDS Church is currently in a position similar to a company that fired a whistleblower for exposing safety violations, only to later hire a consultant to fix those exact violations while pretending the whistleblower never existed.
Condensed ~5 minute video overview of the full episode, AI-generated by NotebookLM.
Condensed podcast-style audio overview of the full episode, AI-generated by NotebookLM.
AI-generated slideshow powered by NotebookLM (multi-page PDF)
AI-generated infographic powered by NotebookLM (single-page PDF)
hello everyone and welcome to another edition of warmer Stories podcast LDS discussions Edition I'm John delin one of your hosts for today it is January 16 2025 and today we are covering uh here's the thumbnail BYU professor art brings CES letter to life and Julia remind me is the name of that guy Anthony sweat is that his name yeah sweat Anthony sweat yeah okay yeah so uh the short the short version is there's a BYU professor who I think he's both an artist and a religion Professor if I'm not mistaken yes his name is Anthony sweat and he has painted a bunch of images of the LDS restoration that uh are actually uh Renditions of uh aspects of Mormon church history that for I don't know 150 200 years the Mormon church has actively SED to deny or avoid talking about and um and uh we stumbled upon his artwork at some point last year I believe and uh we thought it was really fun to acknowledge that uh a lot of his art basically confirms what Jeremy rynolds published in his famous PDF called a letter to a CES director that can be found at ces.org and and because in the past year uh the the Mormon church apologists have started attacking Jeremy trying to undermine his credibility trying to undermine uh The credibility CES letter we uh have been committed this year to advertising and promoting the CES letter as much as possible if for no other reason than that we're sick of uh Mormon apologists smearing sincere critics um and going to you know fight back against that um this is part of the LDS discussion series we're very proud uh to be continuing that series for those of you who don't know uh a couple years ago we started based on a a really awesome website called LDS discussions we uh brought in the author of that website and of a bunch of essays he goes by the name of Mike he's now retired but we did 50 fiveish episodes covering all of the different essays that uh Mike wrote on his LDS discussions episode um they're kind of historic and uh we did it with Nemo uh the Mormon and Julia you appeared on many of those episodes and of course Mike himself appeared as well occasionally we would have a special guest but the whole stick was to do our best to uh discover or to explore Mormon church truth claims as objectively and as neutrally and as dispassionately as possible and as many of our viewers and listeners have noted sometimes we were better than others at being dispassionate and neutral but what I've been told is that LDS discussion series is one of the most important things Mormon stories has ever done and uh having uh coming back on uh Mormon stories podcast LDS discussions uh Edition to uh to join us in today's episode is Julia hey Julia welcome hi Julia you are the uh you're the Tik tocker known as analyzing Mormonism is that right uh yeah for as long as Tik tok's around yeah and of course you help us with production uh on Mormon stories as well thanks for joining us today Julia yeah of course and Nemo we've got Nemo the Mormon back from the Nemo the Mormon YouTube channel hey Nemo hi uh I used to be the token active member of the church on the discussion didn't I uh and I I I heard people's comments I've heard what you have to say about the fact that we weren't particularly dispassionate um in some of our previous episodes so I'm going to bring with me Mike's energy of um being dead inside um and yeah thanks for having me John all right you know a couple things I'll just address really quickly um one is this idea that we're not as objective we should stop saying we're trying to be objective because we're clearly not and I'll just agree uh when we started out the series we we really wanted to try and keep an objective tone and I do think the evidence that we provided was objective and I think we we' I think our intellectual analysis was fair um or at least the most fair thing out there on the internet certainly Fair than any apologetic resource out there um certainly more fair than many of the even X Morman podcasts but I I will acknowledge that we uh that you know I think we yeah that we're we're not as objective as we could be I will defend us though and just say the LDS discussion series is probably the most fair and balanced analysis of Mormon church truth claims in a series for a podcast on the internet but also one of the reasons why we're continuing to release episodes in this uh series is uh because there's a lot that we didn't cover but also every time we do an LDS discussions episode we're promoting the past series and you know we all know that like people recycle on the internet and every month there's a brand new set of people joining Mormon stories that are brand new to the questions and have never heard of the LDS discussion Series so those of you who love the LDS D discussion series you should want us to continually be releasing new episodes under this series if for no other reason than that it continually promotes the past episodes and uh and so I'll just say any of you who want to go to the series you can go to Spotify or apple podcast and we've got the entire Series in sequence um there and there's also a YouTube playlist called LDS discussions under the Mormon stories podcast YouTube channel and you can literally listen to or watch these episodes in sequence starting from the very beginning and it'll be I've been told by tens of thousands of people it's one of the most important things they ever consumed um on the Mormon or ex Mormon internet Julie anything you want to say in addition to that uh no I just wanted to point out that this this is episode this should be episode 60 of the LDS discussions episode so yeah so you listen to one a day there's two months worth there for you to kind of enjoy one a week over it's over a [Music] year all right uh and I I think today is absolutely uh worthy of the LDS discussions brand we were supposed to have herard with us herard uh must have been busy who else do we normally have in our panel anyone else that's Nemo that was normally besides Mike in our panel was it me you Julie and Mike most of the time yeah most of the time okay well well three of the four that's not bad right yeah that's pretty good all right and Julia I think it was your idea to do this episode and um I'll say one last thing we're g to be showing a lot of images today and I want to encourage those of you who listen on Apple podcast but don't you know watch it on YouTube consider switching to Spotify to listen to these episodes if for no other reason than that Spotify allows you to do audio only but but it also now has video so literally you can be watching or listening on on the Spotify app and if there's an image you really want to see you can just pull it up open up Spotify switch to video and you can actually see on your mobile device um whatever images we're talking about in Spotify you can switch between video and audio the only other thing I'll say is that those of you who um you know uh those of you you also who want to be able to listen to and or watch these episodes you can listen to these episodes from YouTube as audio only if you just get the premium uh subscription to YouTube where you pay like 10 or 15 bucks a month and you can literally listen to to video episodes as if they're Audio Only and you miss all the commercials so if you want an adree version of Mormon stories all you got to do is just get a YouTube pre premium subscription and you'll be able to watch or listen to these episodes without any ads so that's a way to do an AdFree Mormon stories experience uh anything y'all want to add to that no that was good that was great okay I think that's important stuff so Julia you volunteered to produce this episode yeah but then I uh after reviewing it as I always do as an old man who's been at this stuff for 20 n why are you nodding what why do you immediately nod when I say old man what is up with that I'm just I'm just confirming to the people what they already know I'll arm wrestle you Nemo I'll arm wrestle you I'll Ben press you when you come to Utah next time subscribe to see it people subscribe to see it anyway as soon as Julia showed me this presentation she put together as an old man I said Julia let me add a couple slides so why don't you Julia start with the intro and then I'll give a little bit history as an old man before we proceed to the presentation you created yeah I just want to explain a little bit how I'm sort of setting this up so we're going to show the image you typically we're going to show the image that Anthony SWAT has painted and then a lot of times these have not been depicted in church history at all so then the next slide will be the same picture but with a historical explanation so this is sort of a history lesson showing his artwork and then we're going to compare Jeremy what Jeremy Reynold says in the CES letter to what Anthony sweat is either depicting or what he has said in some of his other presentations like he has he's online quite a bit and he's he's giving like Sunday lessons or things like that so so some of those are from from that so so his image historical background and then a comparison of the two so that's how I've basically set it up okay perfect and if it's okay because I don't think we plan to do this let me just go ahead and show Anthony sweat's BYU profile really quick so this is him uh at the BYU website it says he's a department chair so it looks like he's the department chair of church history and and Doctrine did you know that I don't think I knew that he was that connected to church history wow yeah so he's um he's got a website anthony.com and I'll just read his profile it says Anthony sweat received a BFA in painting and drawing from the University of Utah and is masters of education and PhD in curriculum and instruction from Utah State University so I'm going to just call it right there that's weird that uh you know a division one history department is cheered by a PhD who doesn't have a PhD in history but instead he's got one of those softer phds in this case from Utah state which I love but it's curriculum and instruction so he has like an education Master's in PhD doesn't even have a history degree maybe that's why that didn't stick out to because he like I'm getting my masters in history it's almost like the church historian not being a historian but being a lawyer right right anyway that's interesting if if he's the department chair of history and he doesn't even have a history bachelor's degree I'm just GNA call it that's super weird anyway um it says before joining the religion faculty at BYU okay wait it's saying religion faculty so now I'm confused church history oh church history in Doctrine yeah is that a different department than history yeah because probably CH church history isn't real history it's what the church says it is right okay sorry I I'm meant to be dispassionate and not snarky but like I I I think if you were looking at it objectively you would say that church history yeah being taught by a church University is not the same as just regular I bet Notre Dame's got a good history Department you know I don't think it has to be that way right no anyway before joining the religion faculty of BYU he worked for 13 years with Seminary and Institutes of religion so he was a CES guy Dr sweat is the author of several books and articles related to the teachings of the Church of Jesus Christ States his research centers on factors that influence effective religious education I'll say parenthetically indoctrination as a practicing artist his painting Center on previously un underrepresented important aspects of church history to promote visual learning this is that's really interesting and that's one of our points that we're going to talk about why is that to you Julia his paintings Center on previously unrepresented important aspects of church history and this is from the BYU website page so they're like oh yeah we haven't commissioned artists to do this I I love this the slight of hand in there where they talk about to promote visual learning as though they looked at the V model of learning and they were like ah we're just we as a church we've just let the visual Learners down you know we've always we've always been teaching this but we just we just haven't been catering to the visual Learners it's like no you haven't talked about this at all or very little this is not an issue of you've just not got the pictures no the church has actively hidden this information for 200 years and communicated people that talked about it like and I'd argue they still are to some degree and we'll talk about absolutely absolutely yeah anyway the last thing it says here is Anthony and his wife Cindy are the parents of seven children and they reside in Springville so I just thought Springville Utah I thought was uh would be interesting yeah that's good and and he teaches a course called foundations of the restoration or religion c225 I'm guessing that's the course that Bo students take if they want to get a little bit more of an accurate version of Mormon church history um but but also I'm sure the church is doing that to uh inoculate uh you know its BYU students uh to go out into the world anyway that's the introduction yeah okay uh anything else you want to say Julie before I give my little lesson I think that's good okay all right tell us about the good old days John all right so let's talk about the good old days so uh I I thought it was important to start with 2002 you know when I I lost my Mormon faith in 2001 and I started just going to read any book that I could because this was kind of pre- Internet before podcast before CES letter before stories I was just looking for stuff I could learn and believe it or not there are these things called books I know nowadays people don't really read them in in the Mormon internet Nemo have you ever read a Mormon book no no no you have books but you never actually read them yeah oh okay yeah yeah I do want to point out in 2002 I was five years old say Julie you read you read Mormon history books all the time but anyway one of the classics is a book called an Insider's view of Mormon Origins I would put it in the top five I haven't read this one history books ever written you have you have or have not I haven't read this one okay well Grant Palmer was a CES instructor uh CS director for several decades or teacher and uh when he was in his final years before he retired he came out with this book and he called it an insiders view because he was an Insider because he taught Seminary Institute for 30 years and this is probably one of the best books I've ever read that sort of gives a good explanation for how Joseph Smith uh came up with the Book of Mormon and how he Bamboozled people um you know regarding the priesthood and regarding his powers Etc so he gets a lot of credit for being kind of uh someone that really forced the Mormon church to have to start paying attention to uh you know the lies around Joseph Smith's translation and and that sort of thing and so I had him on Mormon stories very early on um and Juliet put together this slide in 2006 so this is in the within the first year and a couple months of the existence of Mormon stories uh I had gret Palmer on it was a four episode series where he talked about an Insider's view that's when I became taper Dan Dan Peterson's Arch me he was okay with me interviewing Richard Bushman but he got super mad at me for giving any visibility to Grant Palmer and Nemo you'll be interested to know that that's when I got on taper Dan's uh enemy list just for interviewing the guy and at the time I was an active member of the church teaching Elders Quorum but you know taper Dan again anytime you're just giving visibility to honest truthful history that made you an enemy in his mind I I don't think I'm on his enemies list I don't think he knows I exist oh I'm sure he does I'm sure he does keep it that way um after uh after I interviewed Grant Palmer um and he was disfellowshipped for writing an Insider view of Mormon Origins wow later he came out with some essays on sexual allegations against Joseph Smith during sort of his dur during the 1830s and even before that was during the time where he was getting excommunicated he eventually was excommunicated and I think it was during or after that 2012 period where I uh where I interviewed him about sexual allegations I've also interviewed a couple more times uh you know when he contracted cancer and we wanted to celebrate his life before he died I interviewed him a couple more times and he's definitely a super important person to know about and a lot of this uh episode I think U you know is attributable to him the other thing that was worth mentioning is in 2003 South Park did an episode on Mormonism like it had done on Scientology and uh it aired according to Julia on the 19th of November 2003 and in that um episode there's an accurate depiction of many things including how the the translation of the Book of Mormon probably actually happened and it was the first depiction I think anybody ever saw of sort of you know an artistic IC representation of what likely happened which was Joseph Smith sticking his head in a hat now Julie do we have a picture of that no I didn't gra a picture of that I wasn't sure how much but we should find one that's one of you guys go Google that really quick and we can show it but I won't stop the presentation okay but that that rocked my world and it rocked a lot of people's world because never you know we had always seen before the inaccurate but official version of of church history Nemo you're raising your hand yeah thank you sir uh I have a question about South Park given that when that aired in what what year was it 2003 2003 yeah again so I was six years old at the time so I wasn't allowed to watch South Park uh but my understanding is certainly the way I grew up in the church is that South Park would have been a show that Mormons shouldn't really have been watching anyway so I guess my question is how if it did at all how did that pervade the Mormon Zeitgeist how did that affect members how did that come to the attention of members it did at all that depiction of Joseph Smith well I mean um I would say that on the ex Mormon internet and the Mormon internet at the time and there were forums that people would join obviously liberal Mormons questioning Mormons and