Joseph Smith and Treasure Digging
Original Air Date: 2022-04-13 • Duration: 2h 40m
This video features John Dehlin of the Mormon Stories Podcast introducing a new series in collaboration with "Mike," the creator of the website LDS Discussions. The episode focuses on "Joseph Smith and Treasure Digging" as the foundational topic for understanding Mormon truth claims. The discussion revolves around the historical evidence of Joseph Smith’s involvement in folk magic, the church’s evolving narrative regarding these activities, and how these practices directly shaped the production of the Book of Mormon.
The "Puzzle" Approach to Truth ClaimsMike explains that his goal with LDS Discussions is to present historical issues not as isolated problems but as interconnected pieces of a larger puzzle 1, 2. He argues that apologetics often try to solve issues in isolation (divide and conquer), but when viewed in totality, the apologetic explanations often contradict one another 3. The participants emphasize that to truly understand the history, one must evaluate the evidence objectively, as if looking at another religion or organization, rather than through a faithful bias 4, 5.
Why Start with Treasure Digging?Although the First Vision is chronologically placed in 1820 by the modern church, the podcast argues that treasure digging is the actual historical starting point 6.
The Nature of the PracticeThe group details that "money digging" was a well-known, illegal, and fraudulent practice in the 19th century, comparable to modern Ponzi schemes 12, 13.
The 1826 TrialA focal point of the discussion is the 1826 court trial where Joseph Smith was brought up on charges related to being a "glass looker" and a disorderly person 21.
Connection to the Book of Mormon and Church TheologyThe podcast demonstrates how elements of folk magic were repurposed into Mormon theology:
Apologetic ShiftsThe video highlights the shift in the church's narrative. Historically, the church denied Joseph was a money digger because it damaged his character 31. Now, faced with undeniable evidence (like the 1826 trial record), apologists like Richard Bushman argue that magic was a "preparatory gospel" God used to train Joseph for prophethood 32. Mike counters that this is a "necessity" argument made only because the fraud can no longer be hidden, noting that if Joseph was actively deceiving people during the digs, it casts doubt on the translation process that used the exact same tools and methods 11, 33.
AnalogyTo solidify the methodology of LDS Discussions, Mike uses the analogy of a puzzle. When you are a believer, you are given a box with a picture on it (the church’s narrative) and you force the pieces together to match that picture, even if they don't quite fit. When you deconstruct, you throw away the box and dump the pieces on the table. You then assemble them based only on how they actually fit together. While you lose the original picture you were promised, the pieces finally lock together logically—revealing a picture of 19th-century folk magic evolving into a religion, rather than a divine restoration 1, 34.
Condensed ~5 minute video overview of the full episode, AI-generated by NotebookLM.
Condensed podcast-style audio overview of the full episode, AI-generated by NotebookLM.
AI-generated slideshow powered by NotebookLM (multi-page PDF)
AI-generated infographic powered by NotebookLM (single-page PDF)
Hello everyone and welcome to another edition of Mormon Stories podcast. I'm your host John Delin. It is April 12th, 2022. And now what I want to do is introduce to everyone Mike and Mike is I think Mike is trying to remember is this the first time we we'll have you unmute your mic. Is this the first time we've had you on uh Mormon Stories, Mike, or have you appeared in one way or another? Maybe you've come on as a commenter. I did one one episode like a few months back where I think I was on for like three or four minutes. It was after that whole Brad Wilcox thing and I just hopped on. I was working at home and I saw you post for for um viewers to chime in. So, I logged on, but that that's it so far. Okay. Well, um for for those of you who don't know, Mike is the founder and creator of a really important website called LDS Discussions. Is that right, Mike? Yep, that's right. And it's found where? So, it's just lds discussions.com. It's a generic name. It's one of those things where I wish id probably thought of something more unique, but you know, it it um it really was just one of those things where I think all of us have gone through it where you're trying to piece it together as you go, right? And so, um long story short, you know, for me, it was very similar experience as so many others where you have that moment where you just you need to know. And so, I went out and started looking up stuff and um made those mistakes that everyone else makes, right? like where you um give like the info overload to people around you. And I was asked to read some of the um replies of the CES letter. So the Fair Mormon one and um and then I started taking all these notes and putting them together. And it was like trying to find a way where I could organize it that it made sense to me. Um and then long story short, I was introduced to some people who had been working on similar things. And um one of the the guys who was brilliant, his name's Kellen, um wrote four of the annotated essays which he allowed me to put on the website. And then a few people did blog posts and um so there's there's a lot of stuff. It's it's just um been one of those projects where for me it's like I you know I have a regular job so it's just it's a hobby. I find it fascinating and um that's kind of how it it started and and I think the saints the saints book was where I really started to try to put up a lot of content because I was doing the chapter by chapter review which I think people found helpful just because it was such a a popular book for the church to push and it was nice to be able to go through and kind of point out what I found to be problematic about it and and I learned a lot doing it. So um yeah that was kind of the genesis of it. Yeah. And if I had to just kind of add my two cents, you know, there are several sources or websites. We'll include all these in the show notes. Um, but that are really, really valuable. The first one that came out was was Mormon Think, and that is a that's an early attempt at addressing all of the major issues around the truth claims. And then obviously CES Letter came out that does an amazing job. We've had Jeremy Reynolds on several times. There's another one called letter to my wife or letter for my wife. Letter for my wife which is really really powerful trying to be maybe a little bit more soft um or nuanced or sensitive in how it uh discusses the truth claims and and of course on mormatories.org there's a set of essays these truth claims essays that that Michael Brown wrote. All of those are are all trying to do similar things which is to kind of address the truth claims issues um within Mormonism. And so Mike, you know, LDS discussions is your your attempt, right? And and Mike, if you had to summarize maybe how yours is a little bit different than the others. Uh, you probably already addressed this, but do you have like a real quick a couple sentences description of of what what what made you want to do yours when these other ones existed already? I mean, really. So, Mormon Think is really good, but it hasn't been updated as much as far as I know. It hasn't been updated really in in a lot of years. And then CES letter and letter from my wife, I think, are going to always be like the most effective documents to help people when they're first going through it. And for me it was more um the CES letter has a lot of replies on the website which I didn't know about at first. So for me it was more like trying to make sense of the critical positions and how the apologetic positions fit because when I first read the CES letter I made that mistake of info dumping um which I wish I could do over uh because it it is ineffective and it's not fair to the other person but um they had asked me to read the fair Mormon response and so you read that and you go oh you know they have a lot of of reasonable points against the CES letter and I I spent like like two or three weeks going back and forth and that's when I started finding you know Mormon stories podcast, Mormon Expressions podcast, Mormon Think, and there's so much out there. So for me it was really just how do I make sense of it to me um that maybe goes beyond the CES letter um without trying to go too deep to the point where you know because there's people that you've had on on the show that can run circles around me whether it's you know David Bakvoy Dan Vogel John Hamer Brett Mack all these people who were helpful to me when I was trying to figure it out but it was more you know trying to make it maybe like if the CES letter is dipping your toes in the water maybe this is going kind of diving into the the more shallow end of the pool um in a way that makes sense to both answer the critical position but also constantly going back to what the apologetics are so that people don't think you're only giving one side and I realize people are going to say that anyways but I'm hoping that by doing it this way people can at least acknowledge I'm trying to constantly go back and give what the church's positions are whether it's the annotated essays which are literally based off the essays or the saints book which is going off the saints book in this overview project is every page for the most part has a section of What does the church say about this problem? And what do we then think the evidence says from there? Yeah, we got a comment from Matthew Allen. He writes, "I loved the annotated uh essays on the church's uh essays. I used them um uh when I was reading them. Uh I love the commentary on the first saints book. I have asked for it on the second book." Well, the first Saints book, the first saints book burned me out because I was trying to do a chapter a day and then it got further because of work and stuff, but it burned me out. But um again, I want to shout out Kellen who did the the four best annotated essays. He did the Book of Mormon translation, the DNA and Book of Mormon, uh Polygamy, and Book of Abraham. And the stuff he was able to put in there um for me was the f when I first read his annotated essays, I was encountering stuff I had never come across by looking at CES letter or listening to some of the podcasts. So, um I think it's great because when you see the church's essay and then you can immediately see um not only what the evidence says about the specifics, but also he was making notes about what the footnotes say. And I think that's important because you know in some of these essays it might in a footnote might say for the book of Abraham there's a great one where it says something like you know I sat down and penned as he translated the hieroglyphics or whatever it was by revelation and that's then that same footnote also basically says Joseph Smith was a liar. And so there's those kind of things where um he was able to give a lot of insight. And so so he was um he's he's an amazing um person and resource. So I just want to make sure I give him a shout out because he was really helpful and um allowing me to put those up because I I think they're so great and a lot of people hadn't seen him up until then. So um it was just super really nice that he had done those. Love it. Okay. So yeah, LDS discussions. Not only is it trying to maybe cover more comprehensive set of topics, it's trying to go a little bit deeper than CES letter does. Um, but it also does these amazing reviews of like the gospel topics essays and the book saints and others. And so, so you know, Herardo, uh, as we've been trying to think about really quality content we can provide to Mormon stories, you know, Herardo, you and I have kind of collaborated on Brian Simon Sutherton on. Um, you know, I I brought John Larson on to uh to kind of share um you know, to to kind of revive his amazing work. We've been trying to bring Sandra Tanner on as much as we can. Uh Mike, I would say part of the reason we're bringing you on is with the idea of doing a series with you where where over a period of let's just say a year or two, we can do a comprehensive coverage of many of the most important issues that that people face. And so maybe that's maybe that's a good intro to presentation is that Harado, do you want to add anything really quick about Lias discussions before we jump in? Um um I I've been chatting with Mike for a couple years now. Um while I was at BYU Idaho going through my deconstruction um you know when I had just recently found Mormon stories um I start you know I found Mormon think and then LDS discussions was huge on my dis deconstruction uh face. Um it was just a great resource. the annotated essays are amazing. The Saints book um commentary and you know all all of his content is is amazing. So I mean I've been waiting for this moment for a while to finally have Mike on Mormon Stories. So yeah, really happy for this. All right, so with that I think what we're going to do is we're going to um launch. So this today we're going to be covering um an overview of Joseph Smith and treasure digging. Uh it's going to be the first topic hopefully of many. And so we're going to be bouncing between these slides and uh kind of a panel discussion. And so uh so Mike, where do you And I guess it's worth mentioning that Mike isn't isn't your real name. Yes. Is that okay to say? Yeah, it's fine. Like I said, it's just it's it's easier to to do it this way. Um I had left one um pretty generic comment on it was actually when I was doing the Saints book and so I was doing the the chapter by chapter book and um I kept getting these uh paid Facebook ads for their face toface event in Nauvoo and um I had left an event. I just left a comment. I think it said something like I hope the event's more honest on the book and I shouldn't have done it. It was stupid but I kept seeing the ad. And this was back when I was really more uh in that angry phase and I shouldn't have done it. Um but a family member saw it and called everybody. And so this is just I had this second account that I was using beforehand for basically enter contest and I just used it and I said, you know what, screw it. I'll do that. It's just easier um because they know where I'm at. Um but I don't want to put it in their face. So it's just easier for me to do it this way. And um hopefully people can understand that. uh you know, like I said, they know where it's not like I'm hiding my positions from them because they know how I feel. Um but at the same time, I don't need to post links to these pages I've done and have to, you know, put that in their face either because, you know, they don't put things in my face. So, you know, it's just more of a easier way to live, I guess. Yeah. And and so, Mike, do you want to tell people your Facebook handle or do you not want to tell people that? Uh I don't even know what it is, but if you go you could go to um I think facebook.comldds discussion is on there. the name the okay. Oh, it's it's just it's I have to look it up. I don't even know because I like I said I just it was a thing I used for contest. I don't even know exactly how you spell the last name and it's it's fine. Okay. All right. Well, let's go ahead and jump into um let's go ahead and jump into the presentation if you want and we'll jump back and forth. Okay. So, you