ex Mormons all immediately were talking about it of course Y and uh I'm just gonna go ahead and share I here it and what you can see are just Google Images you know there's Joseph Smith Smith was with his head you know head in the Hat um and uh there's him and Martin Harris uh you know with Martin Harris transcribing you know that that gives people a sense for like the types of images you know that there's uh there's Martin Harris giving the manuscript to his wife the the 116 pages that end up end up getting lost if you haven't seen that episode of South Park all about the morning it's definitely one of the most important things you could ever see um but but you got to give South Park credit and Nemo I hope I answered your question you kind of got to give South Park credit because they caught on to this stuff you know a year after Grant Palmer published his book but long before any of us ever really thought about uh this idea of artistically representing Mormon church history accurately any any comments y'all have no that's that was good okay so the next slide I have for you guys so so credit gra Hummer credit to South Park uh the next slide that I have is um a website that came out uh I don't know exactly it came out in the 2000s let's just say 2007 2008 uh I think y'all uh actually I'm gonna pull up the uh I I pulled it up actually from the um the way machine on archive.org because uh because you this website has been taken down but the website uh that it used to be called was it was called images of the restoration and I actually had a friend who is an attorney who drew these images of accurate depictions of Mormon church history as a uh non-b believer and um but but he was in hiding because he was a successful attorney and he didn't want his attorney uh legal practice to be affected by him being outed as somebody who is doing factual church history art so on the left you have the picture of the website as it um as it was originally released it was called images of the restoration that website's being taken down but the images of been reproduced in a website called intellectual preses serve.org that's where you can find them now um so I've got an image of the original website images of the restoration on the on the left images of the restoration under intellectual preserve on the right and let me just go ah and show y'all some of the images that my friend who I won't name um you know uh produced and y'all tell me if you can figure out what these images are of so Nemo I'll let you go first what do you guess this is an image of is that Joseph Smith Senor having the dream that then became the high's Vision yep so what do you drew is he drew Joseph Smith Senior telling Joseph Smith Jr and do you do you think that's ham who else do you think that would be Alvin maybe Alvin maybe and he's this is basically a picture of Joseph Smith Senor telling his dream of a tree with the tree of life and the fruit and the great and spacious building and the you know Mist Of Darkness and basically the point here is is you know before Joseph Smith ever wrote Into the Book of Mormon lehi's dream he knew about his dad's dream and most people think that b basically just Joseph imported leh uh Joseph mcor's Dream Into the Book of Mormon so that's what this is depicting does that make sense yeah so that's one example here's another example of uh of my friend's artwork uh and again I can't name him any of y'all want to guess what this is an image of which one the uh C can you see it this is all Joseph Smith's um interactions with the Divine over the years and how these things changed and Julia you were you were uh I did I had never really uh read this closely have to pay attention to it but what's interesting about the first three images we all know about you know the five or the six different versions of the first Vision that Joseph Smith taught and so that's what you'll see in the middle is an 18 1932 version where the Lord appears to Joseph Smith like in a vision right um and then there's a few other versions it ends in the 184 1838 version which is the official version where God and Jesus appeared to Joseph Smith and then there's of course the other versions in the Middle where where you get you know Satan binding Joseph you get hosts of Heaven you know all the different details of the of the four or five other versions uh that we have but Julia tell us what the first three versions are well so for those just listening this is a panel there's there's a three three rows of three images and so it's just going through the timeline but yeah the first one looks like he's trying to retrieve the plates and the angel is knocking him down and he and we hear this story throughout church history where he he was knocked down and he gets back up and he's knocked down again and so that's just that I've never seen it that depicted before and I think that's important to mention because Joseph never told anybody about his first Vision until when um well it became known in the church in the 40s the first written account was was 32 yeah but he was that was not the church members did not know that story so the 1827 version would be his first telling that we know of of any sort of interaction with the divine right yeah and those were published in the newspapers and things like that so these stories or in other anti that's the visitation of Moroni right that that would I don't know I don't know was named yet Nephi depending yeah like it was an angel right Julie it was an angel and then it was Nephi and then it was Moroni likeon gone through a whole Shield of like a toad or a or a Quaker or like he's gone through a whole metamorphosis of characters but yeah the second one I'm not quite sure I'm not know if I I don't know if I can see the image very well differ between 1827 and 1834 to 5 so the top middle and the middle middle um those are like the same image of the visitation of the Angel Etc except for one has uh treasure digging equipment in the background by the looks of it and that's true stone and a hat on a chair and then the other one is different again well one of the first newspaper accounts said that Joseph Smith was visited in a Dream by the almighty and then that's where the Almighty which I'm assuming is God showed him where the plates were buried so that could be the 1827 image that we're looking at because it's very treasure digging um stuff the 1831 I'm not quite sure it's just one person I don't know if that's supposed to be God or an Angel um but again all the stories before that were just Angels or just or different characters like that but none of them were were God and Jesus that we that we think of now yeah okay so that was a that's another um image of the restoration y'all want to guess what this is gift of the rod Ian I mean the Sprout the Sprout I mean tell tell our viewers and listeners what what what this is depicting yeah all with diving RS right what did he used to do just for those who are brand new well so divining rods were generally used to find water um I think farmers use them generally um but but Joseph and Oliver were very steeped in the Treasure digging views and so um I don't know so in reference so treasure digging I'm assuming that's what the the rods were used for in fact there's stories of um Bean um Alvin bean I think was looking for the plates and he used divining rods and he found the place where they had been buried but Joseph had moved them but um but I don't understand this in in the scriptures Joseph is saying that Oliver should use the rods to translate the plates and I've never heard of any story of these being able to translate anything it's usually a Lo it's a location finder so I don't know how that was going to play out but I'm pretty sure we did an episode on LDS discussions about changes to the Doctrine and Covenants over time and we'll talk about that yeah has Anthony SWAT has an image like this too because because originally the doctrine of covenants or book of Comm refers to um The Gift of the rod to Oliver Cal's gift of the rod and then it was changed to sprout and then was changed to gift of Aaron yeah yeah for sure so that's why it's important this is stuff that made it into the doctrine covenants so that's why it's it's not just water it's not just water searching it's it's you know scpal yeah yeah okay so that's that's what this is depicting how about this one y'all want to guess what this is Jose for for our listeners what do you see so there's do you want to describe anymore or want me yeah sure um there's some individuals in a room with a window uh one of them has a pipe in fact two of them are uh smoking pipes uh one of them is drinking while on the floor they have weapons they have pistols pepper box pistols um for a little bit of added historical accuracy and this is Joseph's last night in Carthage Jail uh which I believe it was John Taylor says that they sent for alcohol some have said that it was sent for you know medicinal purposes whatever no it was to lift our spirit like he's very clear that they were drinking to try and pick up their spirits and and make them feel better singing oh go ahead isn't he singing is that why he's got his arm EXT he singing a Poway fairy man oref because I think that was like the him that Joseph loved and Joseph's just throwing throwing one back you know what I mean right throwing wine back so that you know that that's one of the images of the restoration here's a little scandalous one what do we see here oh this one's multi-layered because you got Jose if sort of approaching a woman on the bed and trying to kind of get her involved in an Amorous Affair but the picture in the background has an angel with a flaming sword and wings um guarding the way of the Garden of Eden I think that's him banishing Adam and Eve from the Garden of Eden in that picture in the background um but yeah this is the dirty nasty Affair as it was described between is it is it fanager or is it could be fanager it could be anyone else I'm guessing it's not fanager and there I know he also did an image of Fanny aler Joseph and Fanny in the barn like on a hay bale like Joseph on top of Fanny for some reason I couldn't find it in the website so this woman looks older than Fanny would have been yeah any number of them right this is the same 30 there's 30 to choose from and then this one this one y'all want to describe that Nemo this is uh Joseph sat on a stairwell with his head in a hat Alice South Park and and any other you know descriptions of That with uh the Scribe potentially cry or or whoever down below him on a table facing away from him writing down what Joseph dictates from uh whatever he's seeing in the Hat and there's obviously no plates in the room no plates in the room it's even but even the depiction of Joseph is kind of separated from that's is this Martin Harris he's kind of separated from him so like that's just really interesting to me I hadn't really I don't know which account that this artist is pulling from where they're not even normally even with the hat head and the hat they're at the same table but here they're basically not even in the same room I think this is potentially just to create this sort of artistic division it's it's a very powerful way sort of like in this image it creates a powerful separation between the subject of the image and the secondary subject the I just wonder if that's I wonder if that's based on a historical account where they're separated like that that's just so interesting well the the main reason I want to give that history is because like the church loves things to go down the memory hole and the church loves to you know punish people who are truth tellers and then wait five or 10 years and then do some act as a way to neutralize or inoculate its members that's totally response to to a truth teller that they punished or excommunicated and then make it seem like it's totally authentic new and original when in reality it's totally not just a response but a response to a truth teller who is excommunicated and you know whether it's Grant Palmer who's excommunicated or F Brody or you know Sandra Tanner or me or whatever or or you know whether it's this art the South Park or my friend's art you know Anthony SWAT doesn't get any credit at all and the church doesn't get any credit at all for this this um Innovative artwork that they're doing I just think it's important to know there's a history behind this and it's the Mormon internet and Grant Palmer and courageous historians like f Brody and the Tanners that forced the church to create these depictions right and another person who is important in helping Force the church to make these depictions is the CES letter because well Julia this is where you can kind of take over yeah well I think this is a it's a good timeline because that we've been we've been documenting like 20 2002 with Grant Palmer and then throughout and then um the South Park episode and then uh this one um he published C Jeremy Reynolds published the CES letter in April of 2013 and then if you go to the next slide from what I have found um Anthony sweat started started his artwork in 2014 which is right after right after Joseph or I mean right after Jeremy published his book so to me that feels like really close um and then he his artwork was as far as I'm concerned or as far as I'm aware if anyone has information uh that's different than this please let me know but I think his artwork was first printed in the book for from Darkness unto light and I remember I consumed that book as an active member of the church because I wanted to learn more about the translation process because that was so interesting to me but so anyway so yeah 2014 is when when I as far as I can tell Anthony sweat started doing started publishing his artwork I have a question about the phrasing on this slide uh it says that he was mission to paint an accurate depiction of the book of Mor translation process he he'll talk about that too yeah okay yeah so we we'll bring that up later I'm glad you pointed that out yeah he he talks about that in one of the slides okay next slide um all right okay so I just wanted to like just show you guys um these are the images of these are various images of how the members of the church have been shown the translation process it's very like Joseph's got the plates are open he's right next to Oliver or um and he's got his finger on the plates and he's just kind of in study and then one of them it's depicted with a sheet between the two of them and Joseph's got his the little glasses on the breastplate um but this is generally what we what we think of when we think of the translation process this is what this is what the members have been consuming this is what has been published in all the church literature in fact if you try to go back and find them you won't find anything any accurate depictions of the translation process so the church is very specifically very carefully showing you this image even though it's not correct and then if you jump to the next one well I just want to say like it's outrageous that the church has shown these images over the past decades or more because the church has known about the stone and the hat for probably for its entire existence it's had the searstone in its Vault for forever for as long as it's had a vault I'm sure and so it it we have to just note it's been an act of intentional overt deception for at least a half to a full Century of the church in including these images on you know walls of Chapel in its official curriculum like you know we're talking about an act of intentional overt deception for for decades if not centuries yeah can I can I make a quick point on that um people like to blame the artists for this right and they say oh it's the artist's fault you know that's how the artist chose to depict it but ultimately the artist that painted these would have been working to a brief or even if they weren't working to a brief and they were just painting from their understanding when they submitted it to the church and the church used it officially the church then made a choice to publish this knowing that this is what would then be represented to the members and non-members of the church so no matter how it got painted just discarding the fact that the church probably commissioned it to be painted to look this way in some cases ultimately by the church choosing to publish it and put it out there it's the church's responsibility for propagating the message that these images put forward right I just think that needs to be really really clear yes yeah perfect thank you Nemo okay Julia so so this is this is what it would have looked like this is what the translation process does look like although I I think you we can argue to some degree because a lot of these are showing the plates um in existence somewhere on the table and there are there are um stories historical accounts of that happening although I think a lot of times the plates weren't even in the room yeah um but here you have Joseph and he's either with um Oliver cowry or Martin Harris or Emma and he's got his stone and a hat and he's like looking into them only one of them is showing him with his face actually in the Hat which is what the historical accounts say is that he buried his face in the Hat and the only one that did that has done that is the bottom one which was done by John's friend um so that's so even that's interesting to point out like even these ones commissioned by the church he doesn't have his face actually buried yet and I think that's all really summed up do you have the video that goes with the bottom right image there of Russ Nelson I don't think I pull that because if people were to go watch that video you will see that that is as close as that hat gets to his face it might get slightly closer he goes to do it and then you can see he realizes it's a bad idea and he shouldn't do it because he knows how it looks and and that is emblematic of all these other pictures that the church has commissioned here which is that they know just how it looks from do putting his head in the Hat so they won't show it right Russ Russ Nelson prophet of God cannot bring himself to do that because even he knows that's a bit far yeah yeah nice it's great video you should go watch it yeah it is a great video um okay so this is kind of how I was explaining how I've set this up and so you have Jeremy RNs on one side with the red and this is so these are questions and concerns or direct quotes from the CES letter and then we're comparing them to the side on the blue with an Anthony sweat and what he's what he is saying in his images or what he is saying in in other outside interviews that he's done so it's just a comparison of the two yeah and again I know I'm kind of we're probably beating a dead horse here but the main point of this