know, this part I just wanted to cover really quickly because if we're going to do this in the future, if if people listening want to hear more topics, um I had been doing the eldest LDS discussion stuff for a while and to be honest, I hadn't put much up and um I had basically a family member come to me and say, "Do you really believe you can prove the truth claims are not true?" And I said, "I I do believe that." So, they asked me to put together basically something that encompassed all of it that would prove the truth claims are not true. And and for the purpose of these episodes, however many we do, when I say not true, you can't prove the idea of Mormonism not true because that's not really a testable claim. I'm talking about the testable truth claims a church makes, I believe you can prove are not true through this research. Um, so I just want to make that clear because I know sometimes there's an argument like you can't prove the church is true or not true. I'm speaking more to truth claims because to me it's like saying you can't prove a house is is is is good because the outside you could see the siding and all that but I'm saying when you look at the truth claims which to me are the building blocks. That's all I mean. So um that's what started the project. That's what kind of got it going. Um and I first envisioned like eight to 10 topics kind of like you would see with a CS letter. And the crazy thing was every time I got going it was like I would come across something else and go I got to add that. And um you know it just kept adding and adding and adding and eventually got to it's 39 pages. Um there are some more I wanted to do but I just got burned out on it. And really the intent of the whole thing because I was asked by a family member was to put it together in a way that that made sense from from start to finish. So they're not really meant to be um you know a bunch of separate pages and really to avoid anything that I felt like I couldn't personally defend as using as a source. And and so we know sometimes that critics will use sources and apologists will say this is crap because we can tell it's a third-hand account from 80 years, whatever the case might be. And on the flip side with with the church with the church's own materials, they might use sources that I would say they're so speculative or distant that you can't use them. And so I tried really hard not to use overly speculative accounts. Try to avoid the salacious ones unless you could perfectly or at least very solidly back them up. And by doing that, I'm hoping that even if you read it and you you are a believer, you might say, "I don't agree with you." But at least you're not, you know, willfully dishonest because I really feel like I tried hard not only to avoid those issues, but to also give the apologetic on every page to give the church's position so that somebody can understand that I'm covering what I think the evidence says, what the church's response would be, and then what I think we can make from that. So, we go to the next slide on that. Yeah. And I just want to say I really love that idea that that you're working hard to be credible, to be fair, um, and to be sensitive to truth and not to create your own straw man, right? Like Yeah. And and to be fair, I'm sure there are going to be areas in in this 39 pages where you're going to say like, "You shouldn't have said it that way or you're framing it wrong." And I get that because I was doing them. I'm not I don't have a proofread or anything, but I really tried. So, like, you know, a good example would be um people will often say Joseph Smith um practiced abortions in Nauvoo. And to me, I look at that and I'm like, there is not enough evidence for me to even go down that road. So, I I'm not even touching it. And it's not that I'm saying 100% it didn't happen or it did happen. I'm just saying for me that's just too speculative. And and you could give countless examples. That's just one where people will constantly say like, why don't you cover the abortions? I'm like because there's not enough to go with. And the one thing I learned early on is early on I was just accepting everything I found um as like okay once I got to that point when you read the CS letter and then you take that step back and you're like you know what if I'm going to accuse or if I'm going to point out when the church is using a source that's really not good then I don't want to do it myself. And so that was really um where that came down was just trying to make sure that like I said if you read it as a believer you might not agree. It might still make you uncomfortable but at least you know you won't say you're intentionally using bad sources. I really tried to avoid that where I could you know everywhere. Yeah. Well that's good. And that that way we're not being dishonest. That way people can trust what we're saying and then they can kind of make their own decisions. And that's what Mormon Stories is about. It's literally about informed consent. And so you're just trying to provide people with a narrative that's more honest, more honest than the than the Gospel Topics essays that that uh allows people to make informed decisions. All right. So what's next on your uh Yeah. So that's the website. If anybody wants to check it out if you haven't, you can just go to lds discussions.com. It's not the best designed website. At some point I need to go in and do a better job of that, but it's just, you know, it's just there. Um it's the overview project is at the top because that really is the basically the only thing I've done in the last year with the website is just getting that up there and doing the different topics. Okay. And you know when I was doing the project the best way I thought of this and it might sound cheesy but it's like I was a convert to the church. I joined in college. I took the discussions in high school. I went through high school and I feel like when you're given the presentation on the church you're given like a box like so a picture you get buy a puzzle at the store. They've got the picture on the front of what it looks like and you open it up, you're putting it together and you're having someone tell you what the history is. popping it together and um whenever I came across things where it made me uncomfortable like polygamy always bothered me um as dumb as it sounds my I dated I started dating my wife in high school and when you go out with like groups of friends separate and like say my my my now wife went with a group that had a bunch of guys and you know I saw you know they were off chat and I would you get jealous and on the flip side same thing and um so polygamy bothered me because I'm always thought like how could a loving god do that but at the same time you just kind of push it off decide, you know, because you don't want to let that lead you down that path. So, you you you mash those pieces together of the puzzle because you're like, you know what, I don't think this fits right. They're telling me this is where it goes. You push it down and it doesn't quite fit right, but you just keep going with it. And um and so for that, you keep telling yourself, look, the puzzle makes sense once you look at it. Just put the pieces together. Don't worry about it. Then go to the next slide. Um, and so for me, when I had that moment where I had to know, it's like you go up back to the table and you just take the puzzle alt apart. You put all the pieces, you scatter them on the table, and you throw the box away. So now you still have all the pieces, but you don't have the picture that it's supposed to look like when you're done doing it. And so now you're not worried about jamming the pieces together. You're only worried about making sure they fit the way they're supposed to. And go to the next one. Um, and so this is really for me when I started to study it and and I'm I'm talking about months after I started because of course those f first few months are always kind of rocky when you're doing it. And I would say this really took about a year to feel comfortable with. You start finding all the pieces can fit together. If you just go with what what the evidence tells you instead of saying this is what I was taught as a convert or this what I was taught in Sunday, you say here are the sources telling us what happened with these topics. they start popping together really nicely and all of a sudden you're putting the pieces together and it's like weird because on one hand when you're deconstructing this stuff you're really upset and you're frustrated because you know you're upset that you you felt like you weren't told the truth. On the other hand there's something oddly satisfying about finding this finding all these evidence and sources that fit together and kind of solve the puzzle. So, um, for me, that was kind of how this overview project worked, too, because you're starting with one piece of the puzzle, and then as we go, you just keep adding on. And that's why in the overview project, which needs a better name at some point, you're popping the the next piece is going to fit, and you're going to be able to call back to the previous one and say, and this is why this comes from this, or this is why these have similar problems. So, um, that was pretty much um the the the genesis of that. And, um, I don't know if anyone has any any comments on that before we move on. No, I I think it's great and I just want to make sure listeners and viewers know that this is uh we want this to be a birectional conversation. So if there are historians out there or amateur historians that want to tell us we got something wrong. Uh Mike, I'm sure that you would invite uh those sort of that feedback, you'll you'll probably edit your essays or your website pages accordingly. and we're willing to, you know, come in future episodes and and kind of make it clear. But what we hope is accomplish at the end of this is, you know, how how many total episodes do you think we could possibly do together, Mike? It mean it depends on how much people want to want to go over because there's there's 39 topic pages. Some of the topics are split because it's just one it's too long and two because they kind of like polygamy is three topics because there's one account it talks about how the genesis of it. Then there's one that talks I think about the proposals and kind of how Joseph Smith implemented himself. And then the third I think is um going over the apologetics and I think some other stuff and the happiness letters in there. Um but it's really one topic. So I mean it depends on it depends how much basically I would invite viewers to let you know how much they want to see because you could do it in probably you know 15 to 20 or you could do it in you know 25 to 40 depending on how in-depth you want to go. But, um, like I said, for me, I think there's a bunch of topics you can mash together and and and kind of keep it a little more concise. Um, because they they they do work together and you don't have to obviously cover the entire overview on every episode. So, we could we could probably condense it down quite a bit. Yeah. And just to Yeah. So, what I would like to see is just this steady stream of Mormon Stories content that deals with truth claims. And if it ends up being 40 or even 50 episodes that spans a few years, that will be a self-contained library of a comprehensive discussion of many or most of the major issues that deal with church truth claims. So that's the series that we envision if if you all like it. So please give us your feedback. Y we'll consider um keeping this going. Is that all right? That sounds Yeah, it sounds good. Like I said, you know, when you uh for people watching, it's like um if you feel like this is helpful, let us know because I'm doing, you know, I was I was laughing one day because one day I was listening to someone talk about um Anthony Miller, I think, and who he's been on here and he actually was very helpful to me about um biblical scholarship stuff and um he always calls he says Joseph Smith was an eclectic aggregator, I think is the phrase he always uses and it's because he was really good at pulling sources and then kind of aggregating them into the way he wanted it. And really that's all I did here was for the most part you're just going through and looking at what other people have done, trying to find what makes sense, looking at documents. Um so it's not like I'm presenting anything that's going to rattle, you know, the earth here, but I feel like it's put together in a way that's a little more unique and I feel like it's more solid um with regards to, like I said, just being really careful and trying not to overstep on some of the stuff. So if people like it, we'll keep going. If they don't, totally understand that, too. Um I love it. I think that the term that uh Terrell Given likes to use is that Joseph Smith was an inspired synratist. Oh yeah, I know. I know he did uh he's doing bricklage now, I think. Right, isn't he the bricklage? Yeah. And and and the thing is we we'll get to that more as we go. But you know um is definitely um a shift in um from what they you know I I I took the missionary discussions 20 24 25 years ago and like the way that they talk it would be completely foreign to me and if they had given me those talks you know 24 years ago I would have had a much different impression because you know we'll get into it more but yeah those those changes and you'll never hear those positions given on on a general conference talk either at least not now. Yeah. Yeah. All right. So, let's uh you've got another at least another slide of this view. Yeah, it's just last one. And so, when I was writing this um like I said, I was writing it for someone who asked me to put it together. And um the the two thoughts I had here when I was doing it, I tried to to mention this if you guys read it. Um the different overview topics are going to constantly go back to this, which is one when you read these issues, you got to take them in totality. You cannot divide and conquer them. And um I say that because when you read the replies like um you know this the Fair Mormon the Jim Bennett uh replies to the CES letter, what you'll see a lot of times is you'll take two issues that are problematic to the church's truth claims and they'll get two separate apologetic responses. But if you take that apologetic response and apply it to the other, it can't work. So you can't reconcile um the two because you're you're not looking at them in totality. So a good example of that would be in the Book of Mormon. We are told at times that it was loosely translated and that's why there's anacronisms. That's why Joseph Smith wrote his own life experience into there. That's why there's King James Bible errors. At the same time, then we're told, oh, but it's a tight translation. That's how we got kaasmus. That's how we got Hebraisms. That's how we got um some of the words that are unique like Desireette, right? And so for me, you cannot take those two things unless you want to then expand the translation kind of reality field and say, well, he could whenever Joseph Smith wanted to, God was okay with him just jumping from reading off a stone to just riffing on his own. And I'm overgeneralizing here. We'll get into that later if people want to hear more um of these topics. But to take the issues in totality is the way you have to do it because and I'll keep calling back to them as we go. But a lot of these issues are really connected. um there's patterns in some of these problems and when you see those patterns