episode is to show that a BYU professor religion faculty is creating art that validates uh the main concerns expressed in the CES letter that Mormon apologists want to deride as being anti-mormon and inaccurate and uh you know biased right exactly yeah I think that's just I I think we can't emphasize that and that is the story of the CES letter is Jeremy Reynolds makes points and apologists have to concede them but then say Oh but it doesn't mean what you think it means yeah and that that's that seems to be the argument around the Cs letter now as kind of like a broad topic point is that um yeah no one's really arguing over the details anymore because the church has been forced to admit a lot of this stuff and now they're arguing about oh but we can still find a way to make it okay that Joseph did x y and Zed we can still find a way to make it okay that this was actually how he translated all along right yeah yeah yeah okay so let's go ahead and go to the first is this the first Anthony sweat image yeah so this one is called the first Visions by Anthony sweat it's the early the Early state that I found for this painting is actually 2019 and again if somebody has different information I just let me know because these are just things I this is just what I was able to gather and so the image here actually if you go to the next slide I think it Point has little arrows that point out okay yeah aspects of the painting so yeah you'll you'll see this Joseph Smith he's in the forest and there's like fire assuming half the image and then there's two figures in the fire and then there's there's a multitude of Angels or faces behind them and so like he's and what Anthony sweat is doing is he's taking pretty much all either four or nine accounts and he's like kind of molding them into one image and so you have in the bottom corner you have the axe on the on the wood you have the angels in the top you have God and Christ are not quite next to each other because in some accounts they appear separately they appear at different times and then in one corner you have it looks like it looks like a figure with a black black and red cape almost this is I think a depiction of the devil and then it's daylight outside and so like so like there's different things is he's just showing like this is a bunch of different um accounts mixed into one and then the fire of course because there's some where he says he thought the leaves would catch fire and then the other ones they call it a pillar of light um and so it's just a very different image than what we're used to seeing yeah 1838 account which is the one that's in the P great price very specifically says a pillar of light descended right yeah brighter than Noonday Sun all that sort of thing um that's where we get oh how lovely was the morning that himm all draws from that account uh but the axe that's a particular detail that I think I wasn't expecting to see yeah um he there's a there's an account where he says he went around and he was looking for a perfect spot in the Grove and he left his axe there to Signal hey go here and pray and so that was an interesting addition that Anthony sweat added and I guess is it should we give credit credit where credit is due and say even though we're we wanted to make sure and acknowledge that the church number one has deceived people and number two was forced to do this sort of thing I mean I guess it's good that at some point they're starting to try and be more honest so can we can we at least say good job Church good job Anthony sweat for trying to advance history more Nemo I would say yes and no because what this image does is yeah okay it it acknowledges or tries to draw in all the different ones but because it's a singular image it still gives the impression that this is the scene as it appeared and so what this is is this is an attempt to take all those accounts and make them all work together and it fails to acknowledge the underlying contradictions between those accounts I.E how many people were there because in some of them those Angelic hosts weren't there and some so so what this is saying is oh well there's one yeah there's one that says there was Angelic host there therefore Joseph just neglected to mention it in all the others and they were just clearly there all along similarly oh well we only have one account that says it was only one person so it probably was always the two so we're going to ignore that different so so yes and no there is credit to them trying but like with many things the church tries to do they'll react but they'll still try and control to an extent and so they're still trying to control and say look here here's one image that makes it all work together it all the elements that are different and makes all work together but that doesn't Square the contradictions right all right so no no not a lot of brownie points from Nemo what about you Julie any brownie points no I I would say the same thing because he's trying to that's what a lot of apologists do is they're saying oh you know it you know it' be it would be suspicious if all the accounts were similar or they all you know you know went along with each other but they actually actively contradict each other and they contradict the historical the historical record through out and so like they're just he's just trying to make it work he's like it's okay if they're different it's okay if they're contradictory they still fit into this image and so I don't I don't know if I'd give a lot of credit like it's a beautiful image it's a great it's a great painting I just don't think it it I wouldn't give it brny points okay all right all right so that's the first one but I mean I guess brownie points to Anthony's sweat for trying to paint the things that haven't been previously painted like I will yeah I give you that I can I can give him that that's what I mean oh that's that's episode really is is good on you rounding points for for depicting these things that haven't been depicted um they should have been depicted a long time ago but and with this particular one I take exception with the ways depicted it because it seems a bit deceptive to try and imply that they can all work together in one image yeah and again I'm gonna remind you all listening on Spotify that you can actually switch and see these images in Spotify this is an image heavy episode You're Gonna Want to yeah do that yeah so I just want I just wanted to throw this one in there too because this is another depiction that Anthony sweat has done it is called a column of light and it is vastly different than the one he than the one we just saw he he's in the Joseph's in the it looks like he's maybe in the forest it's kind of Darker around him but then there's light that's like raining down on him um it's a really beautiful picture it's just very different than what his last image was okay but that's still pretty compatible with the traditional 1838 account right8 yeah for sure traditional pose the lean back the Brandon Flowers pose from his music video oh I need to watch that which he knew what he was doing yeah okay what's this next slide okay so this is comparing the Cs letter with what Anthony SWAT is doing um Neo do you want to pick one and I can read the other one sure I'll take Jeremy reynals okay I did not know there are multiple First Vision accounts I did not know of their contradictions or that the church members did not know about the first Vision until 12 to 22 years after it supposedly happened I was unaware of these emissions in the mission field I was never taught or trained in the Missionary Training Center to teach investigators these facts yeah then sorry just real quick that is the state of the church at the time that Jeremy was writing this and the problem that CSS is facing now is like the Stick of Joseph Lads when they come on John's episode and they're like yeah well we know about this stuff like and and again this is a broad theme this episode they only know about it because people like Jeremy have forced people like Anthony to paint things and talk about it the church has been forced into talking about it and Jeremy was excommunicated for producing the CES but but Jeremy's coming from a perspective that resonates with people of that time which was yeah we weren't told about these things we didn't know about these things they weren't overtly there as part of the church's history if they're becoming more common now great but what people like the Stick of Joseph Lads needs to need to acknowledge is that they exist in a different time they grew up through the church in a different time and of these things and as a resident old guy is the resident old guy as Nemo likes to call me on this episode I'm 55 in all my years in the church sixth generation Mormon no one ever in church ever talk to me about the multiple versions of the first vision and I didn't learn about this until my late 20s early 30s reading these books like you know F Brody and and Grant Palmer that's how I learned about it for the first time y yeah did you want to talk about the right side Julia yeah yeah so this so this is kind of reiterating what I've already said so in one painting Anthony sweat is combining the first Vision accounts to make them into one harmonious scene he acknowledges and depicts the differences Satan being cast out many angels that Jesus appeared at a different time than God the Father Etc and then in another painting Anthony sweat to pick something totally different yeah yeah got it so he's at least adding in the extra I I think what I would say there rather than saying he he kind of acknowledges and depicts the differences I I would say it's more that he brings in the extra details from the other accounts and tries to add them to the 38 account to harmonize them as we that's true yeah all right uh we've got a little video here do you want to tell us what this is gonna be Julia um yeah so they're talking about the this idea that the first Vision these different accounts have been hidden from the church and so who are who are these people so it's it's Elder Oaks talking with Elder Ballard and they're doing I think it's a face to face um with these teenagers um and so they're talking about this this idea that oh that we've been hiding the first Vision so and while Elder Elder Ballard passed away recently but but at the time Oaks and Ballard were two of the top what three or four ranking Mormons in the world basically yes and Oaks is now the next in line to be the Propet yeah all right let's play the clip some are uh saying that the church has been hiding the fact that there was more than one version of the of the first Vision which is uh just uh not true the facts are we don't study we don't go back and search what has been said on the subject for example Dr James B Allen of the BYU in 1970 he he he produced a an article for the church magazines explaining all about the different versions of the first Vision how long ago was that article 1970 that was back in 1970 so been hiding that for a long time yeah but but it it's just is this this this idea that the church is hiding something that which we would have to say as two apostles who have covered the world and know the history of the church and know the Integrity of the first presidency in the Corum of the 12 from the beginning of time there has been no attempt on the part in any way of the church leaders trying to hide anything from anybody now we've had the Joseph Smith papers we didn't have those where they were in our hands now and they're and so we're learning more about the Prophet Joseph as wonderful we are there's volumes of it there's so much of in those books now in my bookshelf maybe you've read them all but I haven't got I'm a slow reader much so just trust us wherever you are in the world and you share this message with anyone else who raises the question about the church not being transparent we're as transparent as we know how to be and telling the truth we have to do that that's the Lord's way now Nemo and Julia you're both snickering throughout this entire episode why are yall snickering like just Devil's Advocate you can find an inside article here or there over the past 30 or 40 years where they mention the stone in the Hat for example so why is that not valid that they've never hidden anything and that they've been talking about this openly Forever This is the church library app right you go to the enzy the earliest enzy you can access through the church's own website or library is 1971 so you've got to go to a separate website you got to go to archive.org to find the the 1970 IGN article that he's talking about because for some reason the church doesn't have on its website readily accessible all of its old magazines so there's a point if they're trying to be fully transparent then why is that magazine not available on the church's website now uh I have personal experience with d h OES and his lack of transparency and his dishonesty so I I mean that video always you know strikes me but when he says oh we've been hiding that for a long time it's like well yeah but it's not on your website it's not readily accessible to people so yes there has been articles and I think this is where you have to take a broader View and recognize that just because someone talked about something one time doesn't mean that it was part of the dominant narrative doesn't mean that it was what was taught in the classrooms every day uh you know it it's it's not that it was part of the narrative that people grew up with it's that one person as a curio went oh did you know there was like more than one account and it was like oh okay cool and that's it well and then additionally like you have you've told the story many times in Mormon stories where Joseph I think it's Joseph F Smith where he takes he rips the 1832 account Fielding Fielding Fielding Fielding okay Joseph Fielding where he rips the 1832 account out of the out of the letterbook and he puts it in his vault and then it wasn't until the Tanners said that they're like hey can we see this that they that he put it back in and it's been taped in and you can see the images you can see that it's been torn and taped and like so we're as honest as we know how to be well it looks like you don't know how to be very honest if you're gonna take some pages out and hide them and so like yeah I just have a hard time with that can I read that quote you sent in the in the private chat is that okay the Galaxy yeah this is one of my favorite quotes from Hitchhiker's Guide it's one of my favorite books and this this always comes to my mind when thinking about the first Vision all right yeah I I'll read that so but the plans were on display on display I eventually had to go down to the the cell to find them that's the display Department with a flashlight ah well the lights had probably gone so with the stairs but look you found the notice didn't you yes said Arthur yes I did it was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck to a stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying Beware of the leopard that just I just laugh CU like it's just hard the church it makes it hard to find things like even the gospel topic essays I think are a little bit harder to find like I just it's just well that IGN article is plausible deniability you publish one article and you say look see we've talked about it but there's a difference between there being like I said one article there's a difference between something being on prominent display and something being through all those layers which you have to get through right exactly and it's it's the same with this there's a difference between someone talking about it one time in a church magazine like it's some sort of curio and it actually becoming part of the narrative that people are taught about the history of the church right yeah they know how to be honest and the way to be honest would be to fix the art to show accurate visual representations of the translation of the first Vision to in the CES you know Seminary and Institute curriculum and in the Sunday School curriculum to teach about the multiple versions of the first Vision to teach about the real translation process to teach about the Masonic influences in the temple ceremony to teach about polygamy and polyandry because they've known about that stuff for a couple centuries so yeah it's an outrageous double Li in deception for them to both lie and hide things excommunicate people that talk about them and then to claim they've always been open and honest and transparent it's kind of gross and I think that's why y'all were snickering because it's just oh yeah outrageously ridiculous why did they ask communicate J Jeremy Reynolds why did they excommunicate me why do they excommunicate Simon suton for discovering the DNA problems in the Book of Mormon why did they excommunicate um you know uh Bill reel it's it's because they want to label as apostates the truth tellers so that no one will pay attention to anything that they have to say that's truthful about the church's history is truth Clips yeah all right what's this next image Julia okay so this one is I don't know I don't know if I ever knew how to say it gazum g how do you say this maybe Gaz Gaz but this is a painting by Anthony s so gazam a stone and so Joseph is helping dig Willer chases well and and while he's digging he's find he finds this like tiger's eye it's like this brown and and black stone and he's here he's reaching for it to pick it up and so that's something I've never seen depicted in the in the church in any of the church's artwork and how does this how does this connect draw connected dots how does this connect to controversial church history um so if you skip to the next one I think I I think I give a little historical background so should we read this account this is from so this is from in 1833 Willard Chase gave his affidavit that was then published in Edie how's book Mormonism unveiled this is a quote from the book in the year of 1822 I was engaged in digging a well I employed Alvin and Joseph Smith to assist me the latter of whom is now known as the Mormon prophet after digging about 20 feet below the surface of the Earth we discovered a singular singularly appearing Stone which excited my curiosity it's a very pretty Stone by the way I brought it to the top of the well and as we were examining it Joseph put it into his hat and then his face into the top of his hat it has been said by it has been said by Smith that he brought the Stone from the well but this is false there was no one in the well but myself I the next morning he came to me and wished to obtain the stone alleging that he could he could see it in it but I told him I did not wish to part with it on account of it being being a curiosity but he but would lend it after obtaining the stone