it becomes easier to understand um where they come from as opposed to constantly taking one issue coming up with some apologetic and saying okay we're good with that let's go to the next um for me it's about going you know overall you can't just take one out and then pop it back in and then take another one out so that that was the first point if I can if I can just kind of echo that like some examples of that would be how how the you know when we're talking about polygamy the Book of Mormon says, you know, if I'm going to raise a seed, I think this is in Jacob, then I will. Otherwise, polygamy is bad. And it's basically saying the purpose of polygamy is to raise righteous seed, which means bearing children. But then when they try and talk about Joseph Smith's polygamy, Brian Hails and others are always trying to say there were no offspring. Well, you can't have it both ways, right? The Book of Mormon is about raising a righteous seed or having children. But then Joseph Smith never had any children or never had sex with any of his polygamous spouses. Another example would be just understanding that um that that you know the first the first vision changes to the first vision story in and of themselves, you might be able to say that each of the different versions of the first vision fits some sort of combined narrative. But when you combine that with the fact that the Book of Mormon itself has a trinitarian view of the Godhead and then as Joseph Smith's theology evolves, then his recounting of the first vision story um changes along with the Book of Mormon text itself changing to reflect Joseph Smith's on um evolving views on the Godhead. Once you kind of put all those pieces together, you see uh you see things that you can't see when you're dealing with the topics uh in, you know, separately. Is that kind of what you're saying? Yeah. I mean, it is. And and and the thing is when you go through these topics, I'll try to point to them. I think with treasure digging, you won't see as much of that because it's kind of a a little bit away from, you know, the main Mormon topics you see. But um yeah, that's the whole thing is trying to say to them if you're going to use that apologetic here, then how do you then take that same apologetic and apply it to here because if you take it to both topics, it's irreconcilable because they they can't work in tight versus loose. Um whether skin means skin in the Book of Mormon or, you know, um we could go about polygamy, you know, um how words are used in polygamy and and then they're they're said, "Oh, no, it didn't mean that, but it means that because, you know, again, I'm going off top. I think we'll we'll get into this, but I think there are apologetics for the peepstone and the hat and the treasure digging, right? That that are problematic once you realize that Joseph Smith carried the peep stone and the hat uh into his translation of the Book of Mormon. Yeah, absolutely. Jen wants to jump in here. Hey, Jen. Hey. I was just going to say um as I was starting my faith crisis, um that's kind of I believe how all of them start. like you find one thing and at least for me I found one thing and I would be like okay I'll put it on the shelf or whatever you know that phrase put it on the shelf and then you you read another thing and you're like okay I can I can just leave that here you know it'll all be worked out in heaven you know that saying too and then you find another thing and then another thing and then another thing and as you're then you're starting to like bundle them in like little groups and then you just can't you can't look past them anymore cuz they're just so big. And I think that that's kind of what your your website does. Um kind of helps you have the bundle already there. So yeah. Yeah. Well said, Jen. Thank you. Yeah. Yeah. That's great. Okay. And then um the second part of that slide is basically and this is the really hard part and it's hard for it was hard for me to do um and I had really stopped believing in the church before I started the deep dive into research because of you know like I said polygamy bothered me and then going through the temple was for me just horrific. It still took me years to to get to this point. Um, but you have to when you read these things, when you listen to these, you have to be willing to take that step back and look at these issues the same way you would look at it as if you were talking to somebody who was explaining another religion, another politician, organization to you and then say, if someone else told me this thing with someone else besides, you know, Mormonism in it, would I immediately tell them, "Oh my goodness, this is absolutely not true." Or would you say, "Yeah, you know what? I I believe that could happen because and we could all give stories of this. I mean I had um really quick story is I was talking with some believing members and this had I don't want to get into politics but it was an issue in 2020 when Elizabeth Warren um was running for president and she in her her book had written that when she got pregnant she got fired um because she was pregnant they fired her because at the time the law allowed it and they had found an interview with her that was before the book was written and in the interview she had said that after she had gotten pregnant she quit so that she could spend more time with her kids. So, in the earlier interview, she did not say she was fired. She said she voluntarily quit so she could spend time with her kids. And again, that part's not important because I don't want to get into politics, but I was talking with some believing members and they were like, "Oh, she absolutely lied." And so, I immediately thought of the first vision and I said, "Yeah, if you have a story and then there's an earlier version that totally undercuts the grand importance of the second one, then then that's not true." And they said, "Oh, yeah, absolutely." And I had posted it on Twitter and I had gotten a lot of comments that would also be reflective of how we we function, our brains function. And a lot of the replies were um she may not have told the story quite right, but the feelings behind it are good. Or I know she wasn't lying in the first one. I think that you're just trying to make too much of it. All that stuff. And so then I said, so if you were to recreate the story um and add that element in, which is then going to launch your political career to give you more credibility, you would say that that's not true. And one of them turned around and he kind of laughed and he goes, "You used to be able to get away with that, but with Google now, you can't get away with that anymore." Now, if I had said, "That's the exact same thing that Joseph Smith did with the first vision or the priesthood restoration," I would have been out on the street. Um, and we all work that way. I'm not just picking on members of the Mormon church, but you have to be able to look at this evidence as if it's kind of like foreign to you. It's not if it's not the Mormon church. And then if you can't say this makes sense or I think this this is still true, then you have to make that question of what does that mean and what do I do with it? But at least at first you have to be willing to evaluate it as if it's if it's not your predetermined beliefs. You have to, you know, let go of the rod, so to speak, and then assess it. And then if it's true, you could go right back to where you were. And if it's not true, you deserve to know that, too. I love it. So, kind of look at look at things objectively like you would other religious traditions or even politics or other organizations. I love it. Yeah. And that's what we're trying to do here is to be as even though it's obvious we all have our own positions, we're going to do our best to be as objective as possible as we as we analyze this and just look at the I just want to comment really quick about this point that Mike is making because I think it's really important and you'll find apologists usually use um this kind of logic um fault logic uh on their apologetic argument. ments. Um, yesterday I was reading um just this um reply to a comment from the Joseph Smith Foundation and they say, "Well, Joseph Smith said this about how he translated the Book of Mormon with the Yeram. So if we believe that Joseph is a prophet of God because we already have a testimony of that, then we must take him at his word and we need to to like recognize that he can't be lying. Uh and that's how kind of like they defend defend their point. And I think what Mike is saying, it's really really important that we evaluate uh our own beliefs um like from an outsider perspective if we if what we're really trying to find is the truth. Right. Yeah. If we care about the truth. Yeah. Right. I love it. Um All right. Well, uh I love it. And so, um and and I do want to apologize to everyone. We're we're already 41 minutes in. Normally, we're going to have very brief introductions and dive right in. We're going to try and keep these to one to two hours. Yeah. But but for just so you all all know, today we wanted to set up we wanted to introduce Mike to you, tell you about LDS discussions, talk about a little bit of his story and what led to this project and then kind of lay out the idea for the project. We also just want to thank uh we are live streaming this. We want to thank Em Marie for her super chat. we we do we would welcome donations uh to support uh this project. So we want to thank you for that and and invite you guys all if if you really value this sort of content, you know, uh we appreciate your your support uh through super chats or however you want to support u Mormon stories. All right, Mike. Well, should we jump into the next uh the next slide, which is why we're starting with treasure digging. Should we do that? Yeah. And this is just something quick because I think sometimes I've gotten a few emails over the last year and they'll say why do you start with treasure digging and not the first vision. And I just want to point out um historically speaking the first vision we're told happened in 1820. But from a historical background it if it happened what Joseph Smith details is 1824 and he never tells anyone about it until 1832 when he writes it down. Even then no one really knows about it. So for me, treasure digging is where this starts. And the reason it starts there is because treasure digging directly impacts the gold plate story, the translation of the Book of Mormon. It's in the text of the Book of Mormon itself. And so for me, when I talked earlier about the puzzle, this is the first puzzle piece that everything else is going to start from because without treasure digging, you cannot get to the other stuff. Um it also helps us to understand where Joseph Smith's worldview was before um the Book of Mormon, you know, dictation begins. And um it also impacts aspects of the church today that we don't think about um when you're when you're there because it seems so you know normal to us. But but this has implications all the way to today. So that's why I want to start with this topic as opposed to jumping into the first vision. Yeah. And and for me, I think that's that's where I always like to start too because, you know, the fact that he didn't tell, you know, the treasure digging is happening in the 1820s and he didn't first really mention the first vision to anyone until 1832. It does beg the question as to whether or not the first vision really happened versus it's a story he made up later. And then and then it makes a lot more sense. It's it's where the evidence is. That's where the history is. And it's it's much easier to draw a line from treasure digging um to Book of Mormon to then the foundation of the church and then to a first vision story to kind of retroactively justify the question of authority and divinity. It it it really does start for all those reasons. It really really does start with treasure digging. Yeah. You can't get any you you can't get to like that's the whole thing. cannot get from there to the Book of Mormon wi without it. And so it again it it might seem somewhat boring in the sense of we're not going to be talking about the Book of Mormon today even though you you know we may do some you know a little bit of foreshadowing like yeah you know but for the most part this is something that happened before the plates were they might have been conceived during this time but obviously he wouldn't claim to have them until after this. Um, but you still have to do it because if you don't cover this, um, you can't really understand the translation, uh, uh, at all really. I think I think it's really, and we'll cover all that, so I don't need to go into it now, but yeah, it's big. Now, we even have a list uh, a list of all the treasure digs that Joseph Smith was involved with. And and we have treasure digging, according to Mark Elwood, uh, going all the way back to 1820. So, you could argue that Joseph Smith's treasure digging predates his first vision account even if you believe that a first vision happened. Yeah. You know, it's all right there. It's just like, you know, we talking about earlier, it's like for me, I'm looking at what does the evidence tell you? And for me, there are people who can make the claim that something happened. He exper I think John Hamer will say he experienced something even if it wasn't what he you know wrote down or you know expressed in the 1838 account but even if you have that it's not going to be the the correlated version of the first vision. So whatever we want to talk about with the first vision it's not going to be as the church narrative is. So for me, I don't think it's the first thing you want to cover because we'll get to it if we get, you know, if if people want to hear more. In the first vision overview, I kind of lay out why the first vision is in a lot of ways kind of retrofitting back um into the history and I can show why. Um and so for me, treasure digging, we have a lot of accounts like Mark's list of digs, those have specific dates that we can actually point to. We know those happened. And so I think that's why you have to start there. Yeah. Were you going to say something, Herardo? Um, well, this idea that Mike mentioned that um, Joseph Smith might not have experienced the first vision like um, you know, he told it later in 1838. Um, this idea I've heard it from Dan Vogle as well. And and Dan Vogle also, I mean, I respect Dan Vogle so much, you know, he he knows the documents like like the palm of his hand. And so, but I just wanted to mention he also believes like if something happened, it it it would have happened around 18 uh 24 and 1825. Um in terms of a first vision. In terms of a first vision, correct? Yeah. And yeah, he he also recognizes that treasure digging started 18 1819 1820. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And and I'll just say again, this is kind of spoiler alert, but this really does frame things that the entire Book of Mormon story, you cannot understand the Book of Mormon emergence without understanding treasure digging. Because what we're going to just we're going to talk about is this idea of buried treasure with a spirit guarding it. And that's treasure digging. Yeah. It's it's buried treasure with a spirit guarding it. and the fact that the stone in the hat starts with the treasure digging goes into the Mormon creation. And treasure digging is where Joseph Smith gets his reputation as someone with special powers. And that's what allows him to claim that he found golden plates with an angel. That would have been viewed as crazy or noncredible except for the fact that he had already established a reputation as someone with special powers from his treasure digging. So we're This is just a preview. Yeah. And we're gonna now we're gonna kind of dig into it now. So So let's define Mike. Let's define what treasure digging is. Should we do that? Yeah. And so we're just going to go quick because this is more um if you're watching, you've probably heard of it, but so this is from BYU studies. And so this is being written, of course, in a way that would be softer towards Joseph Smith, but just says, "In frontier America, sear stones or peep stones were commonly used by lost object finders, people engaged in the widespread practice of lost treasure digging, and sometimes by people seeking to uncover the kind of truths we might call a private or police detective for today. It is unclear how much of this kind of activity Joseph Smith was involved in, except for water divining and treasure digging, which are widely attested. So this is basically all I'm doing here is I just want to make clear when we say Joseph Smith did treasure digging this is there are people who dispute it but it's at this point there's no reputable scholar I know of in the church or out of the church that would deny it happened. We have way too much evidence to say that. And so even though this is a very soft account of what treasure digging was, I just wanted to put in there because even at BYU they're saying, "Oh yeah, absolutely. He was engaged in this kind of treasure digging." Yeah. Maxwell Institute agrees. Uh, the Joseph Smith Papers Project agrees and the Mormon Church's own gospel topics essays, they all agree. So, so believers who are watching and listening, there's nothing we're going to be saying here that the church fundamentally disagrees with, right? Yeah. Yeah, that's a that's a great point. Okay, let's go to the next slide. So, the next one, this is a little bit different take on it. This is Benjamin Franklin, who we all know. And I just want to point out this is the thing about treasure digging is that it was common enough that people were aware of it. So when the church says it was a common practice, it they're not lying. It was common enough that people looked at it. It's just this is what Benjamin Franklin thought. And I think this is a fair way to think of what educated people thought. So this is by the way, this quote, as I understand it, comes from the early 1700s. This isn't even it's not even a late 1700s quote. This is what Benjamin Franklin is writing in whatever periodical he wrote for. Yeah. Let's just say the 1720s or 1730s is is kind of where I I um I date this quote. Yeah. So, this is a a good quote. So, and don't rush reading of it because there's listeners That's true. want will want you to take your time to read it. Okay. Okay. There are among us great number of honest art artifificers and laboring people who fed with a vain hope of growing suddenly rich neglect their business almost to the ruining of themselves and families involuntarily endure abs abundance of fatigue and a fruitless search after imaginary hidden treasure at length a mighty hole is dug and perhaps several cartloads of earth thrown out but alas no keg or iron pot is found no seaman's chest crammed with Spanish pistols or weighty pieces of eight then they conclude through that through some mistake in the procedure some rash word spoke or some rule of art neglected, the guardian spirit had power to sink it deeper into the earth and convey it out of their reach. And just to be clear, this when you when you look at that quote, all every element of that is in Joseph Smith's history. So even when Benjamin Franklin says that they do this to the ruining of themselves and families, and I don't really touch on it much in the overview, but what on one of their treasure digs, they lose the farm while they're out treasure digging. And so what he's saying before Joseph Smith's time is literally every element of that is in this treasure digging. And that's why I think when we see apologists will frame this as well it was part of the world the millu of the time and it was common. It's like it was but a lot of things today are common that really can hurt people's lives. So to say it's common does not at all mean it was good or that it was helpful to anyone even to themselves. And I think that's important to note. Yeah. we can think about today. What are some of the most common scams? Let's just say a Ponzi scheme or a pyramid scheme or um uh other types of fraud. Let's just say um you know counterfeiting or there's there's a ton of cryptocurrency scheme schemes. Netflix is launching tons of new shows, you know, about about uh Silicon Valley schemes and just like lot con women and con man who are, you know, yeah, the thing is like, you know, we we we could touch on this real quick now, but you always hear presentism, right? So they'll say you can't talk about the things that happened in the early church because we didn't live through it. So it's presentism for us to project our feelings onto it. But the difference is when you could show that Benjamin Franklin and was giving an explanation of what this was, that's not presentism. He actually was before Joseph Smith. So you can evaluate what they were doing based on what other people at the time were doing. And and to your point, this is nothing new. And it's still here today. I mean, I can tell you um part of what I do for work, I am in different groups. And then some of those groups, I've seen people get killed because they're trying to um I'm I try to explain without doing too much, but they'll sign up for these classes. People will give classes on how you can get rich quick by doing certain things um online and they'll sign up for it. And I'm always thinking like, why are you doing this? It's so expensive. And then they do it and then they put the money in towards these projects of what you're supposed to do, whether it's, you know, day trading cryptocurrency or um some of it's, you know, selling making products online. and they ruin themselves because they they lose money they don't have. And so this is nothing new and it's nothing old. It's just we have to put it in proper context to understand that with treasure digging it it is nothing different than a scam you would see today. And so to to claim presentism I think would then say well then you c you can't comment on what people might do today. Um like you said whether it's a Ponzi scheme or an MLM or something where uh well-intentioned people are taking advantage of people who don't know better. whether they mean to hurt them or whether they think they can help them, it doesn't matter. Those things still exist today. And and so that's all I wanted to point out there. Yep. It was a known scam, a hund well-known scam. Treasure digging was a was a disreputable, illegal, well-known uh scam a hundred years before Joseph Smith Yeah. started practicing it. Yeah. Oh, and so probably just like today Ponzi schemes and pyramid schemes would be illegal at that time. T uh pretending to find lost objects, you know, like keeping and and treasure seeking was was illegal as well. Yeah, that's the thing. Like so people will say like you there's the church put out some videos uh they're kind of animated. They're called like the Now You Know series, and I I haven't watched in a while, but I watched it. And it says, basically, it's trying to say this was really common in his day, so we really shouldn't worry about it. And my thought is, yeah, it was common, but it was so common and so well known to be a scam that it was against the law. So, they don't point that out. And it's a really important context, you know, uh, in my opinion. If you tell someone it's common, it was common in their time, it implies that it was reputable. It was anything but. And I think that's why the Benjamin Franklin um quote is so important because it really illustrates pretty much every aspect of it that we're going to be talking about today. Yeah. The fact that it was illegal means that it was well known and common enough. Yeah. For legislatures and governors to take the time to make laws. And it was harmful enough, right? was harmful enough, pervasive enough, and well known enough to make legislators and and executive officers make laws to prohibit it. Yep. Exactly. All right, let's go ahead and go to the next slide. So, the next one is just kind of starting to really kind of go through this real quick, but Joseph Smith, we know, participated in treasure digging. He used what was um known by some as a peep stone. He would call it a sear stone. Um but I want to point out Oliver Cowry also believed in kind of this magical worldview. He had a dousing rod um or divining rod where um these were different objects that were used. And the one thing um this was in the annotated essay on our website that uh Keller put together, but you know, we look at the magic mirror in Snow White or the Paleanteer and Lord of the Rings and you think, well, those are those are goofy, you know, uh fantasy type things, but that's the same process that Joseph Smith would have claimed to have with the Sears stone. And um the one thing that was kind of funny with the Palanteer and the Lord of the Rings is what is that? explain what that is. It's the It's the looks like a crystal ball. And in the Lord of the Rings, um oh my gosh, I think it's Pippen, one of them. He he wakes up and he open he holds it and you could see like the eye of Sauron in it and the eyes looking at you and you could see into the the ball. It's like a crystal ball, right? Yeah, it's a crystal ball. And so, but in the book, it talks about how people that look at that, the more power you hold, the better you get a vision into the ball. And that's the same thing with treasure digging. This belief was the stronger your ability to be a seer, the more you could see with it. whether it's treasure, whether it's, you know, seeing further away. And so the Lord of the Rings, which obviously was written long after, but um or, you know, I think it's in the similar similar saying that wrong, but um written after, but it's the same prospect of these are fantasy science fiction magical ideas that were talked about in literature and yet Joseph Smith was was basically adopting these ideas and and and not just him, but people in his millu as well. Yeah. So it's on the level of crystal balls, magic mirrors, Ouija boards, Jupiter talismans. Exactly. And and it was viewed as as superstitious then. Right. Right. Yeah. And that's that's all I was pointing out. It's just it, you know, when you look at Snow White, you'd say, "Oh, that's that's so funny that there's a magic mirror that can look back at you." Or if you watch Lord of the Rings, you're like, "Holy cow, that's that'd be amazing if there was a ball that you could see a vision of across Middle Earth or whatever." But that's what treasure digging is. And it's really hard to like if you're a believer in Joseph Smith to like try to visualize just how what you need to do to get to that point where you can believe he had these powers, but you have to then kind of accept that those are real things. And it's that that's just kind of the way of pointing out how much of a stretch it is to get there. And I think for the show notes, Jen will add uh Michael Quinn's book, Early Mormonism and the Magic Worldview, which is a really important book. It's a groundbreaking book that Michael Quinn, uh, may he rest in peace, came out with in the 80s that really really digs into this magic worldview that that largely uneducated, you know, rural citizens have, but not only, but but largely. Yeah, not only. I mean, everyone can fall into it. It's just that's tends to be where it was. So, yeah, absolutely. Okay. Uh, so now we've got a video that we want to set up. And uh this is from Hannah Stoddard. Is that right, Herardo? Yes. Of of the Joseph Smith Foundation. And it's it's a bit of a lengthy video, but I think it's brilliant because this this you know, for a long long time, the Mormon church just denied that Joseph Smith was a treasure digger. They denied that he got arrested. If you look at, you know, Hu Nibbli's, are we going to have the Hu Nibbi quote later, Mike? Where Hu Nibbi? Okay. Yeah, we'll get into it. But the church denied it for so long. And there's a reason that the Mormon church for over a hundred years denied that Joseph Smith was a treasure digger and that he was involved in folk magic and and and and why it's problematic. And Hannah Stoddard is going to lay out the problem. But who did you want to say something? Microardo John. Uh yeah, I wanted to just read a quote. Uh it's not going to be on the clip that we are going to play right now, but it's a quote from the actual full video and it's a quote by Richard Bushman. Um and so I just want to say like it's not just you claiming that the church denied this or that apologists denied it. Um it's not just us like you know anti- Mormon crazies. Um but Richard Bushman who sells his book at Desert Book this a quote by him rolling right yeah correct and he says uh the response of Mormon historians in the 1970s was to deny almost everything. They argued all the money digging stories were fabrications of Joseph Smith's enemies. They claimed that the sources for the stories were corrupted and therefore not to be trusted. Um, so, so that's that's a former patriarch, the the church's number one expert on Joseph Smith, faithful stake president, uh, church historian, Richard Bushman, acknowledging that for over 150 years, the Mormon church hid or lied or deceived or denied or downplayed the treasure digging and basically kept Joseph's peep stones in their vault, denied that they existed, and hid them from the membership. All true. Yes, it definitely was hid from me. Yeah. Yeah, it was hid from Jen. Wasn't Well, they were I was told that it wasn't true like blatantly. Yeah. Yeah. And what Hannah Stoddard is about to tell us is she's going to explain to us why Joseph Fielding Smith, Hugh Nibbi, and others were so terrified uh to acknowledge Joseph Smith treasuring. Is that all right? Yeah. Should we Should we roll it? That's good. I think we should do it. All right. This is Hannah Stoddard of the Joseph Smith um found foundation uh project because John realizes that this issue alone is driving members out of the church. It's leading to the greatest apostasy since Kirtland. And this is something that actually scholars within the church have acknowledged. Daniel Peterson who works at BYU um he acknowledged that the character of Joseph Smith matters. It matters if he was a treasure digger. It matters if he was in the occult. Daniel Peterson said the character and claims of Joseph Smith are fundamental to the claims of the church he founded. Knowing this, critics of the prophet have contended for more than a century and a half that he and his family were the kind of people from whom nobody would want to buy a used car, much less receive a plan of salvation. In other words, what Daniel Peterson is saying is if Joseph Smith was a man of character, that matters. That lends credibility to the gospel that he gave. if he was not a man of character that calls the entire restoration of the gospel into question. It calls the Book of Mormon and everything else into question. Um because think about it, would you buy a used car from a bumbling idiot who is dishonest and running around with money diggers and treasure hunters and dabbling in occultic practices? Why would you trust him to buy a used car? And if you