he began to publish abroad that what that what wonders he would discover by looking into it and made so much disturbance among the um credulous part of the community that I ordered the stone to be returned to me again and so this is this is Willer Chase's version of it he said you know Joseph didn't find the stone it was mine Joseph used you know could see things in the stone and he wanted to borrow it he never gave it back um but yeah this is sort of controversial because um we've never the church doesn't depict this the church tries to leave the treasure digging out of it TR tries to leave all this magic worldview things out and so the stone is a very seems like a very recent thing as far as the church like I I remember I was an active member of the church whenever they published I think in the enzy the pictures of these stones or the images of images of the stone if that makes sense and I was shocked I was like I first of all like I known about the stone but I didn't know the church had it because I feel like that's a totally different thing because that if the if the church is run by Prophet Sears and revelators and they have a sear stone that you know they use to translate The Book of Mormon why why are they not using it why do they have it what is it used for I don't know just it was it really shook me and then I I'm not surprised that they HIIT it because the best they could come up with when they were talking about it was dto fuor saying well it's kind of like my iPhone you know I can look at my iPhone and see things and the stones like that so they realized again I think just like with putting the head in the Hat they realized that this thing looks difficult it you know to the credulous members of the church who who have been taught that you can't play with face cards because they're too much like tarot cards because it's too much like wh craft and magic and things the occult that we meant to stay away from all of a sudden you've got this object of the occult a sear stone that Joseph Smith meant to have had and the church has like you said kept hold of for all these years so they clearly value it as an artifact they clearly value its position otherwise they would just got rid of it they would let Community of Christ have it or or whatever you know but they've clearly held on to it for a reason yeah and one the one thing I want to add that I think gets forgotten in in a lot of this conversation is that originally it wasn't Joseph that necessarily had the secret special powers it was the stone Joseph didn't start out by telling everybody he had the powers of being a sear per se and so the whole reason why Chase has been out of shape Willard Chase has been out of shape you know and he's you know the story he's telling the affidavit is he thinks that stone is magical and he wants it it back because he thinks that it's a magical stone and you have to ask yourself if you're a believing Mormon do you believe that stones are magical because that's certainly what Joseph believed at the time and that's certainly what Willard Chase believed at the time and that's why Willard Chase wanted the stone back and and that's why the church would have kept it for so long otherwise why is it even valuable or useful but then if you're right okay yeah Stones can be magical then you have to ask yourself well then why doesn't Russell M Nelson or Don H jokes whip out that stone and give us more Revelations because they have it and they certainly could use it if it was magical and that's all part of the reasons why the church is hid the church hid this Stone and hid the translation process for so long because it was connected to those days where Joseph Smith was a treasure Digger breaking the law you know employing fakely fraudulently employing folk magic to fool people because obviously Stones don't have power and if the stone doesn't have any power then then what was going on it had to have been Joseph was lying to people saying that he could see treasure in the earth when he clearly couldn't so and and that speaks to the broader question doesn't it of why you know Revelation seem to drop off a cliff within the church at the death of Joseph Smith right why Doctrine and Covenants all of a sudden gets very very quiet quiet once Joseph Smith dies there's a few sections added afterwards and there's a couple of official declarations but just we went from new sections of the do Covance to okay we'll just call these official declarations and now we've got like oh well we got the family proclamation which we still haven't put in the standard works and Dan jokes is desperately trying to get it canonized as scripture but he won't like the train has slowed massively and the the revelation of this Stone again to John would would ask the question why aren't they using it because if it worked for Joseph why why do we not need it now yeah couldn't wouldn't it be great to have Revelation on LGBT issues on women or or even something just as simple as so the there's so many languages there's thousands of languages um that people speak the Book of Mormon has only been been published in like 200 of them so like even if you just publish The Book of Mormon in different languages like just have it do the same thing that it did for Joseph but dead languages that we don't even know anymore not even just Revelation but just you know putting making the book of mar more accessible like they can't even do that or Co let letting us know ahead of time that Co was coming letting you Quintel cook saying on the church's podcast the church News podcast that we didn't know there was going to be a pandemic he admitted that on the church searstone would have told him if they had been using it right yeah okay so to then to then sort of show Anthony sweat validating the CES letter we have the next slide again cool I'll take Jeremy me that the gold plates that ancient prophets went through all that time and effort of making engraving compiling abridging preserving hiding and transporting only for Joseph to translate instead using just a rock in a hat a rock he found digging his neighbor's property in 1822 and which he later used for treasure hunting yeah that's a that's a big thing for me too because like the you know in the book of they talk about how hard it was to preserve these plates how big they were how heavy they must have been and yeah Joseph doesn't even oh and how long they were waiting and the angel came and said this is very important don't tell anybody bring only a certain person to help you retrieve them and then Joseph doesn't use the plates he just uses the rock in a hat so that's wild but so on the on the flip side with Anthony s we've kind of already talked about this but he painted Joseph Smith finding his brown sear Stone while digging a well for Willer Chase as an artist he is also very aware of how under depicted Joseph Smith sear Stone has been especially in the translation process and he talks about that too just it's just not in the church's artwork at all I really do think the Mormon Church owes its membership in the world and apology for deceiving people about the translation process for so so long and uh but and they're also still doing it you know what I mean so it is an active because you'll see that painting in in church chapels today you'll still find the false translation you know images in church curriculum so it's it's an act of active deception not only have they been deceptive in the past they're still being deceptive very much so yeah yeah okay what's the next painting we have Okay so this one is called the harmony treasure SE Searcher by Anthony sweat and I've never seen this depicted in church history I think it's fascinating wow you've got Joseph Smith you've got a lot of characters in the woods um one two three four five characters and then you have Joseph separate and everyone else is holding a shovel but jph is not he's just holding his brown searstone and he's just kind of talking to one of the men and so I just think this is so interesting because Joseph was not actually the church in some of the in some of the depictions you'll see him like holding a shovel as he's walking by and Emma's looking at him like Joseph wasn't actually Joseph did not actually dig Joseph was not a digger all he did was he put the stone in a hat and he would tell people where to dig and so I thought that was really interesting that Anthony sweat is very specifically painting this this person of Joseph and this is this is significant because uh it was illegal to be a treasure Digger it was literally illegal oh you have another you have another slide yeah I like the history yeah uh John do you want to read this one okay sure so this uh this slide says the harmony treasure Searcher on November 1st 1825 quote articles of agreement close quote were signed by nine men Isaac hail that's Emma's dad David hail P Newton Charles a Newton Joseph Smith Senor Isaiah stole Calvin stole Joseph Smith Jr and William I Wy the agreement was that quote if anything of value should be obtained at a certain place in Pennsylvania near a William hailes supposed to be valuable uh mine of either gold or silver to have it divided Joseph Smith Senior and Jill Smith Jr shall be considered as having two shares two 11s of the property that may be obtained the shares be taken equally from each third why is that significant Julie I just was explain this is just an explanation of the painting so they're so they're saying we don't know like they're very certain that that they're going to find something using the sear Stone the stone and a hat and so much so that they write up an agreement this articles of agreement in 1825 and they break it down they break down you get this amount you get this amount and Joseph and his dad are GNA share this amount and they're just so sure that they're going to find something and I just think that's so interesting historically like that they're they're very steeped into this treasure digging um lore or concept now to be fair does that mean they really believed that that Joseph and Joseph Joseph Junior and senior both believed they were had powers and were going to find something or could that have just been a way to formalize a fraud and to make everyone feel like you were sincere when you really knew you were defrauding people wait are you asking if I think Joseph and Senior and Junior believed it like some would say that that the existence of that agreement would at least show that Joseph Smith Jr and Senior were optimistic that they would find something else why would they bother writing up an agreement I think believed he had powers even if he didn't really have them that's one Theory but then you have stories of like Joseph where um this man is saying the conversation between Joseph and Isaac where Joseph says I've never seen anything in the stone so but then you have other chance other times where you think that Joseph really maybe does believe it like later he goes to um he goes to someplace and it's in the doctorine covenants is it salmon where does he go he goes somewhere to go to find Bar Treasure as a prophet of the church and so like I don't know you could see it either way like maybe he does believe maybe he's not quite sure doesn't he go to Salem to try Salem Massachusetts to find some treasure in a basement somewhere kind of thing yes yeah I forgot about that one I forgot the name yeah Salem what what do you think Nemo do you think that you know this suggest Joseph was was a sincere believer in his powers maybe I think he was he was a believer in the possibility of it but then equally he was getting paid and would get paid if the treas treasure was found or not with certain Arrangements right so there is a there is something to be said there for someone that knows that they're not going to find anything but he still going to get some money out of it anyway so it's very hard to tell I think I I don't think we can know for certain one way or another um I think more broadly he is inro in the magical world viiew we understand that and he he does believe in these things some more broadly um but whether he believes he will actually see things and find things I don't know it's really hard to tell to answer my own question I don't think it means anything because obviously if someone if someone's going to pay all this money jiah sto is going to pay all this money to do a a silver mine excavation he's going to want a legal agreement ahead of time as to who gets what because he's footing the bill um and then if Joseph and Joseph Jor and Senor don't ask for some of it it's gonna look sketchy that they're just like giving it all all the wealth to somebody else so I don't think it means anything but uh I just thought I'd asked the question anyway and and there is always the possibility that they would find something whether with magical powers or not there's always the possib they do stumble across something that's true but the main point is is that this is kind of important because it's a BYU professor religion Professor acknowledging what the church fought to deny including with h nibbi and others BH Robert shibi Joseph Fielding Smith you'll you'll read books published by the church for decades saying Joseph was not a treasure Digger those are lies you know for a long long time in fact I think even H nibl said if the treasure digging story was true it would be one of the most damning things that could ever be uncovered about Joseph Smith am wrong even as recently as around 2010 you have Jeffrey R Holland denying it to John Sweeney in a BBC interview and then going there's a a great deal of of difficulty in the Life of the American frontier um or or and then says essentially but it has no bearing on the character of the man being like it doesn't matter whether he was convicted for trag diing or not um so yeah they're still trying to deny it as recently as the 2010s yeah um but to tie it back to the CES letter yeah so I'll read this one Joseph was hired by folks like Jeremy writing oh yeah sorry this is directly from the Cs letter Joseph was hired by folks like Josiah stole who Joseph mentions in his history in 1826 Joseph was arrested and brought to court in Banbridge New York on the complaint of sto's nephew who who accused Joseph of being a disorderly person and an impostor because believe what you want about the power of the stone and Joseph he was engaging in illegal activity according to the laws of New York and Pennsylvania and he ends up in several trials or Courts for his crimes full stop right yeah and this is the 1826 uh arrest and court that that John Sweeney brought to Jeffrey o Holland and said no 1826 this happened and uh Holland tried to say he didn't know anything about it and then tried to get out of it wow did you want to say Julie anything about the right side um I've already said it but Anthony sweat's depiction of Joseph is of is of Joseph standing holding only his sear Stone he is deliberately showing Joseph not as a treasure Digger but as a treasure Seer I just also think that's very interesting so he's always picking Anthony sweat's always picking the most favorable way to depict a problem IC story it's like going yeah he didn't hand the shovel himself though did he he was just telling people where to dig you know what I'm saying and he's not he doesn't have his head in a hat while they're digging treasure right yeah he yeah you're right he doesn't show that and also these were these excursions always happen in the middle of the night they would do some kind of Enchantment and the night time was the best time to do it so sometimes they'd like kill a chicken or a dog like like yeah they put staks in the ground yeah there's a lot um uh Michael Quinn his book uh early Mormonism in the magic worldview he goes into a lot of details on that it's it's amazing the things that you'll learn like even Joseph getting the plates the first time he had to dress all in black and ride a black horse and go in the middle of the night and it's just the whole thing but yeah so Anthony sweat he he's not quite he's not quite historically accurate because it's you know it's daylight um he's not there's no hat or I mean he's got one on his head but he's not looking at it in the Hat so it's he's trying to spin it favorably like you said but he does have the stone in his hand yes isn't it weird how they all like white shirts like do you dig in a do you dig in like a white vest or white shirts maybe you do I don't know Joseph looks pretty fancy with his little vest on anyway okay well another like CES letter three you know yeah three to nothing apologist zero this is a picture that I I think these are really interesting this is I saw these as members of the church so you have two stones here that Anthony sweat has has painted one is just the white stone and the other one is the brown stone Joseph I think had as many as five or more sear Stones some of them were like um Native American type Stones the little hole in the middle um but these ones are just really interesting I don't know where I don't I don't know for sure if this church has the white one but I know they definitely have the brown one anyway just I don't see these depicted ever like this and so like very good of Anthony they at least paint them to show us what they what they look like and again the church hid these from the membership for a couple hundred years and just released them around the time the the gospel topics essays and the CES letter came out after Mormon stories and Mormon think and Grant Palmer and Fon Brody and Sandra Tanner you know Ma made noise about this you know right okay um what's this next one Julia okay so the image on the left is called the gift and power of God and I think Anthony sweat yes these are both Anthony sweat okay and then I think these were painted in 2014 again if somebody has a different date please tell me and then the one below is called translating with Oliver and he's yeah both by Anthony sweat and so these are just images we don't see at all really and then he's just like but even so so he's not quite putting his face in the Hat one of them one the one on the one below you don't see the plates at all which I think is interesting and then the other one on the right you can see or the on the table you can see the plates are kind of covered and can I make a point uh a couple of points there first it looks like it's says um sweat uh and then 2014 maybe on his signature so it might be worth zooming in looking at his signature and seeing if that a date to when he it does it does look like 2014 yeah but it could be 2019 so it's worth just having a look at that uh and then the other thing is I wonder to be kind to Anthony sweat here you know to try and be balanced whether when it comes to a painting you want a recognizable figure to make it engaging and I wonder