wouldn't trust him to buy a used car, why are you going to trust him with your plan to a plan of salvation, your plan to get back to God? It just doesn't make sense. And a lot of people, sometimes people will say, "Well, I heard Roughstone Rolling is this great book. If someone's struggling with their testimony, then I we're supposed to give them this book. I've I've heard this book will help them." Well, my question to them is then why is John Delin promoting Rough Stone Rolling as one of his top books when John Delin's top motivation is to lead people out of the church, not keep them in? Um, it's clearly due to this magical worldview. This magical the magical worldview is huge. It is one of the most fundamental as issues at heart in this faith crisis. Again, what we're discussing is this new narrative. This idea that Joseph Smith was a boy who gazed into stones and saw treasure that grew up to become a translator who looked in a stone and saw words, right? Joseph Smith goes and he uses this stone for occultic purposes and treasure digging. And then he says, "Oh, I'm a prophet of God now, so I'm going to take that stone and go and use it for God's work, and there's no problem." And that's where the Book of Mormon came from. That doesn't sit right. Richard Bushman says it may have taken four years after Moroni appeared for Joseph to purge himself of his treasure seeking greed. So we've got Joseph Smith here with treasure seeking greed. Joseph never repudiated the stones or denied their power to find treasure. Remnants of the magical culture stayed with him to the end. Right? So here's Joseph Smith giving us the temple endowment. Here's Joseph Smith in Liberty Jail. And here's Joseph Smith in Carthage jail ready to lay down his life. And here he is with all of these remnants of magical culture and occultism hanging on to him, influencing him and defining who he is as a prophet of God. This completely changes the way we see the restoration. Um because from a rough stone rolling perspective, magic had served its purpose in his life. In a sense, it was a preparatory gospel. So, not only is it part of his life, but it's actually supposed to have helped him be a better prophet. It prepared him for the priesthood. It was a preparatory gospel. This is this is the progressive narrative. And again, the question we need to ask ourselves is where did this come from? And is it true? Because if it's true, we all need to face the facts and we need to reassess our belief system. Wow, there is uh there is so much there, but I got to begin by just kind of defending myself. She kind of she kind of comes at me and claims that my goal or our goal on Mormon stories is to take people out of the church and to to weaken people's faith. And I just want to address that directly. I want to thank the commenters that uh came on in my defense. What I want with Mormon stories, what I've always wanted, even when I was a a semi-believing, active, faithful member for 10 years of Mormon stories at least, was just informed consent. I believe that people deserve to know the truth about the church they're giving their lives to. And I just want people to be able to know what they're paying 10% of their income to, what they're giving their lives to and supporting. Uh, but if people know the truth and they decide to stay in the church, I've got no problem with it. So, I take umbrage with her claim that my goal is to lead people out of the church. But other than that, uh, Jen, what do you think of her uh of her logic? Um, I don't know. I I just qu I don't even know what this Joseph Smith Foundation project maybe I need to look into that because she's making a good argument for like us, right? for people who who have studied and and researched and found these truth claims that were told us to us differently or not told to us at all. And she's kind of making the point for us. So, I'm a little confused. I think the Joseph Smith Foundation is like descendants of Joseph Smith who believe he was, you know, God's prophet. And so they're they're they're closely affiliated, I think, with Rodney Meldrum and the with the Heartland Theory people. Okay. But their their approach kind of like kind of like those who deny that Joseph Smith practiced polygamy. It's sort of the same argument. If if Joseph Smith practiced polygamy, then he couldn't have been a true prophet. So we've got to reinterpret the history to be that Joseph didn't practice polygamy. And it's the same thing. If Jo, her argument is if Joseph Smith was indeed a charlatan and a treasure digger, how could he have then credibly created the Book of Mormon, that would have been too much uh too much tom foolery. So, what we have to do is reinterpret the history to make it so he didn't uh practice treasure digging and that's the only way he could be a prophet. Okay. Well, let's do that for her. Let's help her out with that. Yeah. Yeah. All right. And Herardo and Mike, anything else you want to add to what Hannah had to say? You go first. Well, um, yeah. Well, I think you you did that. That probably was something that we should have mentioned before playing the clip, but basically, yeah, the Joseph Smith Foundation, one of their main claims is that Joseph Smith did not practice treasure digging. Um but as we know you know the church itself today uh accepts and publishes on their website on the Joseph Smith papers project um that in fact Joseph Smith and his family did practice and were involved in in treasure digging. So um I just think it's really nice that she makes the argument for us. Well, she really helps us as, you know, people who have uh had issues with this information. Um, our she helps our argument and help, you know, like how could Joseph Smith uh be a true prophet or how could he use this uh oult practices to later um translate the Book of Mormon. Yeah, it's a great setup. Really quickly before we bring you on, Mike, I'll just read um another comment that that makes a lot of sense. It it basically it there was a there's a viewer who wrote that this denial of Joseph Smith's treasure digging. Here it is. Scott Duke. Hey Scott. Uh great great to hear from you. Scott writes, "This reminds me of the push back from within the reorganized LDS church when they started to come clean about their own history. For a long long time, the RLDS church denied that Joseph Smith was a polygamist because it was just too hard to square that with him being a true prophet. And uh it's it's it's out of the same vein. Mike, what what did you want to add really quickly to add to you know, I I don't have a whole lot to add. I would just say that like, you know, when I when I said earlier that when you're talking about the ovary project I did, the two things were to look at it like a puzzle because if one piece has a problem and it connects to another, then you know, you're going to have more problems. And I think she's making that case for us. Like if he was a treasure digger and was deceiving people, that means that using that same method to translate the Book of Mormon is going to have problems. And I think that's why the church tried to downplay it. And then the second part is when I say you have to look at these things the same way you would another religion. You watch that video and you can see why. Because if you had told Hannah that Warren Jeffs was using a stone in receiving revelation, you know, in in modern times, she'd say that's absolute nonsense because that doesn't work. And yet you then have to replace and say, "Well, Joseph Smith did it. What do you think?" And then all of a sudden you're in that you're in that really tough spot of either having to say give special pleading to Joseph Smith or say, "You're right. This doesn't make sense." And so that's that's really all we need to say. And because as we get into it, we're going to make, you know, what she was asking uh us to to kind of show. I think we're going to show that. Yeah. And so, thank you Hannah Stoddard and the Joseph Smith Foundation for uh helping us see uh the truth more clearly. All right. So, let's go ahead and go to your next slide. Tell us the slide, Mike. So, this is a picture from Miners Hill, which is one of the treasure digs. And I I think Dan Vogle had said um his research led them to to go to this hill. And when I first heard about Joseph Smith doing treasure digging, my first thought in my head was like when you go to the beach and you got like a metal detector and you're digging these little holes for like coins or bottle caps, these are caves. They're not digging. When you say treasure digging, it's not a one day, couple hours thing. This is where they're going. They're digging into the sides of caves for weeks, sometimes longer than a month, and you could see how deep it is because someone went inside the hill, took a picture of them on the outside. I mean, this this was preserved from one of the treasure digs. So, this just keep this picture in mind as you hear this because this you want to downplay this into being a very small thing. It was a very big uh long operation um that kept people, you know, going with digging companies. So, just keep this picture in mind as we go. Okay. Massive digs. All right. So, you've got a timeline here. Yeah. So, this timeline is is pretty pretty uh generic, but just to point out again that in 1820, we're we're told the first vision took place. Historically, I don't believe that, but I'm just putting it in there. 1822 is when Joseph Smith finds uh the Peep/ Sears stone um that was dug at the Willard Chase property. Now, this is the stone that he is going to basically gain his credibility and charisma with as Dan Vogle would say um because this is a stone that people believe in. So, um let's go really quickly. Chase is uh Sally Chase was known as a treasure digger or a seer, right? And so because Sally Chase viewed this as a sear stone, it gave Joseph um the charisma to effectively use it and get people to believe. It's kind of like when you get a really good endorsement, you write a book or something, a really famous author that people respect endorse it. It gives you more credibility right off the top. And um so that's why we mentioned that because even though he may have started doing the trip going with on him earlier, this is when he's going to get his own stone that he can use. Um and and I think that's really important um kind of to this. And then um 1826 is the trial. So I'm jumping. Can I just Mike can I just reinform a point you were just making? Go ahead. We don't realize that part of the history that just like a magic mirror has powers or a magic crystal ball has powers. Yeah. It was essential for Joseph Smith to claim that he found a magic object. Yeah. Because at the time it was believed that the object had power. Yes. And then you needed a special seer who could use the magic object. And and that's just something that people don't realize. And Sam ask yourself, is it a magic object? And if so, the Mormon church has the sear stone right now. Exactly. Why why aren't the prophets, seers, and revelators using the magic object that they have now in their powers? I mean, heck, they have a magic object, right? And so, it's just really important piece of the puzzle that Joseph to be able to convince people that he could find buried treasure had to convince them like Sally Chase that he had found a magic object. Okay. Sorry, just had to reinforce I I think actually the narrative goes that uh Joseph borrowed Sally Chase's uh yeah deep stone because she had you know that stone had um certain reputation so he had to borrow hers for a while and then later I think it was actually Willer Chase's who actually found while digging and then Joseph was there Joseph grabbed it asked for it put it on his hat and said oh this you know this this works and then asked to borrow it and then kind of kept it. Is that right, Mike? I I think so. I think they found it, he used it, and I think he gives it back and then he goes back later and asks to borrow it again if I believe that's how Willard Chase tells it. And so he has it, he gives it back, and then he goes, that's going to be the stone that's used for treasure digs and the Book of Mormon translation and basically for the rest of, you know, his time in the church. Um he's going to be using the same stone. And so, you know, to the earlier point, it's like um you need the the person who can can give the charisma or at least get the credibility that they're seeing stuff, but you need that object that people believe is the vehicle um to, you know, give you that power. And so, you know, for, you know, to that point for the church today, they have the rock, right? And you would think they would use it, but no one does. And and you know it's because I think we look at it now in 2022 we're like that that's nonsensical but in 18 in 1820s and I don't want to go on a tangent too much but to give a a point of how believable this was to certain people. So after the church is formed um Hyram Page has a Sears stone and he's claiming to get revelations off of the same stone or not off Joseph stone he's claiming to get revelations about the church off of his stone. And it's so believable that some of the witnesses to the Book of Mormon believe that Hyram Page is receiving real revelations. And then Joseph Smith has to get a revelation from God saying that Hyrams is from the devil. Um so to the to that point, people in this area of around Joseph Smith were primed to believe that this is possible. And so all you need then is someone who can guide those people and channel that belief into their their own, you know, whether you want to call it ambitions or power or credibility. And and that's what Joseph did. Love it. Okay. So, let's uh let's go ahead and go back to the timeline now. Yeah. So, jump in. So, basically, I tried to make it somewhat generic just because we don't need to go into every we're not intending to go into every dig, but so he's doing these treasure digs for, you know, what four or five years, whatever. The 1826 trial happens. Um, and we'll cover that. And then after that, there's just a little bit of treasure digging. Um, Dan Vogle had kind of cited, and I think Mark also has some that are after. Um, and then in 1827, we have the account that Joseph promises to give up treasure digging um to Isaac Hail. And then after that, we're done except for one potential one that happens um in Salem in 1836. So that was just to give a really quick timeline before we dig in. So the heavy the heavy period of treasure digging with Joseph Smith is from 1820 to 1827. Yeah. With a little bit in 18 in the 1830s sprinkled in. Yeah. And I think there was some after the restoration of the church. Am I am I right, Mike? I have to look at Marks because from what I saw, um, the bulk of it was pretty much done by 1826. It was a little bit after. And then the Salem one isn't, we don't know if it's a traditional treasure date. It's kind of referred that way. Um, but I know Mark has a better Mark had a more thorough um, spreadsheet than what I had from Dan Vogle. So So we're showing it here on the screen. Yeah. So he's pretty much got what we had. So by 186 something around 1836 in and that's in the slide so we'll get to that one later. Yeah. So Mark, shout out again to Mark Elwood and his amazing book. What's his book called? Herardo. It's like glass looker, right? Glass. Yeah. Well, Mark's done Mark and his amazing uh partner as well. They've they've put together 41 different treasure digs that they attribute to Joseph Smith being a part of. And we'll share a link uh to that as well. But shout out to Mark Elwood. check out his book. We'll include a link to that book um in in the show notes. All right. Yeah, we can continue after that. Okay. So, let's uh let's continue. And so, um what we want to look at after the timeline is this is from Dan Vogle. So, um MarkX is more um comprehensive than this, but it was just to show so Dan had written a dialogue article. This was tacked at the end of it and I just put it on there because it was just a way to show that these are the treasure digs that we knew of. Mark has uncovered more or I don't know if uncovered is the right word. I'm not sure, but Mark has more of a list. So, you know, this is not a one-time thing. This is, you know, he did Mark had 41. So, there are a lot of these treasure digs. So, this was not like some isolated incident when we get to the 1826 trial. So, um you can find that on our overview. You can also um we'll share uh Mark's much more comprehensive list as well. So, we go to the next one. Uh all right. And in this one, you know, we talk about how treasure digging was done. Um, this is gonna sound familiar to to anyone who has been through the church, but um, they would be able to locate the buried treasure in the ground and then you would direct a team that would dig where you're pointing them to. Um, but the first thing they had to do um was to basically prepare the ground so that they could do it. And we have um, and this is kind of a somewhat of an aside, but this was one area where I really actually got pretty upset reading it because I had heard when I was doing some of the studying at first that Joseph Smith might have sacrificed dogs. And I'm a big dog person, so I was like, that sounds horrible. Um, we have three separate accounts, all independent of each other, um, that they sacrifice a dog. And just this one quote from Emily M. Austin where she says, um, for in the time of their digging money and not finding it attainable, Joe Smith told them there was a charm on the pots of money and if some animal was killed and the blood sprinkled around the place, then they could get it. So they killed a dog and tried this method of obtaining the precious metal. But again, money was scarce in those diggings. Still they dug and dug, but never came to the precious treasure. Alas, how vivid was the expectation when the blood of poor Trey was used to take off the charm and after all to find their mistake that it did not speak better things than that of Abel. And now they were obliged to give up in despair and Joseph went home again to his father's impalmyra. And I'll just note that's a late source, but there on the overview project there's three different sources all giving the same thing. Um Dan Vogle talked about it too. They have accounts of him sacrificing I think goats and they said you like a black sheep I believe them you know it's just Jen you have a sad face. Why do you have a sad face J? I'm like crying actually. Why? Because I have three dogs and I have goats. I live on a little urban farm. Yeah. And like I love my animals. Like that really disturbs me. Yeah. I'm just gonna say it like really disturbs me. Yeah. Me too. And you know, um I I realize I will not in any way say that in 18 in the 1820s they view dogs the same way they do now. I totally accept that. That being said, um once you realize that there are no treasure guardian spirits guarding these dogs, the thought that you're like slitting a dog's throat open to to draw blood uh for nothing to deceive people, that is where I'm like, okay, sheep or a sheep. A little lamb. about this a little bit though like according to the to the church's narrative by this point Joseph would have already seen God and Jesus he would have already received several visitations three in one night from the angel Moroni giving him all night instructions from like an angel you know like an angelic like celestial being um he would have had been going every year to the hill to receive even more instructions And then at the same time, we have him practicing all this oult and magic witchcraft kind of stuff to find treasure. Like h how to me that doesn't make sense in my mind unless you make in my mind the only way it makes sense is that the Moroni visitations, Jesus and the father appearing are later fabrications um and added into the story. Yeah, that's a great point because if he's seeing God and Jesus in 1820, seeing Moroni multiple times, being tutored by God, why in the world is he leading? And then he but but we also know that he admits by 1827 to his father-in-law, Emma's dad, Isaac Hail, that he never saw anything to the in the stone to begin with. And we know that they never found any treasure ever and that it was illegal. It makes no sense that God's chosen holy prophet is not only defrauding people for seven years with illegal activity, but slitting the throat of animals knowing that that he's really leading people on fool foolish treasure digs. Yeah, that's a problem. I didn't like I didn't think it could I didn't think it could get worse after just knowing it just got worse. Yeah. Like it just got worse with knowing what Herardo Herardo just said. like the timing of that and in the back of my mind I also have going like if I don't know when the like Jesus was the ultimate sacrifice if he's and you're not supposed to sacrifice animals past the atonement like if he believed that or not. I don't know. There's a whole bunch of things are now like going through my head um about timing and narrative and teachings and things like like that. Sorry. Yeah, I'm in like a No. Am I scene going on right now? That's part of why we like having you here, Jen, because you you more recently went through your faith crisis, so you can give a little bit more of a fresh reaction. We really like that. Yeah. Yeah. And Mark Mark Elwood just made a comment. We're really grateful. Erin, Erin is here in the chat as well as Mark. Aaron Elwood is Mark's partner and they together have done this this amazing book, The Glass Looker. Mark writes, "By my count, I have six treasure digs that include an animal sacrifice where Joseph was present." And we're kind of beating a dead horseed and piling on, but we appreciate Mark and Aaron's. No, you know, and I only bring it up because for me that was one of those few areas by the time I did the overview project, I was past that angry phase. The only thing that still really gets me sometimes is polygamy. And there are a few things where you'll see, but for some reason, just being a dog person, it just really frustrated me. And the only small push back I'll make is on the Isaac Hail comment where Joseph Smith says he never saw anything. That's another area where for me I stay away from that only because it's written in 1833. There is an affidavit from Isaac Hail's son, but you got to remember at that point they hate him. So I don't know if Joseph would admitted would have admitted he never saw anything and then then claim he did. But again, we we have evidence that he said it. It's just to be clear, it's evidence that comes from a source that they do not like Joseph because he did steal their daughter and was doing practices that they obviously hated. Um, so he might have said it, he might not have, but it's just to point that out. Well, I'm just going to say, Mike, I think it's valuable to make that sort of disclaimer. No, it I think it's egregious what the church has done, which is to basically just say any of the Herbit affidavits. Yeah. Anything in Mormonism unveiled, we have to completely throw away. Yeah. because it's all anti- Mormon. Freaking Isaac Hail was Joseph's father-in-law. He was Emma's dad and he was a first person witness to the Josiah stole treasure digs and he was a first person witness to the translations of the Book of Mormon and he was invested. And so uh and so for that re reason at least those accounts deserve to be mentioned. They do. They do. But but maybe with an asterisk to say, "Hey, they may have been a little bit salty." But they were salty for a reason, right? They were. And and and so that's the thing, like you can't blame. Um so I believe, and I'm going off top my head here, I believe the two accounts of that are Pomeroy Tucker wrote a letter that has it. And the affidavit I believe is is um Isaac Hail's son, Alvin or Aan or something like that. So we have two sources. One is from the son. So, it's, you know, I guess you could you could call it a first if he was there or a secondhand witness, but there are two sources. It's worth noting because of the fact that, you know, there's two sources. Even if you think they are antagonistic, um, you need to note it. And, you know, again, the whole point of that encounter is that he is upset with Joseph Smith for taking his daughter and aloping with her. So, you could have Joseph really trying to uh make amends. And in that, he may have said that. I I just for me that's so reason I'm I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just saying that's one area where I would just give a little bit of push back just just to clarify that we you know I don't want to run with that as absolute truth. But to your point, you also can't throw it out just because of the fact that Isaac Hale didn't like Joseph. And I think it's not honestly Joseph accepting that he couldn't see anything on his own. Um it's not necessary. Like I think everyone would agree that there was never treasure, right? uh hidden by the Spaniards and and like that would be slippery and guarded by guardian spirits that you would have to kill animals for, right? To retrieve. So, and there's also no one disputing that this was known, fraudulent and illegal activity. Exactly. Y 100%. Okay. So, let's uh let's move on to the guardian spirits because guardian spirits in my view become Moroni. Yeah. And that's and that's just it. So this is why again I talk about how these things these are puzzle pieces that are going to connect. And so in this one in the folk folklore one of the the I think Captain Kid stories has basically Captain Kid's going to bury this treasure I believe and then he slits the throat of one of the people he's with and tosses them in with the with the chest. And by doing this that dead person is now going to guard this treasure which again makes no sense because if I'm out with John and John's digging a hole he puts some treasure and slits my throat and throws me in. The last thing I'm doing is helping John protect treasure. That's beside the point, but um that's kind of the folklore is that these dead people are buried with the treasure to protect it and that you have to then um find a way to break that enchantment. And this is going to be how the early accounts of Nephi or Moroni depending on, you know, they they kind of mix the names up in the early accounts. That's how they are presented as Joseph Smith tells these early visitations almost as if they're treasure guardians as opposed to being like these angelic beings that would come down uh like we would later hear with like say Peter, James, and John. So, this is going to connect directly into the Book of Mormon um gold plates um story as we go. Yeah. And if I can just kind of uh just add two cents to that, what what we haven't really given people the background for that are brand new to this issue is that in New England in the early 1800s, there was this fascination with pirates, with uh Spanish concistadors. And like like we mentioned earlier that either these pirates or these Spanish concistadors or even Native Americans buried super valuable treasure and then you add to that the the the spirits who guarded the treasure. This is literally why these gullible largely uneducated farmers who were poor were running around trying to find the buried treasure um uh to to try and become rich because farming wasn't super fun. And this is why they needed a sear or someone a magical pee stone, you know, scrier or glass looker. They needed that magic person to help them find the magic treasure and to break through the protections of the guardian spirit. And this is all just really fundamental to understanding the con frankly. Is that right, Mike? No, I mean that's the whole thing. in order to believe any of this is possible, you have to believe that there were these giant, you know, gold and silver mines buried. Um, you know, and and and we've never found it. So, again, this is a huge prerequisite to this even being possible is that this has to happen. Um, and because there were all these treasure lers being told, people began to believe it and look for it. Um, again, just as you would find today or, you know, if people have like these get-rich quick schemes thinking that you could do, you know, something quickly, it's the same basic premise. And um but yeah, I mean it it just didn't like Herardo said earlier, it just didn't happen. And so everything that comes from this comes from something that's not true, if that makes sense. So totally. So Moroni becomes the spirit guarding the slippery treasure later. Yeah. And because uh Dan Vogle talked about I think with you um that those early visitation stories were in the middle of his prime treasure digging. So, he might have been telling those stories to people as they're doing other treasure digs. Um, is maybe it's a way to to tell stories while you're doing it. Maybe it's a way for him to test out some ideas that he's working on his head that he could use later. I don't know. That's speculative. But in the early stages of this story about the plates, when you're talking about 1823, they would have been presented as treasure guardians and not as angelic beings that were coming down um to tell them about a preservation of ancient records. I think the earliest or some of the like the accounts that we have of what happened in 1823 when Joseph starts talking about the or first mentions the plates um uh they don't mention you know that it was Moroni or Nephi or it's just you know the the guardian spirit or or the angel. Yeah. Um, and I think it's really interesting how you can connect how Joseph is learning how to incorporate a lot of these um techniques to make people believe uh that he could find treasure. You know, he gets the idea of the hat and the stone. We know his dad used that. We know Chase used that. um the idea of you know sacrificing animals and doing all these rituals drawing a circle on on on the on you know on um on the soil um that that comes from I think ah my goodness the name um just popped right out of my head sorry but but like we we know who was kind of like using this techniques that he can later incorporate on his own treasure diggings yeah because he's learning it as a young, you know, teenager or whatever from his dad because his dad believes that then there's Lumen Walters who's out there. I'm trying to think the other names. So, yeah, he's and that's the thing like in a way you kind of look at like an apprentice, right? So, he's doing these early digs with his dad. He's learning how to do things and then he then can take over because he finds out how to get people and again this is, you know, my speculation a little bit, but he's learning how to get people to believe him. And once he can almost project more power than those he's working with, people are going to go to him because of course you want to go with the person who's most likely to find it. Right. Love it. Okay. All right. Next one. So we got So we got guardian spirits as part of the formula. What's next? And so the methods of treasure digging, this is what I meant when I said that this will sound familiar because they would go out and Joseph