whether that's one of the reasons he doesn't put the face all the way in the Hat oh I got you I swe so that you can see that that's Joseph Smith still because someone with their head and the hat might be more difficult to draw might be a bit less engaging just trying to be balanced um it is progress definitely that he's showing that he's looking into the Hat um but then there is the other side of it where it could just also be embarrassment and not wanting to show it in full that's true um I think I think even more interesting just as I just said like the the absence of the plates in one of the images is is very interesting to me but also that makes the left image somewhat deceptive because I don't know of any account where Joseph's looking into a hat and the plates are still in the room my understanding is all the accounts where Joseph's looking into the Hat with the stone in it the plates aren't anywhere in the room so this that left one feels still deceptive to me even though it's a step forward is that fair or not fair I think that's fair because he he's he's getting there to a point and then yeah trying to like you said favorable trying to make it the most favorable image okay yeah all right well uh so here oh what is this Julia so this is a presentation that he gave it's history and art meditating the rocky relationship by with Anthony sweat and he's bringing up he's talking about a concern that a student has concerning the searstone and is how he kind of answers the question and I just thought it was interesting enough to put it in here so now we're hearing from the man himself yep all right let's roll it this happens in our teaching of church history and Doctrine one day when I was wrapping up a class at BYU a student came to me uh afterward after we had looked at historical sources on the translation of the Book of Mormon and this sweet student came up to me uh and expressed her difficulty and then sent me Ana email about it and she said quote um when she learned about the stone on the hat she dismissed it and said to herself quote no that can't be true that's not what the illustrations of the translation look like this time in my life turned out to be a huge trial of my faith so I'm showing you these to show uh how art Alters our understanding of Doctrine our understanding of history and can even turn problematic for some people based on our depictions that we show right I have things to say about that all right I was so on board with him until that last sentence right wh what's wrong Nemo because he in that last sentence he puts all the blame on the people looking at the art he's like oh it can show how our Alters our perception and causes us you know and can be problematic for us it's like we're not the problem here the issue what he should be saying is this shows how when art isn't produced accurately or when the church doesn't produce art that accurately depicts things then that can cause problems for people it's subtle but I certainly the way I heard that last sentence was him saying the people are still the problem because the people saw the art and that altered their perception uh and they should have almost like known better or whatever maybe I'm being oversensitive there and people tell me in the comments if that's an unfair comment but that's how it felt to me was he was trying to blame the people not the fact that the church didn't produce appropriate artwork yeah I was when I was listening to him I was thinking like oh any anyone who's left the church or who is looking at this critically could say the same words to the church itself saying you're you're the ones who are commissioning these artists and you're the ones who are shaping Doctrine by showing incorrect depictions of of the translation process or anything really so yeah because I I was so on board of him to that point because I thought he was starting to make a very good point about how artwor does shape our understanding of scripture just like I did a video recently where people were coming after me saying oh you've you know you've linked together scriptures that don't go together I said well no the church's footnotes link those scriptures together and footnotes are there to help us understand what scriptures are saying so absolutely if the footnotes say something that's what the church wants you to understand by the scripture that you're reading and it's the same with the artwork if that's the artwork they put in front of you that's what they want you to understand by right the to be the case all right so again it looks like it's CES letter 4 uh critics of the Cs letter zero do we want to read what Jeremy said in the CES letter about yeah I'll take Jeremy go ahead unlike the story I've been taught Joseph Smith used a rock in a hat for translating The Book of Mormon he put a rock called a peep Stone in his hat and put his face in the Hat to tell his customers the location of buried treasure on their property he also used this same method for translating The Book of Mormon while the gold plates were covered placed in another room or even buried in the woods the gold plates were not used for the Book of Mormon we have today I think Jeremy's got it right so what what do you have there for Anthony on the right I'm actually can you read this one John okay so this is is this Anthony sweat himself yeah this is from Darkness unto light and the book the book is by McKay and Dirk matat who are over the U Joseph Smith papers I believe um and so yeah this is Anthony sweat they're quoting him I think in in the book itself okay so Anthony sweat himself says at least twice I have been approached by the church to do that scene Joseph translating using the hat so that shows the church is asking him to do it uh I get into it when I do the drawings I think this is going to look really strange to people culturally from our Vantage Point 200 years later it just looks odd it probably won't communicate what the church wants to communicate instead of a person being inspired to translate ancient records it will just be what's going on there some things just don't work visually tell me about it yeah I liked this quote and I think like he's saying oh from 200 years the Vantage Point 200 years it just looks it just looks a little weird looks odd pres ISM argument again isn't it right it was illegal it was illegal at the time because it was weird like I think people looked at it then and they thought it was odd like it's not just it's not just everyone in the 1800s thought it was fine no no no that's not true a lot of people thought it was weird and that's why it was published so much that's I really think that Joseph Joseph will say in his history that people fought against him because of his first vision and there's no evidence of that at all there's nothing published negatively about Joseph's First Vision the things that were published negatively were about Joseph Smith and his treasure digging and his searstone people thought that was so odd and so him saying it's presentism that's not that's not a valid argument well well because you know there were other Visions published around the time that Joseph was having his other similar Visions were getting published in newspapers people were talking about it it wasn't uncommon so yeah it wasn't wasn't as weird I think it's this is the same argument the church uses for polygamy right they try to make the argument that oh well people were getting married young back then as well and it's like well there was a reason they kept it secret because it was odd back then it's not like we're looking back and going oh polygamy from our modern Sensibility no polygamy was illegal in the state of Illinois in 1833 bamy was was was illegal already so it's not presentism and it's similar like you said it's with the the peep Stone Joseph was put on trial in 1826 for doing the thing that the church doesn't want to depict like it's not it's not doesn't look odd to us now he was on trial for it then it is odd and it was illegal yeah another another thing I want to add we we covered this in a previous LDS discussions episode and I just want to remind people these LDS discussions episodes are best consumed sequentially because they build on each other so we do recommend you go back to the very first episode and then watch them in order to get the full effect but we shared a quote by Benjamin Franklin that comes from like the 1770s where basically Benjamin Franklin is like they're these fraudulent huers that go around the countryside claiming they can SE Buried Treasure and they claim to have some type of magic artifact where they claim to be able to see in the ground blah blah blah and it's like literally Benjamin Franklin in like the 1770s talking about this whole treasure digging thing as a con as a scam and he publishes this in a Pennsylvania newspaper if I'm remembering it correctly so like even one of our core founding fathers did an expose on the illegality and the fraudulent nature this treasure digging stuff 60 years before Joseph Smith was uh was doing it your core founding fathers John bringing me into your americanisms there emo touche all right what's this next one Julia so this is something I've never seen depicted or I had never um all of it's called Oliver cowry and the gift of the rod by Anthony sweat and it's Oliver cowry he's in the middle of a field you'll see like a little forest in the back ground in its daylight and he's holding a wishbone shaped stick and he's just holding it each side with one hand and it's pointing him and he's walking and so that's you know that's just a very interesting I don't ever picture that whenever I picture Oliver cry well because this is the gift of the rod as it was mentioned in Scripture that was later changed to the gift of Aaron was it yeah if you skip to the next slide that explains it at all yeah and this I think goes back to his last point where he made where he saids it won't communicate what the church wants it to communicate and similarly this Revelation and the changes here would changes again because we almost we're forced to now accept by all this this s forced us to accept that the church knows that what it communicates what it puts out in artwork what it says to people is exactly that it's communication they're trying to send a certain message and you have to change Communications if you want a certain thing to be believed that's why the pictures of Joseph Smith are all very upright with a creat and holding scripture under his arm and big light behind him Etc not him stood around on a dig site with people digging for Treasure while he directs them it's not him digging in a they don't want that earthy version of Joseph Smith they didn't want that for years and this again is that folksy version of Oliver cry this folk magic thing that they don't want to communicate that's why this has never been painted before they they like to say that because he was he was a school teacher they like to tell that but they don't talk about that that he was also steeped in the magic worldview yeah and this is depicting that so sometime during the translation process all of cowry inquired of Joseph Smith if he might try to translate a portion of the gold plates in a revelation given in 1829 Joseph Smith says that Oliver had the gift of working with the Sprout meaning divining rods later this was changed to the gift of working with the rod and then finally it was changed to what we see today the gift of Aaron and then I have a little clipping in the corner of the actual paper from the Joseph Smith's Paper website where you can see that Sprout has been crossed out and then it says Rod over top and then of course it has been changed in our scriptures today to say the gift of Aron but there it is the church has provided the evidence there that that's what it was yeah yeah this is this is condemning for a couple reasons one is it's It's the weird folk magic creepiness stuff number two it's been hidden from us but number three it refers to I think one of our most important LDS discussions episodes where we show how just blatantly of Joseph Smith was willing to completely reverse or change or hide actual Revelations that were printed in the book of Commandments of the Doctrine and Covenants but in a Shameless way if a if a revelation didn't come true or he wanted to fix or ad or alter something he would literally just reverse the meanings of published scripture to say the opposite of what it originally said or add things to it that weren't there in the original version it's kind of Shameless uh what he was willing to do to manufacture or edit or change or add to scripture or Revelation so please make sure and check out that episode everybody all right so is this I always lose count is this six to nothing CES letter against its critics I can't remember what it is all right go a and read it Nemo if Oliver's if Oliver cry's gift was really the use of a divining rod and it was then this tells us that the origins of the church are much more rooted in folk magic and Superstition than we've been led to believe by the LDS church is whitewashing of its original of its Origins and history and that's Jeremy rynolds in the CES letter talking about Oliver calry and the divining Rod Julia what do you want to say about the right Anthony sweat is acknowledging Oliver cry's use of a divining Rod he acknowledges that early on the church was changing its Revelations and that the earliest sources say that Oliver had the gift of the rod and the gift of the power the gift of the Sprout and he talks about this in one of his his videos that he's done and I've left the time stamp in the in the title if you wanted to go and check that out but yeah he's he's acknowledging that the church has changing Joseph Smith has was changing the doctrines the revelations and and then uh he his depiction shows that as well that he really did have or Oliver kre believed he had the rod of the the gift of the Sprout I mean I know that this is an obvious point isn't it outrageous that Jeremy Reynolds was excommunicated for releasing a PDF that tells the same facts as what a BYU faculty member 10 years later can publish on the internet and paintings and be celebrated for the same type of thing they got Jeremy Reynolds excommunicated 10 years previous it's all about the spin it's all about the spin John like it's like I was told in my excommunication letter I wasn't excommunicated for raising concerns about the leaders of the church discussing those openly I was excommunicated because those were persuasive to people and people believed me when I said them and that wasn't good it was very much tone policing right it's how you say these things not what you say but I think it's also being the first to say it publicly you know what I mean like Michael Quinn he started publishing he was a faithful BYU Church employee who still to this day well he passed away recently but like until his dying day he was a believer in Joseph Smith's Divinity he was a believer in the Golden Plates all he did was publish like information on post- Manifesto polygamy which was you know polygamy ceremonies officiated by Prophet s and revelators after 1890 uh that happened and he published that along with the Magic World stuff and he was excommunicated in 1993 as a full believer right so it can be spined but it even doesn't have to be spined I think it can just be talking about factual truthful stuff too early well no that that my point was that the people that don't get excommunicated are the ones that put the appropriate spin on it right they're the ones that try and make it Faith promoting still and they can only do that because the they're coming from a position where the early adopter the person that brought it Forward has been punished for it but the church has to admit that it's true because they can't hide it anymore right so now the people that spin it to make it good for the church and and can make the church look open and like the church is actually addressing these things like Anthony sweat does they get praised for it got it okay yeah all right so the I I went back and counted it's five to nothing CES letter against his critics let's go to the next Anthony sweat painting So this painting is called the ordination of Q Walker Lewis by Anthony sweat and it's a black man and he's he's very well-dressed and he's got this white man's hands on his head and he's being given the priesthood and this is significant because it's it's a black man being ordained to the priesthood pream during Joseph Smith's lifetime yes if you skip to the next one I explain a little bit about Q Walker Lewis um so his name is quu Walker Lewis he was an ear early African-American abolitionist and Freemason he joined the church in 1842 he was the third black man known to hold the Mormon priesthood the first Was Elijah abble and the second Peter Kerr in the 1840s and 50s quu was part of the Underground Railroad in the anti-slavery movement which I thought was very interesting two months after quu arrived in this with the Saints to Salt Lake City Brigham Young legalized slavery in Utah quu then moved six months later back to his hometown in Massachusetts yeah yeah nope I'm out I didn't know that quu the apologist probably got his fake name from an actual black uh figure in Mormon history I was gonna say this is my favorite quu yeah I think quu really I think he did that on purpose right I don't I don't know what his actual name is but I think he I'm sure I think he was started as an actor like I think he didn't want his real name being used okay for his apologetic stuff I don't know if he's running from some history that he's embarrassed about or just wanted to protect his real name I don't know he should be embarrassed about what he's done under the name quu to be fair I mean those this is the show videos were were so embarrassing that fair took them down right um so interesting but yeah this is interesting that yeah Brigham Young legalizes slavery in Utah and quu Walker Lewis is like well I guess I'm out then I'm I'm off you know yeah assuming that's why he went back to me I feel like that's a fairly reasonable conclusion to draw maybe yeah all right so this is 660 and so we've got Jeremy rynolds uh talking about this in the CES letter you want to read that emo Joseph Smith permitt yeah Joseph Smith permitted the priesthood to at least two black men Elijah Abel was one of them Walker Lewis was another I would think Christ's one true church would have led the Civil Rights Movement not be the last major Church on the planet in 1978 to adopt it how can we trust these prophets seers and revelators who have been so wrong about so many important things for so long while claiming to be receiving Revelations from God yesterday's Doctrine is today's false Doctrine yesterday's prophets are today's Heretics I think it's