would put his peeples/ sear stone in the hat, put his face completely in the hat, and then he would claim he could see the location from the stone in the hat. And so we have these two quotes. They're both from 1833. I know they're a little late, but um it's William Stafford said, "Which Joseph Jr. could see by placing a stone of singular appearance in his hat in such a manner to exclude all light at which time they pretended he could see things within and under the earth." And then there's Joseph Capron who says, "This power he pretended to have received through the medium of a stone of peculiar quality. The stone was placed in a hat in such a manner as to exclude all light except that which emanated from the stone itself. this light of the stone he pretended enabled him to see anything he wished. And so this is just to say that when we get into the the translation, you know, couple overview topics from now, this is literally the genesis of how the Book of Mormon translation process is. And while these accounts are late and obviously you can tell from from the quotes that they're not believers and him having a power, the fact that they replicate the trans translation method so well and they were not involved in the Book of Mormon translation tells you that Joseph Smith was doing the same thing with treasure digging that he's going to do with the Book of Mormon. That's really two quotes I think that summarize that really well. So, so far we've got in both treasure digging and the Book of Mormon. We've got treasure digging. We've got a a magic object, stone in a hat. Yep. We've got a sear or a scrier or a glass looker. And we've got a guardian spirit guarding the treasure that's slippery. We've got that those four things in both narratives. Is that what you're saying? Yep. Okay. All right. All right. What's uh so tell us why treasure digging failed. Yeah. And so this is just a few of the reasons because that's the whole thing. The treasure diggings always fail. So you need to have a reason why they failed, right? And so the different reasons at least I came across were one, the incantations were not said right. Uh the rituals were not followed in the exact way they needed to be. Um the guardian spirits became too strong um and overpowered the sear's ability to see it. Um someone made a mistake during the digging process and might have offended the spirits or caused them to to dig deeper. And the point is there's a lot of reasons, but it's always the fault of something that went wrong. It's never the fault of like it's not like Joseph Smith would say, "Oh crap, you know, I I mistook that for something else or any other treasure digger. It's always in in something else." And again, I don't want to foreshadow too much, but this is another tactic you see um in a lot of the early revelations when they're saying this will work if your hearts are good or if you're righteous or if you follow the word. There's always an out, you know, and so with treasure digging, the seer or the person that's running this has to always have an out that isn't pointed back at him because it can never be the failure of the person who claims to see it. And so we have all of these different examples of where they point to something going wrong even though we we realize today that at no point is that the reason that they failed. And and and again where this where this tactic rep reappears in the Book of Mormon narrative is, you know, there's the example of Joseph Smith having to go back to the site for multiple years before he's able to get the treasure. Or there's the Martin Harris losing of the 116 pages where as soon as he as soon as Martin Harris loses the 116 pages, Joseph is told that he has to he loses his ability to translate for several months, which you know could be that God's taking away his power because of wickedness, even though God foresaw it. Or it very well could be that Joseph needs time to recreate the pages that got lost. And it's part of this this long-standing habit of needing some sort of out to buy to buy time or to explain why all of a sudden the powers as they were presented are no longer working. Is that right? Well, I think the most simplest way to look at it for me is with treasure digging, with him being a prophet and getting revelations is when he's in control, he can make it work. And the moment he doesn't have control, it doesn't work. And so with treasure digging, you can control up to a certain point, but up to a certain at a certain point, you have to stop digging because you're not going to find it. And so, um, you see that with revelations, too. You can control revelations, you can control, like I could prophesy that I'm going to eat at McDonald's this week and I can go to McDonald's and do it because I'm in control of that. But if I'm in jail, I can't prophesy, you know what I mean? And so, um, that with 116 pages, that's a great example of where Joseph Smith loses control of the situation. And because of that, he doesn't have answers because once you lose control, the magic is gone. And so then you have to find a new way to do it. And um is a bit unfortunate. The 116 pages overview is one of my favorites because I think it's one we don't talk about enough. But um but yeah, to your point, it's it's about being in control because if you can portray that you're in control of a situation, you can make people believe and keep them believing. But with treasure digging, it always has an end because you can only dig so far. I love it. Jen, Jen, you had a comment you wanted to make. Sorry, I have so much things coming up today in this this episode, but um I just wanted to pause for a second and just um acknowledge all the people that are now sitting with the thought in their mind like um I think Anna said um this is where maybe where the the shame started where I if you're faithful enough then then your patriarchal blessing will come true. Yeah. Or if if this then that it comes from treasure digging. It comes from my legal activity. It comes from this part of the LDS history. It's just kind of it's this is actually a big part of my faith crisis. It's actually where I started researching and and moving. One day I'll tell my story. John keeps asking me to. One day I will. I promise. But um the that question like are you it's not happening because you're not faithful enough is like to just hear that it might have come from this and it's been there the whole time is just really hitting me hard right now. So yeah, thank you Jen. And uh we love it that you're bringing in the the human aspect. And I'm just going to add if we if if anyone wants to refer to Luna Lindseay Corbden's series from their book recovering agency, one of the 31 uh techniques of undue influence is called blame reversal. So if you think about Jen, the the churches including ours that prophesied that that Jesus would come at a certain year or when Joseph Smith prophesied that they would go down to Missouri and you know Zion's camp and they would beat the Missouri militias or whatever and then the prophecy doesn't come true. Jesus doesn't come in the year predicted or uh you know they don't Zion's camp doesn't win against the Missouri militia. The quote prophets always need a way to excuse that the prophecy doesn't come true. And so that technique is called blame reversal where when Jesus doesn't come at the year specified, the prophet will say, "Well, it's because you the members weren't worthy." And that's the way that they can preserve their power and their reputation. How much that's just so sad. Like it's just so sad that they're going to like like I just I'm feeling so much right now for like all the people that like that blame and that shame that that tactic like hurt people like it hurt people. It hurt families. It like made people think they weren't good enough. You like you are good enough. I just want people to know you're good enough, you're whole. Yeah. Yeah. But it's also it is the one of the most insidious parts of Christianity because you're put on this treadmill of righteousness and worthiness and you're told if you have enough faith, if you believe enough, if you're obedient enough, then good things will happen. But then what happens when the good things don't happen? Well, then the church always needs a way to explain that away. And they'll say, "Well, you weren't doing it righteous. You weren't righteous enough." And it I'm not saying it's intentional on the church's part. I'm not saying it was necessarily even intentional on Joseph's part, but but that's the way it has to work. And by the way, so many people ask Jen, you know, why, you know, during this trial that we're about to talk about, the question that's going to come up is why were so many people who were at the treasure digs willing to continue testifying that Joseph Smith did have power? Because there are all these people that went on the treasure digs with Joseph Smith. They went on multiple treasure digs with Joseph Smith and never was any treasure found. So, how did Joseph get these followers to believe failed treasure dig after failed treasure dig after failed treasure dig? How did they continue believing that Joseph had special powers when every single time they're digging, they're digging, they're digging. They're for days, multiple people, sometimes up to 14 diggers digging, digging, digging. They get to the point where there's supposed to be treasure. And then Joseph's like, "Up, up, the treasure got pulled away." How did they keep believing? And the answer is Joseph would turn it back on the diggers and say, "Well, you didn't do it quite right." Then all of a sudden, they feel guilt. Then all of a sudden they feel shame. Then all of a sudden they feel culpable. And then they don't ever stop to think that maybe Joseph doesn't have the power. Instead it's like, well, I'm not good enough. I didn't do it right. I'm not worthy enough. And if I could just do it right the next time, we'll finally get the treasure. That's how it works. Yeah, I can see that's how it's worked in a lot of areas now. Yeah, it's hard. It's hard. All right. Herardo, Herardo, and Mike, do you guys want to add anything or should we go to the trial? Uh, probably go to the trial. I just one thing I want to add is like, you know, one of the things about treasure digging that will be continued into Mormonism is you're offloading the requirement of this working onto the people with it. And so with treasure digging, like you said, it might not be that you're going to blame one specific digger, but you might just say, you know what, I can't see it anymore. We must have done something wrong. It might not be like super specific. Um, and I would I would say in Christianity there are such varying degrees of that. So, I mean, I I've been involved in churches where you just don't feel like at any point you're not good enough. It just feels like they'll tell you you will be saved just by trying to be a better person. You don't have to get there. Um, and then when you get to like Mormonism, obviously you're you're at the other end of the spectrum where it is shifting that blame on you. You will get these blessings if you do this. You will be able to fulfill your patriarch patriarchal blessing if you obey what we tell you. And so, um, yeah, I think one of the things Joseph Smith was really good at was, um, finding ways to push the responsibility of fulfilling a promise away from him and onto someone else. And that's just really all I'd say on that before we move on. All right. Well, let's uh let's move on to the 1826 trial of Joseph Smith. It's a very important trial because it's what ends ultimately it's what ends treasure digging career. Yeah. This is ultimately going to be where he kind of hits, you know, the thing with treasure digging is you're you're constantly kind of flying too close to the sun. And this one, I think, is where he finally realizes, yeah, this is not going to work. All right, let's talk about it. So, Joseph Smith was digging um for Josiah Stole. Josiah Stole by some accounts came to Joseph because Joseph had a reputation. Remember, when you look at Mark's list, he's digging for a lot of people. Word of mouth among this community is going to spread. Um Josiah's nephew at one point, because remember, they're digging for weeks, not just a day or two. um he realizes what's going on. He files a complaint and he says uh Mr. Stole is represented as not as being not a very bright man, but he had saved considerable money for those times and Joe Smith managed to get and spend most of it. And as John said earlier, this is fascinating because this trial gives us a glimpse into how people can continue to believe and sometimes even stronger when things fail. And so we have Josiah's nephew realizing this is this is absolutely uh my you know my uncle's being taken advantage of. Um so he tries to stop it but the person being taken advantage of still believes that it's absolutely happening. And so this is a really important trial um to John said not just because of what happens but because it gives us more insight into why people do continue to believe even even when they're in the middle of something that tells you that there should be some red flags going off. Yeah. I think we've all had loved ones who believed in sort of superstitious or un unhealthy or non-science-based things. And I think I think it's important to note that whether it's Josiah Stole's family members or others or or Lucy Harris, right? Yeah. There were people surrounding a lot of these gullible superstitious followers who were saying this is this is all a problem. Yeah. And it's important to have them as witnesses. So, so yeah, how does that apply to the trial? So, okay, so we'll go to the next slide because I think the next one has some quotes and um so we have Jonathan Thompson who says he reported digging with the sear in pursuit of a chest of money. Um this person says that he struck his spade upon probably the chest but on account of enchantment the trunk settling away from under them while digging. Uh Josiah stole himself. Um described a dig in which money moved down beyond their reach. And and so this is showing that the people that were involved in the in these in these um treasure digging hunts believe that they're a part of it. You know, he believed he struck the spade of the treasure chest that Joseph um had described and maybe he hit a rock, maybe he hit clay, but because he believed what Joseph was telling him, he said he envisioned himself hitting a treasure chest. And Josiah stole, we'll get to in a few slides, but same process. And so this is why this trial to me is so damning because it shows how Joseph Smith has the ability to get people to believe what he's seeing that they're that they're a part of it, you know, and and so that's going to be important as we continue on as well. And um quote really important. Yeah. So this Hugh Nibi quote at the end is important because he said, "If this court record is authentic, it is the most damning evidence in existence against Joseph Smith and that it would be the most devastating blow to Smith ever delivered." Which is close to what Hannah Stoddard said as well. And that's what Joseph Fielding Smith, prophet sir and revelator believed as well. He denied that Joseph Smith used the sear stone in the hat. And again, Hugh Nibbi uh denied that that this trial ever took place. Right? And and he was paid by the church to make those apologetic arguments. Now, fast forward 20 or 30 years, because of Mormon scholarship, the church has been forced to acknowledge what they paid people to