we put a shout out in there for second class Saints and all the important work you guys have done talking about that book um I'm reading it it's a great book uh but yeah the church was very very late to adopt um the removal of the ban in 1978 um and this the the the idea that black people just never had the priesthood and they were always cursed is something the Cs letter challenges by stating that Joseph Smith did permit people to have the priesthood and Anthony SW if Jud reads the other side agrees yeah so Anthony sweat's depiction of the ordination of Walker Lewis acknowledges that the priesthood in Temple ban on blacks was not started with Joseph Smith but with Brigham Young and I'm glad you talked about um Matthew Harris's book second class Saints because he talks about the reason why this happened is because Brigham Young was so afraid of interracial marriage that black people would marry white people that he made the ban he put the ban into play and so that's that's so it's not it wasn't Joseph Joseph wasn't wasn't doing that but it was Brigham and this book here I you can see it's the way to Perfection by Joseph Fielding Smith right this book was full of uh justifications by Joseph pH Smith that his ancestor Joseph Smith was the one that started the ban right there was a narrative for a time that you will see in in Matthew Harris's book they tried to bring this justification not just to Brigham but all the way back to Joseph they tried to say it's from the beginning and that's why that's really important that that's in the CES letter undermining that narrative yeah please buy Matt Harris's book uh second class Saints uh black Mormons and the struggle for racial equality please check out our 17p part series that book way to Perfection was literally uh commissioned because Mormon church prophets and revelators kind of woke up in the early 1900s where everybody's asking wait a minute why was that priesthood B implemented again where's the Revelation oh there's no revelation oh wait there's descendants of Elijah Abel who got the priesthood who are black that want the priesthood today because their grandpa had it what do we do okay let's commission and publish a book written by an apostle that tries to enshrine the priesthood ban as Doctrine because there's no evidence that there was ever a revelation or anything doctrinal about the priesthood band so check out that book and check out that very important series all right so I think this is is this 60 uh Anthony sweat confirming the CES letter we already read this right yeah okay all right okay so this next one is called an angel with a drawn sword by Anthony sweat and you have Joseph's kneeling down it looks like he's in the in a field or forest or something and he's got a book open the feet the foot of an Angel and the angel you can see his little Halo and then he's got a um what are those called or measuring what do you call that like a scale a scale yeah he's holding a scale SC yeah he's holding a scale in one hand and then a sword a drawn sword in the other it's a very interesting picture of and what are they Julia what are they trying to depict here what actual historical so if you go to the next slide so what's happening here is the Angel is giving the command that Joseph should live polygamy as far as what Joseph Smith is telling so so Joseph Smith told several men and women that an angel came to him with a drawn sword sometimes it's called flaming sword and told that if he did not establish the principle of plural marriage upon the Earth Joseph would lose his position and his life and so I made this list I gathered this list Joseph told this story to at least the following people his brother hyam who told Benjamin Johnson di M hunington who relay the message to his sister Zina Joseph Bates Noble who married Joseph to Louisa Beeman Elizabeth Whitney who along with her husband gave him permission to marry their daughter Sarah Anne Lorenzo Snow Eliza AR snow Lorenzo's sister HEB SE Kimble Helen Mar Kimble heber's daughter Orson F Whitney Benjamin F Johnson Joseph Lee Robinson Orson Pratt arasa snow and Mary Elizabeth Rollins and so these are the names that I gather that were aware of this story of Joseph saying this Angel is going to kill me if you don't practice polygamy if you don't marry me or if you don't have your sister marry me or your daughter marry me this is what he was telling them and and one of those names to me at least they're all egregious right because they're all trying to use the weight of God as a threat against the life of Joseph uh to say look if you don't if you don't do this I'm going to die right but one of those is a 14year old right hel Mar Kimble oh sorry several months shy of her 15th birthday um she's a 14year old and that that's that alone the fact whether they had sexual relations or not any of that other stuff the fact that Joseph Smith said to a 14-year-old girl if you don't enter into this arrangement with me I'm GNA get killed is just completely wrong manipulative inappropriate whatever word you want to use it's not right also it kind of takes away this idea of agency because I think I think the you know the church you know you know I don't know if brags is the right word they say that you know God gave us agency and he's never going to take that away and it's Satan's plan to remove agency but if if you're if the pro the mouthpiece for God is coming up to you especially as a 14-year-old saying if you don't marry me God is going to kill me that kind of takes away her agent yeah and and Ronald a rasband did a um did a I think it was rasband yeah uh or renland was it renland it was renland did a talk about uh unfairness about terrible unfairness he then went on to talk about the genocide in Rwanda about it as being a matter of incredible unfairness which is just beyond being toned deaf that talk was all about how do we respond when the agency of others impacts our life our lives and he was talking about how all these terrible things happen through the agency of others right but yet God chose this moment to intervene in Joseph Smith's agency and not allow him to use his agency in his conscience to say no to marrying 14-year-old girls he instead went no if you don't do what I say I will strike you down with an angel on a flaming sword and we can think about other instances like the Rwanda genocide that renland brought to the four in that talk that he described as unfairness where were the angels with flaming swords to stop that a gency from impacting people's lives and causing suffering on a much bigger scale than just Joseph not being able to marry 14y olds that's that's a I think is a valid question or women who are already married yes or women who are already married another another way to say it is just like if God's Gonna you know let's just say God has a limited number of opportunities to send an angel with the Flaming sword to force his children to do things I can think of a gazillion better moments in world history where God could have sent an angel with the Flaming sword send an angel with the Flaming sword to threaten Hitler not to you know perform the Holocaust send an angel with the Flaming sword uh you know to to tell Brigham don't you dare take the priesthood away from black men and Temple blessings away from black women uh you know P the Mountain Meadows Massacre yeah yeah like John D Lee and and uh all those all those involved don't you dare go and Massacre 80 or 100 men women in children there're just so many better if if God's GNA be sending angels with flaming swords how about you know uh teaching germ Theory like every person in the world wash your hands you know before and after you know you eat or when you go to bathroom or before after any medical procedure like think of all the opportunities had um to use an angel with the Flaming sword and he's going to do it conveniently when Joseph is is sort of hot sexually and looking for more sexual partners he's conveniently only going to send the angel with the Flaming sword frankly to help Joseph get laid you know I'm reminded of Mike's I feel like one of his things he says often is he says if you if you separate yourself from the religion and you just hear this as if it's not Mormonism and it's just some other SE sect or action you would not accept it it would be it would be ridiculous to be like oh this man is obviously making this story up he's obviously just trying to get what he wants to what why whatever means necessary but when you are raised in the church and when you have invested so much time and energy into the church or even joined it later like this is a it's a harder to separate yourself from this type of story and I just like that Mike says that and yeah that's good all right so I think this is seven 70 where Anthony sweat is confirming what's in the CES letter Nemo do you want to read Jeremy in the CES letter so Jeremy said some of the marriages to these women included Promises by Joseph of eternal life to the girls and their families or threats that he Joseph was going to be slain by an Angel with a drawn sword if the girls didn't marry him I have a problem with this this is Warren Jeff's territory this is not the Joseph Smith I grew up learning about in the church and having a testimony of this is not the Joseph Smith to whom I sung praise to the man or taught others about for two years in the mission field what do you have on the right Anthony SWAT acknowledges that based on the research done by Brian hails there are at least 20 reminiscences of an angel with a drawn sword coming to Joseph Smith commanding him that he needed to implement the practice of polygamy or he would lose his prophetic mantle calling or position that's an interesting slight of hand there by Anthony right he doesn't go so far as to say that the Angels threatened to kill Joseph he doesn't admit that in his statement he just says oh they would take away his prophetic mantle they would take away his calling as the prophet yeah well the the directag quote is lose his position and his life I think it's I think hey Kimble says that but yeah he missed that out yeah yeah he did just want to call him on that and again you know if he's gonna be bold like okay give him credit or the church credit for commissioning some partially uh more accurate or authentic versions of art to reflect the history if he's going to be bold show Joseph with helar Kimble do a painting of Joseph propositioning Helen Mar Kimble for polygamy or show Joseph A artistic rendering of him with his 34 wives or you know sending a man off on a mission so that he can proposition that man's wife that would be a lot more bold than like doing the angel with the Flaming sword depicting that without any connection to Joseph's uh you know uh predatory plural marriages yeah yeah right so somehow Anthony hasn't gotten that bold yet you know who who would be some of the polyandrous wives that Joseph uh propositioned you know women married other men Z Huntington her sister Jo yeah Anthony sweat show a painting of Joseph with Zina Huntington yeah or Sylvia lion or there's a whole bunch um yeah yeah W Pratt's wife Pratt yeah yeah yeah okay well we've got the next one so this one's called uh this is this is showing the destruction of the NAU Expositor by Anthony sweat and you see the building of the nov Expositor and there's a huge bonfire and it's there people are surrounding men are surrounding the bonfire holding up um either Firearms or or torches yeah and and this is obviously problematic historically because it's Joseph as the mayor and as the Chief Justice of navu and as the head of the Nauvoo Legion it's people responding to Joseph Smith's command to destroy the printing press to violate the First Amendment of the United States to destroy the press that printed the one single edition of the newspaper where William law uh tells the world that Joseph's been lying that Joseph has been sleeping with other men's with women married other men sleeping with teenagers and he's been hiding and lying about it and Joseph was so worried that that newspaper would get out that he commanded violated the First Amendment of the United States the freedom of the press and ordered a printing press destroyed so yeah Kudos that they're now depicting it right he declared it a public nuisance didn't he yeah this is random but I wanted to point out so I've been to NAU so many times it's we're not very far from it I'm in Missouri but so the in the picture you see the sun setting and in reality that's where the temple is so if you think about how close the NAU Expositor building is to the Mormon to the NAU Temple it's it's very very close I've never I never pictured that before as a member that it was just right behind the temple I I think this is also interesting because the the death of Joseph Smith is painted as I I I go as a lamb to the slaughter right I'm calm as a summer's day that's the quote isn't it something like that um this idea that Joseph was innocent and he was Trump on the Trump up charges and he was in jail because he'd done nothing wrong this is now an admission that here's the event that put Joseph Smith in jail right here or the plus the polygamy yeah the events that followed from this plus the the polygamy which was illegal which was illegal which and the polygamy which caused this uh William law to to talk about this because he felt you know betrayed that that Joseph Smith had been doing this and he didn't agree with it so he puts this out Joseph destroys it then Joseph refuses to let the the the federal government come in and try and sort out what's going on which means it's then treason which means he then goes to Carthage um and the church say oh there was some promises broken he should have been kept safe all this sort of stuff he was only in jail because he was doing things that were a eagle and this is one of those things of a printing press and publicly lying about it right yeah yeah but even even if he hadn't been my point is even if he hadn't been committing Pol even if he hadn't been doing that even if he just ordered the destruction of a printing press for no reason that in itself is still a legal and that was what led to the state coming in and going oh yeah the federal government coming in and going what's going on here in NAU this man's looking too powerful there's a timot dictator who's judge jury and executioner and he had the largest militia in the world at the time I think yeah yeah so so a genuine legitimate threat to the stability of the union and they yeah coming in trying to sort it all out or in the country exactly all right so I think is this seven or eight seven I don't remember we keep losing track all right so this is Jeremy ronals in the CES letter go ahead Nemo Joseph Smith did everything he could to keep the practice of polygamy secret from the church and the public in fact Joseph's desire to keep this part of his life a secret is what ultimately contributed to his death when he ordered the destruction of the navu Expositor which dared publicly expose his private behavior in June 1844 this event initiated a chain of events that ultimately led to his death at the Carthage Jail yeah then Anthony SWAT acknowledges that the navu Expositor was destroyed for a number of reasons including exposing his practice of polygamy plural marriage was directly involved in the death of Joseph Smith and that's Anthony sweat yeah absolutely okay let's go to the next one so this one is a very interesting image to me it's called Purgatory Joseph Emma and the Revelation on plural marriage and this you see Joseph Smith is sitting in front of a fire it's a very it's very dimly lit the fireplace you can see all the bricks everywhere and he's sitting in a chair and he's holding a paper of Revelation and Emma is standing in front of him with her arms crossed and neither of them look very [Laughter] happy this is probably an understatement because I'm guessing Emma probably resulted in Rage probably threw stuff probably hit Joseph like you thought she was mad about the tobacco in the school of the prophets yes or the alcohol in her house yeah yeah did she throw it in the fire like there's different versions of this because there's a version where um ham says he's gonna give her the Revelation and then she I think Burns it from him and then Joseph says you don't know Emma like I do um I don't know exactly what what images is taking um but as far as I know I think somebody delivered the message her and it wasn't Joseph directly but I don't I could be wrong and y'all will have to check out the LDS discussions episodes about uh this but one of the reasons she's mad is because she finds out that Joseph had already married 22 women he had already sealed himself to 22 women and had sex with a number of them before he ever even gave this Revelation to Emma well I don't know when she found finds out exactly cuz like cuz they had that fax wedding for the the the sisters yes and so she wasn't aware that he had married them so they had to they had to redo the ceiling or a fake ceiling I should say so I don't know how aware she was whenever he gave it wasn't she like the 23rd wife sealed to Joseph as far as my numbers I think it's 20 I thought it was 26 as far as what um some in the mid 20s right right right so she's Furious not just because he got the Revelation but because he started practicing it years previous hit it from her lied to her about it and now he's adding her is the 20 whatever 25th wife when when the de when the Revelation that he's holding says has what's called The Law of Sarah where God says the first wife needs to be able to consent to subsequent wives and even if she says no she'll then be destroyed but she at least gets an opportunity to say no oh my gosh and the Revelation the word destroyed I think is 11 times in in the Revelation itself yeah the word love is zero um and that's why people need to check out our episode on DNC 132 because yeah just how evil God is for supplying that Revelation where he talks about women as cattle where he threatens Emma with destruction what kind of God is literally going to tell a woman if you don't let your husband have sex with 30 other women many of them teenagers are married to other men I'm going to destroy you like what kind of God you know acts that way and there's so much wrong with the heading of DNC 132 where it tries to couch things and and say and soften the blow and say oh well although revealed in you know the 1840s this was known to Joseph some of this as early as possibly 1831 right so they're trying to cover the scope of the F algia Affair in 1835 and and all this sort of stuff they're trying to say oh he was he knew about this throughout um but ultimately what this does and this painting does is it undermines what we were shown in Joseph Smith prophet the restoration this one loyal woman by Joseph's SM by Joseph's side his true love that he had to alope with because Isaac halil was mad with him for some reason who knows why but he just didn't approve of Joseph um you know there's legitimate reasons why there as we know now but again none of it re shows or gives any inclination that actually what Joseph was doing was having one big long protracted Affair over nearly 10 years that his wife didn't know about or certainly didn't know about fully and then when this Revelation finally comes out she kind of gets added to the Haram spiritually way later down the line he didn't prioritize her and make her the first that he'd be sealed to um and the thing I always feel the need to mention DNC 132 says that polygamy is explicitly for providing bodies to Bear The Souls of men right and Joseph Smith didn't have children with any of his polygamous wives so he couldn't even even follow the rules of the Revelation he gave to try and justify his behavior right which is just bizarre to me well and then from Emma perspective I was going to add the Release Society started in March of 1842 and she doesn't hear about this Revelation I think until 43 and while while she's the release SED president she's hearing rumors about Joseph Smith starting polygamy you have John C bennon who's publishing his expose in 1842 and she's she's completely in denial that it's happening and then here her husband is handing her this Revelation saying yeah doing it I'm I'm living polygamy and God says I need to be doing it and you can understand how Furious she's becoming because she's been backing her husband and and defending him for a year or more and now she's finding out that that's not the case that she doesn't she doesn't know who she's married to in a way so you had this follow on slide Julia yeah so while Joseph Smith had been taking wives for years the first was Fanny algar happening in 1835 um little evidence exists that Emma was aware of her husband's polygamy at least until May of 1843 during this month Emma participated in four of Joseph Smith's plural marriages Eliza Partridge Emily Partridge Sarah Lawrence and Mariah Lawrence by this time Joseph had taken at least 19 wives the reev the Revelation on polygamy was not introduced to Emma until July of 1843 and I would just ask the women of the church to just stop and think about that even if you believe God did it even if you believe that God told Joseph to behave like this you've just got to feel sad for Emma that she didn't know about this and imagine if your husband was told by God to do that for all these years and then you found out after wife number 19 and then you felt that you got some control over the situation by at least getting to choose some of them or you know approve some of them nominally just just like we told to liken the scriptures unto ourselves if you're sat here going oh well you know God told him to do it so he had to fine but at least be aware of the human cost of this and and sit with the human cost of this and liken it to yourself imagine what you would feel if this were you that's that's what I would say to that really I would add God says in his own scriptures according to Mormons that he's not a god of confusion well if God can appear to Joseph if God can produce scripture God can give Joseph the Revelation in 1830 or 1832 or whenever Joseph's going to begin he can give the rules up front and he can you know require send an angel with the Flaming sword to force Joseph to follow the actual Revelation so all of that should cast suspicion on the legitimacy of this so what's Anthony got to say Julia I think here he's talking about um his his choice to depict Emma and Joseph in that in that moment by the fireplace he's talking about the idea of of painting controversial aspects of church history all right let's roll the clip uh not all of my images are mantlepiece images uh I like to paint things that are even uncomfortable president Kimble and his classic talk on um The Gospel vision of the Arts said that we should also paint and portray the difficulties the the apostasies the uh the arguments and so this is literally an argument I wanted to a painting of when Joseph Smith brought home the revelation we know is the Revelation on Eternal and plural marriage in section 132 of the Doctrine and Covenants um I want to do an image of the difficulties trying to express the difficulties that showed in Joseph and Emma's marriage wait that was just a that that was just an a portrayal of women doing a washing and anointing did you notice that Julia well yeah we're going to talk about that soon too okay okay all right yeah okay yeah so here I just wanted to he's quoting Kimble and he's saying we should depict other things maybe ones that aren't so rosy as far as church history and then on the next slide there's the full quote there okay oh wait uh let me um sorry my uh my slide's acting up give me just one second um we're getting there 40 thank you for holding oh yeah 4 okay there we go all right so there's Kimble's quote thanks do you one of you guys want to read it yeah I'll do that uh for years I have been waiting for someone to do justice in recording in song and story and painting and sculpture the story of the restoration the reestablishment of the kingdom of God on Earth the struggles and frustrations the apostasies and inner revolutions and counter Revolutions of those first Decades of The Exodus of the counter actions of the transitions of the persecution days of the Miracle Man Joseph Smith of whom we sing Oh what Rapture filled his bosom for he saw the Living God and of the Giant colonizer and Builder Brigham Young so here was that so the prophet Spencer Kimble is saying we should we should paint all the things paint all the things paint the the hard things the good things just do all of it and what we're seeing is the church is not doing that the church is not taking the prophet's uh suggestion and just showing what they are the most comfortable showing and if the next slide I think is when is uh this is me so this is from my channel and the church recently I I explained it in the video but I can explain it again so the church recently released two videos called days of Harmony and then um I can't remember the other one um but they're depictions of the of the beginning of Mormonism the the translation process and then um other aspects of it and so they during the translation one they try to show um images of the stone and hat um and then I this I I explained it in the show in the video but in the short but all right let's go and roll it okay so in 2016 just months after the kuv and aoic Tribune published rare pictures of Joseph Smith searstone the first time that pictures of a searstone had ever been published the church released two films one was called days of Harmony and the other was called a day for the eternities these two films are shown in many of the church's visitor centers where members and non-members can learn more about church history during the filming pictures were taken of Joseph Smith in the translation process pictures like this and this and even this however from what I can find these pictures were not actually released to the public until 2018 when the church released this film with historian Mark ashurst McGee now I could be wrong but from what I can find these images were not released until two years after the films were published the thing that gets me is that when this film was released in 2016 what made it into the Final Cut is so different than the 2018 pictures here let me show you these next clips are every single time Joseph Smith's white top hat made it into the final cut the sear Stone which is presumably inside the YTP hat was never depicted in either of these films Za did you catch that let me slow it down a little bit now these are all the clips from a day for the eternities where it chose Joseph Smith's white top hat [Music] did you catch it again I'm gonna slow this down for [Music] you it's interesting to me that the church waited until 2016 to finally depict Joseph Smith using a rock and a hat and that it took them another two years to make those depictions public it seems as that the church is trying really hard not to show The Rock in a hat almost as if they're ashamed of it almost as if they want to hide it that was that was really good jul reminds me of those I don't if you've seen those uh reals doing the rounds where it's like Lord of the Rings if it was just every time two female characters interact yes it's like one word spoken between two women and then cuts to credits directed by Peter Jackson um it's the same thing there essentially right is is is that's insane and I've got an image in my head somewhere and someone in the comments uh reach out and tell me where I might be plugging this from or if either of you two know I've got an image in my head somewhere of like a grainy shot of someone's editing screen showing that this was part of the original edit and was actually chopped out that you can see it as part of an editing timeline I don't know where that image in my mind is from but I feel like there is a story out there somewhere about how those images were part of the original edit and they were cut from the original edit of the film because they didn't want to show them and then that's where those Stills have then come from for later well I feel like that's the point I'm trying to make is that like absolutely is but I think there's some evidence somewhere of it actually getting like cut onto The Cutting Room floor somewhere but interesting in the recesses well I mean the pictures exist and they the props were there they just cut those parts out so like the church and those were recently done 2016 and so like the church is still to this day trying really hard to to to give that curated image of Joseph Smith you know not using this magic worldview stuff yeah it's the same as like when Russell goes to put his head in the Hat and then doesn't I I often wonder whether it was him realizing it doesn't look good or whether his Handler stood off screen is like Noe stop no don't don't do it either way it shows the church like you said is probably embarrassed of it yeah and it's not going to what is it it's not going to communicate what the church wants it to communicate as Anthony sweat said yeah it's also worth noting that Kimble s Kimble would have made that quote he died in the 80s so he would have made that quote in the 70s or 80s so why did it take the church so long to follow its profet right right exactly and then kind of still try really hard to not follow him right yeah so what's this clip we're about to see Julia um yeah I I watched it just before we push record and I I remember being really good but I should have put a title um but this is Anthony sweat again the title of this one is called the jesting our eyes Latter-Day Saints and they're developing religious imagery all right let's play it right that's not what they look like they look like this they almost always showed Joseph sitting with open plates with his uh finger studiously on the plates as though the Book of Mormon translation was some sort of an academic translation or inter R I tried to say to the student you know upfront by the way that these images are not historically accurate um because you have been taught from the time you were a child that Joseph translated The Book of Mormon by means of urum and Thum however you want to Define that and none of these images show the Y and thumm uh some of the research that I've done is actually looked at how the church in the enzy from 1971 when I published this article in 2014 was how they used um uh The Book of Mormon it was depicted 55 times in the enzy used 17 different paintings and every one of them Joseph was shown looking into open plates and 11 of them he has his finger on the plates and only in one painting ever produced was Joseph shown using the yman thumb and it was this one that was produced by Gary Smith I actually talked to Gary Smith about this painting and uh you can see Joseph in his right hand holding what looked like the spectacles and he said that uh the church actually asked him to redo the painting later and uh had him remove the spectacles because they felt like they were too sacred to show oh yeah that's that's what it was that's why yeah too sacred absolutely not secret guys just sacred um yeah I have a I have a question for him actually about that which is he talked about through to 2014 um which I don't know when that video was produced maybe that's all he had up to but I swear there is an enzyme where the front cover is with some spectacles am I that's one of the images that we've certainly shown on these slides um it's the quite serious Joseph with the spectacles yeah I'm pretty sure that's true but then the other thing is right he goes oh well I've only looked at when it was depicted in the enzyme but why because em Russell Ballard was trying to say oh in the 1970 Church magazines Millennial star whatever that was at that point he's trying to say oh look we see we talked about it in the church magazines in 1970 about the multiple First Vision accounts so why is Anthony limiting his scope of search to just the enzy in 1971 why is he not looking back further at other depictions because if we're looking to how the church depicted the first Vision back then and that's really important and we should look all the way back there then why is not why is Anthony not looking all the way back there for the history of how these things were depicted to us true it's also just really really gross and deceptive and unkind that he just won't take a minute to sayou know what we've got egg on our face because you know people like Sandra Tanner and F Brody and others you know were trying to get the church to be honest and come clean about this for decades and unfortunately the church just wasn't ready to tell the truth and so we kind of do owe um you know current visibility current honesty and transparency to people that you know were punished and and kind of made casualties for fighting for true and honest depictions like it would be classy to to just acknowledge that the church was drug you know crying and screaming to be honest in its depictions but they just act like those people never existed that Jeremy and Sandra and fawn and and Grant Palmer and others you know uh were punished uh to make it possible such that now they can speak honestly today and and also again we've got this anony sweat victim blaming thing going on where he's saying you know these aren't historically accurate right because you've been taught since the beginning that he used the uran thumim and none of them include the uran thumim and implied in that is so you should have all you should have clocked that these weren't accurate anyway before the other thing that we hid from you about the rock in a hat you should have already known that these weren't accurate so why are you surprised that they're not accurate and why are you surprised then that they didn't include do you know what I mean I'm getting that right exactly there's that oh you should have seen it yeah all right well here's another quote from Spence Kimble Julia regardless of President Kimble's call to do justice in painting this painting the story of the restoration according to Anthony sweat the church specifically reached out to an artist Gary Smith and asked him to remove his depiction of the spectacles or uran thma even in their recent films days of Harmony and a day for the eternities the church was not fully transparent with Joseph Smith's use of a stone and hat and so and like the the yman Thum is is published in the scriptures but the church says please take it out um the church was all ready and prepped to have these scenes in this film and they're like nope take it out we don't like this this is not this will not help the people this is what I'm imagining this will not help the audience to feel the spirit and to believe that this is the true church and again this con condemns contradicts Elder Ballard's claim that they're as honest as they know how to be and that they've never HIIT anything because it's obvious this is just another example of a gazillion that they that they have and they did and they still are you know right okay so here's where that here's where that other image comes in that you were talking about so this is other depictions from Anthony SWAT that that are not CS letter yeah they're not in the Cs letter yeah so this one is called Relief Society healing by Anthony sweat and it's a woman in bed and she's surrounded by three other women and a child and one of them is anointing her head with oil and and then the other one is getting I guess water or something ready for her so what I I don't know this woman looks like Washings I think it's Washings and anointings oh Washings and anointings you're right okay so often what would happen and this woman doesn't look like she's pregnant or anything she looks like she might be ill but with that the women would go to these other women and they would wash and anoint them and they would do that in preparation for childbearing as well and they would give them priesthood blessings and sometimes even the prophet I can't remember which one but he would go with his wife pretty often and they would go and give blessings of healing one would one would give the first part and the other one would give the other part of the blessing and so like it was very common for these women to use the mezic priesthood and D Michael Quinn in his research he says that he speculates that in the endowment ceremony women are just like kind of automatically given this mezic priesthood and because that's the only thing that could make sense to him and that I mean it makes sense to me whereas the men I think I don't know how this Temple works with them with the men's side but you guys are actually ordained to um M I don't know how that works um so that doesn't happen with the women but the women used the priesthood up until for really a long time and then end the 19 end of the 1900s yeah for sure and then the the leaders were saying no I mean if you need a blessing go to the elders but they didn't ban it they just said go to the elders first and then eventually they started taking away the this right or this um ability of the women and so that's what Anthony sweat is depicting here is women using the priesthood and I'm I'm so torn with Anthony sweat like through all this because on the one hand he's kind of a badass for painting this and kind of putting it in front of people and going yeah I know women used to do this let's not minimize the role that women played in the early Church in the way that they used to interact but he seems to get away with it by essentially throwing the audience under the bus by going well I'm just painting stuff that you guys should have already really known about and you know I'm just yeah it's your fault if the old artwork LED you to believe something that wasn't quite true and I'm just putting out do you know what I mean he's like that seems to how he's getting away with it because I I can't understand how else he's getting away with it because what he's doing here is he's showing stuff that the church doesn't really want out there as we've proven with the way that they've hidden things right so I I am I'm really torn and maybe some more of these will help me come to a conclusion by the end but I wanted to share that before I forgot also I just want to share if you want to read uh and article which goes into detail on women doing Washings and anointings and blessing the sick invoking the priesthood using sacred oil The Source article that I think is the best it's called a gift given a gift taken washing anointing and blessing the sick among Mormon women by Linda King new who I think also was a co-author on Mormon Enigma the biography on uh Emma Smith yeah so that's that's the the reference reference there and it's something the church is hidden because they're trying to disempower women and so they don't want modern Mormon women to know that they used to have the power to heal the sick and now they can't do it anymore but women have the most power in in the Mormon Church than any other church now we've gone too far Julet J Anette Dennis right okay so this one this one is a very interesting one to me this one's called Michael detecting the Devil by Anthony sweat and you have the image of Joseph he looks like he's kind of crouched down he's kind of near the banks of the river and then you have an angel who's looks like he's might be casting out this other character who is the devil he's got black on and a red coat and so yeah that was just I've just never seen this depicted before has he modeled the devil there after Michael balum or himself they look very similar to me the Angel and the devil look very similar yeah but the Devils definitely give me Michael balam Vibes or Anthony sweat Vibes or Anthony sweat Vibes true that would be very okay so what what is the story that this is so if if you go to the next slide it shows this historical um story so this is from I think the revelations I think it's directly from the doctrine covenants and again what do we hear Glad Tidings from kamora Moroni an angel from heaven declaring the Fulfillment of the prophets the book of the book to be revealed a voice of the Lord in the the Wilderness of fet senica County declaring the three witnesses to Bear record of the book The Voice of Michael on the banks of the sesana detecting the devil when he appeared as an angel of Light the voice of Peter James and John in the wilderness between Harmony sasana County and kville broom county on the sasana river declaring themselves as possessing the Keys of the Kingdom and of the dispensation of the fullness of times and I did not leave a reference but I'm pretty sure it's from the doctrine covenants okay and that's I mean the doctrine covenants does that weird part where it's like how do you detect a righteous angel or Spirit from an evil one and it's you offer to shake the hand and if they did if they refuse to shake the hand then it's a good spirit that's not resurrected and and if it goes to shake your hand and then you can't feel the hand then it's a deceptive evil spirit that's literally in the doctrine in covenants today right um so that's I think that's associated with this story right yeah anyway just kind of weird of folk magicky kind of stuff and then this one is called first baptisms for the dead by Anthony sweat and I think I have a slide on it next but um the interesting thing here so this is so on the horse there's FNA jock she's one of Joseph's later plural wives but the woman getting baptized she's getting baptized for her deceased 5-year-old son if I'm not mistaken so a woman is getting baptized for a male even though it's her son and so burgamy did is he was like no we're not doing that if you're male you do work for males and if you're female you do work for females and and they and he's like and you have to do it in the temple whereas before Joseph was like he wasn't he wasn't segregating the genders and he wasn't making everything have to be done in the temple um here they're doing baptisms out in out in the SES River I think and then even a lot of the ceilings yeah and the witness is a woman you're right and then uh yeah so there's just a lot of differences between how Joseph ran the church and how baman ran the church which that's really interesting because you know how the church claims to be a restoration of the Gospel of Jesus Christ right um it is really interesting that Joseph Smith allowed women to be witnesses to baptisms and it took the church until the 2020s to allow women once again to be witnesses to baptisms like it was some Revelation and they were empowering women whatever they were just putting back something that they took away that had been put back originally so it's like it's doing a really bad job of being a restoration if they restore something and then take it away again for like a good 150 nearly years un restoring the restoration exactly then bringing it back same with the PRI with the black members it's like Joseph gave it taken away and then 1978 yeah yeah it's a very backwards but this one took until the 2020s to come back yeah I have to note it's not a particularly courageous artistic depiction because to any other Observer it just looks like a baptism right yeah right which is what I yeah if it had like a spirit above it who who is like nodding in in thanks as if it's someone in spirit prison or a little teleprompter with a card slid into twt I blah blah blah for behalf of blah blah blah you know do baptize you indeed all right something to make it clear that's what it is you know right I mean it's a baby step so we'll give him a baby step yeah and yeah it was for her son so um the first recorded baptism was performed by James Harvey Olstead who's the man in the water who baptized Jane Jane Neiman in behalf of her recently departed son Cyrus and then as I said Vanna Jo was a witness anyway so I just think you know without without knowing that it doesn't really look like very a bold picture but knowing that like this woman is a witness that now women or women couldn't be women she was getting baptized for her son women can't do that anymore yeah all right yeah well having the woman as a witness is actually a bold a bold artistic move yeah yeah because it's basically signaling to Modern Mormon feminists that they should be asking to be Witnesses oh but now they right they've got it now now they've got it yeah okay so that's a change that the church made after ordain women basically it was a few years ago but they they were allowed to be witnesses to baptisms like live and proxy baptism like the crumbs that they gave Mormon women in response to yeah but to the point right they it's the crumbs of something that they had yeah like nearly 200 years ago got taken away from them crumb given a crumb Tak it away yes right all right what's this one Julia this one NE and I were debating on which ones to keep in this one is called after Liberty by Anthony sweat and he it's a picture of Joseph and it doesn't look like the Joseph that we're familiar with he looks very Haggard he looks very worn down oh his pants are like torn his jacket's all his his jacket looks really rugged and his face is he's got covered in hair it's just not a very similar it's not a very like normal depiction of Joseph but this is after he's been in Liberty jail for however long he was there modeled the facial hair off me and me I know I've just yeah I'm seeing my own beard in that man no mine's gray so it yours is nor because I'm old I'm old as dirt I'm 55 old as dirt okay well that's that's uh that's interesting at least Joseph's not like white chiseled chin you know Brad Pit Brad Pit Joseph Smith right and that's why I really liked it that's why why this one kept in was because like like this is almost y to depict Joseph Smith in this way right to to not depict him as glorious and and bold he looks like a river guide yeah yeah looks like he's just he he he does a ferry he's a ferryman right yeah Fairman yeah okay all right what's this next one this next one's called washing the feet of the in the school of the prophets by Anthony sweat and I just think that's a really interesting normally this is associated with the second anointing where they're washing the feet and I'm pretty sure he's Wasing I don't know who that is that looks like his dad in the background too and and Oliver cry so as Joseph sees down and he's Wasing the feet of his his these members here I think they're Apostles but anyway that just made me think of the of the second anointing how no for sure I'm remembering my interview with Brian Buchanan about the history of the second anointing and he he basically if I remember right attributes the Washings and anointings in Kirtland as the precursor to the full uh um second learning later describes it as an evolution right okay yeah well that's how Joseph seems to do everything is through an evolution of yeah okay yeah so so second anointing basically which I just you know the church doesn't talk about that the church in fact in their manuals they say don't talk about the second anointing at all like if anyone talks about it don't don't bring it up and here yeah that is kind of edgy of of sweat to show that because there he is bringing that up okay good job Anthony SW we'll give you credit on that one okay context behind it in order to understand yeah yeah so these are it's it's eight things um so that they both I guess you can say agreed on so the contradictions with the first Vision the plates were not used during during the translation Joseph Smith using a sear Stone to translate The Book of Mormon Joseph Smith was hired as a treasure Seer Oliver cryy used a divining Rod the priest had ban on black members of the church pamy and the angel with a drawn sword Joseph Smith ordered the destruction of the navu Expositor and I think I think it may be more because you don't have the I don't think you have the the polygamy Revelation there which was the last one we showed this one well so I say polygamy and the angel with a drawn sword so maybe you could see them as two separate things oh so you consolidate yeah right okay yeah because I I think there might be at least 10 or 11 oh sure yeah there's probably a lot yeah yeah Okay cool so yeah yeah thank you Anthony sweat for validating so many aspects of of Jeremy rynolds CS letter and thank you Jeremy for getting it right and Having the courage to express legitimate concerns that modern Mormon apologists want to invalidate by claiming that Jeremy didn't have sincere concerns which is so silly like if you can't if you can't attack the arguments is making because they're being supported by documents and by professors then attack the person because that's that makes the most sense right yeah like no if you watch his interviews with you he's he was very sincere in trying to seek out answers to his questions yeah yeah I think this is a good time to bring up um so for a long time uh you know we were mad that uh that these apologists were uh that they had grabbed the domain named cesl letters.com or cesl letters.org and uh that they were doing an SEO play both to directly attack CES letter but also to use a derivative of the name CS letter to try and redirect people and this is the first episode where we can now formerly announced that the CES letters people caved and they have now changed the name so if you go to CES letters now cesl letters.com it redirects to the Church of jesuschrist.org um and and and uh they caved and so they've now renamed their campaign and the CES letters campaign no longer um exists they they they ran away with their tail uh their what what them to Cave what's the back story okay so there's CSL letters.org see that check that out guys oh my gosh so if you go to Google now it's because of us and also I think because Jeremy started to threaten them with the trademark lawsuit I believe because now if you here's it cs.org you click on it and what does it say Julia study and Faith this is wild to me so even sweat Chang the name of it from CES letters to study in faith and that's that's the name of their YouTube channel now as well so if you're looking for the videos that we've done in the past they should be there and there's the videos but now they're rebranded gosh now they're totally rebranded as uh oh my gosh that that means we're making a difference right this is wild to me there it is those are the episodes and you you remember me threatening them right I'm like yes stop demeaning Jeremy rynolds go and if you don't stop I'm gonna just bring up the CES letter in every single Mormon stories episode until you change the name and stop doing it I don't know why it's either Jeremy's threat or us or a combination of the two but they're now running away with their metaphorical tale between oh my gosh and calling it study in faith wait how did the Cs letters directly go to the church's are they both owned because I they're all come on they're all in this together I mean oh my God this is authorized by B yeah yeah like this is like church so were the Cs letters the Cs letters was church owned because I thought I thought that the one Professor um Harper um was was um yeah this is Harper oh this is so wild to me yeah yeah so it says studying faith is an experiential learning project uh authorized by bringham Young University they've got a Dan vogle quote they're quoting Dan vogle Steven Harper is what what does it say Steven Harper is one one of the top historians of the first vision schs of the first Vision oh that's so funny wow anyway we we could declare victory that we're making a big difference oh my gosh along with Jeremy you know so anyway I thought y'all would find that interesting yeah so fascinating okay what's this last slide Julia oh eight oh I was just I was trying to count it might have been 10 I think it's 10 I should probably ret either way it is a solid amount of the issues that Jeremy rynolds brings up in the Cs letter that are confirmed by BYU artist Jeremy sweat so thank you Stephen Harper thank you uh brother sweat for for promoting the CES letter Everybody Needs To Go I'll go to it right now go to CES letter letter. org uh download the CES letter there it is you can buy it Julia's got it buy a copy of it buy it for your Bishop buy it for your State president buy it for your Relief Society president buy it for your dad your mom your siblings your children uh get you'll flood the Earth with the CES letter because it's so true it's so true that BYU faculty are now painting paintings that support the things that Jeremy expressed concerns with back in 2014 and to be to give good credit that Mormon stories the Grant Palmer that Michael Quinn that the Tanners that Mormon uh Mormon think and there's so many truth tellers Fon Brody for so many decades have been trying to get the church to come clean on thank you Anthony SWAT thank you Mormon church for acknowledging the truthfulness of the CES letter cheers all right Nemo any final words before we part no not really other than um I'm glad that brother sweat hasn't been excommunicated for doing this not that I'm salty at all um yeah yeah Julie any final oh and also check out NE the Mormon on YouTube subscribe to it donate do that I'm coming to soon it's gonna be fun times I think St George is sold out is it not John it is and it's not just sold out well I think they may have opened it up okay um they reconfigured the seating to add like seven they used to they used to do Thrive over tables where people would sit around tables so they could get to know each other because St George Thrive sold out um they they're changing the seating to theater style so that at least 70 more people can attend there will be a tour of the mountain medals Massacre with Barbara Jones Brown there'll be Nemo there there'll be other great uh great speakers so we definitely Julie Hanks oh yeah Julie Hanks who else Brett Harley from uh I forget what her Channel's No Nonsense No Nonsense spirituality yeah yeah um that those the two that that I remember but it's going to be good yeah and they asked me to speak every um oh yeah John will be there too but yeah he's not he's not that uh not worth promoting right well John's everything right you turn on HBO they're talking about Mormons John's there you know you get a Thrive John's there like it's not just not a surprise to people is it so there's St George Thrive um it Amy mcf best from uh breaking down patriarchy will be there uh Melissa and Sam ziding weisson they're from the uh growing up polygamy YouTube channel yeah that's one of your most popular episodes right with them yeah some guy named Josh Larsson will be singing and uh and I'm just trying to see if they're get tickets oh look there's 29 tickets 29 tickets available so you if you order now you can be one of the final 29 people to attend to to meet us at Thrive St George to see Nemo and all these other wonderful guests yeah so get your ticket get your tickets today Julia why don't you come to that I don't know all right we'll talk we'll talk after about getting Julia there wooo well Julia thanks for uh thanks for organizing today's episode thanks for helping Julia organize today's episode thanks to herard for the thumbnail and uh his help and also thanks to Anthony sweat and uh Stephen har what is it Harper and uh all those who help promote the CES letter everyone should read it everyone should buy it and thanks to Jeremy for uh for writing it and sacrificing that it might be made possible and thank you to the donors who who make sure that I get my qu and Julia gets her quid yeah Mormon stories donors thanks to everyone who donates to Mormon stories and makes this series possible go to mormonstories.org to become a monthly donor thanks to Mike from LDS discussions. comom for making this series possible we miss you Mike come back and see you soon um yeah and please know that you can check out the full LDS discussions library on Spotify under LDS discussions podcast on on Apple podcasts under LDS discussions and you can go to the Mormon storage podcast YouTube channel find the playlist for LDS discussions and you can watch it start to finish and that's the way and please recommend that series to all your friends and family as well cool all right thanks Julia thanks demo thanks again for joining us today on Mormon stories be good to each other be kind to each other and we'll see you all again soon on another episode of Mormon stories podcast take care everybody