professionally deny with PhDs just a few uh decades previous, right? Yeah. Do you mind do you want to just tell the um if it's fresh on your mind just the quick story of how were we able to prove that this trial document was authentic? I think we do we show the slide coming up. Yeah, show the next slide. We can kind of go we'll go through that in the next few I think. Okay. Okay. Um so the next slide is a scan um they found Wes Walters I believe found it in the 70s. Um, and this is one of those things I think where you know it's hard to know exactly what all of it is, but it it does match up with at the um some of the earlier records were transcribed into a newspaper, not word for word, but they had accounts of the of the trial in the newspaper which were reported. This matches that. And I don't think that there are any um like again I'm saying reputable, which I know is a generic term. I don't think there's too many scholars who are saying that this is false. I know there are a few people that think uh Wes Walters wanted to defame Joseph. I don't think there are many people saying that he forged this though. Well, this went Sorry. No, go ahead, Roberto. So, I think how it went is like from what I understand the newspaper was printed in Utah. Yes. And in Utah, we had, you know, the transcript of, I mean, it was called a transcript, but it was kind of like a summary of the testimonies. So we had the record but most apologists including Hunibly would say like well this is not really authentic. We can't really prove you know that it's it's real. But then we have uh this Christian pastor who goes and uh goes to wherever this record would have been and he finds it on the courthouse like on on their archives and and then the information there matches identically, you know, the information on the on on the transcript that we already had. And that's how they were able to prove uh that that the the court record was authentic. Yes. And to the point where Joseph Smith papers project sponsored by the church includes the the trial record and on the project. Yeah. So if you go to the next slide really quick. I think what's really important about this is prior to the 1970s you have the again we've already made this point. The Mormon church is denying that Joseph Smith was a treasure digger while they had Joseph Smith Searstone in their vault. Right? You've got Joseph Illing Smith ripping pages out of journals to hide the church's true history. They're paying a PhD level apologist at BYU to shoot down and deny all of these things. And it takes a Christian minister, historian, pastor to go dig up the true uh court records to prove that this stuff happened. And then even when Wesley Walters presents it, an army of BYU apologists in the 60s and 70s or whatever are actively denying that the record's credible. They're shooting down that that this is a credible document. And there it takes decades I think for the church to finally at least a decade if not more for the church to acknowledge that this was indeed a credible trial credible document and then it even takes more decades for the church to publish you know an essay a gospel topics essay that finally admits to the broad church membership. Yeah. This all that but all the stuff that they denied and hid and and lied about uh ended up being true. Yeah. Yeah. I think that's fair. All right. Yeah. So, this is a picture of the of the uh the record that was found. And then the next slide um you know this is like we had talked about this is contested by apologists and critics but um there's a docket entry in 1826 that outlines the case against Joseph Smith and it ends with the statement of and therefore the court finds the defendant guilty. And this is also in the Joseph Smith paper project. So this is not just me pulling a source that's contested by the church. This is in their own Joseph Smith paper project. Um, Constable Philip Dang um had a bill that included 10 miles travel and um as Dan Vogle points out after Joseph Smith goes through this trial, he lives uh and works on the Joseph uh Knight Senior property. And so that's about 10 miles from where this courthouse would have been. So, it's possible that this bill was his way of charging the court to take Joseph Smith to 10 miles um basically as a way um as he speculates, which makes sense that they kind of just said, you know, get out of here and don't come back for six months or a year or whatever it is. um because they're not obviously this is today we look at this as a big deal because it's you know Joseph Smith but again back then he's just a dude being charged with disorderly conduct for what probably would we would think of today as like you know small time fraudulent activities this isn't like you know um I can't remember the guy's name who did the giant Ponzi scheme in New York which is eluding me right now but yeah it's just it this would moff yeah Bernie Maidoff this isn't Bernie Maidoff this is a guy that today we look as a big figure because of being involved olved in the church. But yeah, so they probably would say, "We don't want to do a full trial. We think you're guilty enough to go to the trial, or we think you're guilty, but just get out of here and we're just going to let it go." Um, and and those things all add up to pointing to that, which is to say that there is really good reason to think he was either found guilty or they found him guilty enough to where they would have proceeded had he not left. Yep. So for me, the summary is treasure digging was illegal. Yeah. Joseph Smith did it. He not only did it, but he was brought in front of a court of law. Yep. And he was found guilty and the and he was sort of let go after being found guilty. So, he didn't actually serve long jail time or anything. But all those facts are completely indisputable. And we actually had a commenter earlier up say that we're basically lying and and misrepresenting the truth and, you know, with devious motives. This is it right here. Here, I'll just read it. And I I don't mean to shame this person, but Sion Taluli says, "You guys trying to get attention and money from trying to accuse someone without evidence. Gold digger is the proper name for your podcast, Cion. We don't, you know, we wish you well. We're not going to shame you. We're not going to belittle you. But we understand, Cion, why you are saying that we're accusing people without evidence. You are a victim of of the LDS church with good intentions misleading its membership and or hiding the truth from its membership for basically two centuries until just the past few years. And even now with the gospel topics essays, the Mormon church has admitted it does not want the general membership to read the gospel topics essays. And we know for a fact in 2022, 2021, what year are we in? 2022 that most Mormon bishops do not even know the Gospel Topics essays exist, let alone have they read them because even now the Mormon church wants the essays to be out there, but they don't want anybody reading them um or or they're going to potentially lose their faith. So, Sion, we're not going to get mad at you or shame you for calling us um you know, deceivers. It's you're a victim of of the church misleading people. Yeah. I just Oh, go ahead. Go ahead, Roberto. I do want to note that uh while he says that this is without evidence, this is like this this trial record is on the Joseph Smith papers project. Like I don't think you can get more official from, you know, an more official than that. Um it's not on Fair Mormon. It's not, you know, like in any third party apologist website. It's I I mean the brethren promote, they talk. We have, you know, this uh video where M. Russell Ballard is saying like I have all Joseph Smith papers project on my on my home. I I've read most of some of them and and he says like we're open and and and this is sponsored by the church. So yeah, it's hard to say that this is um this is not credible evidence. Yeah. And I would just add for myself, I don't take any money from the website. Um, so I know that comment's directed at the podcast, but so if you want to throw it at me, I I don't take any money. So the I I don't make anything from this. Um, and the second part is, and I tell this people when they email me, it's just like if you disagree, show me. If you want to um get into the actual evidence for it, then show me where I'm wrong. And I'm happy to. I've changed a few things where people have said, "You need to look at this." And I do, and I say, you know what? Yeah, that's right. And on the flip side, if you can't show your work, you can't make those accusations. like you have to dive in if you want to engage in this. You can't sit on the side and yell in that you don't believe it. And that that's kind of what I was talking about early on. It's like it's hard to do that, but until you can, you can't really have that conversation. I love it. Okay, Mike. Well, you've got about 30 minutes left before you got to go. So, let's go ahead and go to uh the next slide. Yep. So, next slide is just kind of the aftermath. And we've kind of hinted at that already, but basically at this point, Joseph's flying too close to the sun. And we have in the Joseph Smith paper um this uh quote where they basically say that Joseph Smith senior is reported it as saying at the 1826 trial that both he and his son were mortified that his wonderful power which God had so miraculously given him should be used only in search of filthy Lucer. He said his constant prayer to heavenly father was to manifest his will concerning this marvelous power. He trusted that the son of righteousness would someday illuminate the heart of of the boy and enable him to see his will concerning him. So effectively saying, "My son needs to stop this treasure digging and use this power for something else." And we obviously know that's going to happen. And what this kind of shows maybe is that Joseph Smith was fooling his own dad. Yeah, I think that's fair because this shows the the dad believing that this was foolishness and that Joseph had admitted to him that it was foolishness. In other words, not uh spiritually credible. Yeah. So it means that Joseph Smith's dad believed that Joseph had special powers, but that he was misusing the special powers. Yeah. Yeah. Well, we we know that actually when he when he when Joseph first mentions the plates, when he comes up with, you know, the story of the blades is during an argument that uh Lucy, his mom, and his dad are having regarding religious issues. Uh, I think Jan Bogle says it was a pretty strong argument that they they were pretty heated argument that they were having and Joseph comes up with this idea of plates in the hill uh that written by a Native American prophet so he could help, you know, solve this uh family or his parents argument regarding religious issues. And he I think how it goes. I mean, you can correct me if I'm wrong, Mike, but he at some point I think it's at this point where he kind of like channels what the plates say and kind of like does this thing where he where he can read what the plates are saying to kind of end the argument with his parents. Is that correct? I think so. I mean, it's a little speculative just because of the accounts. I think Lucy Max says her long after, but basically he's telling these stories at night to the family for hours on end. And I think in a way that is helping to bridge that divide, but you know, um that's a little hard to say just because I think that's happening before she joins the Methodist church. I'll have to check that for for next time, though. All right. Well, let's go ahead and go on to the next slide where we talk about the 1836 Salem Treasure Revelation. And I think that's a really important slide to topic to discuss because you ju just to give a little bit of the background, right? Like, okay, yes, Joseph Smith is alleged to alleged alleged to have stopped treasure digging in the late 1820s, but it wasn't the last time that he did it, right? Yeah. And and and this is different because we don't have any record of him digging, but basically at this point, the church is heavily in debt. They need they need to find a way to pay it. And the Joseph Smith paper basically says that, you know, this is gonna become DNC11, which we'll get to on the next one. But, um, Joseph Smith is apparently told that there's much treasure in Salem. Um, and apparently they think that someone had been over there and then told Joseph they had heard rumors that there's this buried treasure somewhere, hidden treasure. And in 1843, um, 16-year-old dissident James C. Brewster briefly mentions treasure hunting in relation to the trip. and Ebenezer Robinson in 1889, which again is long after, uh, links this to um, a search for treasure. And so they, this is a Joseph Smith paper, so of course it's going to be a little softer, but I just want to lay that out there because when we get to the next slide, it's going to be pretty clear from the revelation itself that this is about finding treasure. What why are you why are you mentioning the Salem treasure expedition now, Mike? What is your point by bringing this up right now in the presentation? just following the timeline that there was at least one more attempt to find um hidden money after he had already ended it. So, you know, the church will kind of say, well, he never engaged in it after he got the gold plates. But even here, unless you want to downplay the fact that he's out there looking for money, it it shows that he was still engaging in this idea that you could find it. But again, this also could give point to the fact that Joseph did have a magical worldview himself. So maybe he believed when the other people said there was hidden treasure that they could go out there and find it. Which again it makes it shows how kind of nuanced all of this can be and squishy when you're trying to figure out, you know, who is intending to do what. Yeah, I think that's a really important point that like this would be after the alleged first vision, after the formation of the Book of Mormon, after the formation of the church, after the receiving of of alleged receiving of the ironic and the Mechisedcic priesthood, maybe even after the the sealing powers, seeing, you know, Peter, James, and John and Elijah and Jesus and God, Joseph Smith is still perpetuating this idea that he has the power to find, buried treasure. And of course, he never finds the buried treasure, right? So, if you go to the next slide, I just think it's important because this is going to be DNC 111. And um so, basically what we see here, and I'm just going to go through some real quick where in the in the revelation, it says, "I have much treasure in this city for you for the benefit of Zion, and many people in the city to whom I will gather out in due time for the benefit of Zion through your instrumentality uh through instrumentality. Therefore, it is expedient that you should form acquaintance with men in the city, as you shall be led, and as it shall be given you, and it shall come to pass in due time, that I will give the city into your hands, that you shall have power over it, in so much that they will not discover your secret parts, and its wealth pertaining to gold and silver shall be yours. Concern yourself not about debts, for I will give you power to pay them." So, Joseph Smith is receiving a revelation that he's going to find this treasure. And they never do. And he also is given a revelation that the city's going to come under his power so he can get what he needs. Doesn't happen. And so again, this is this is a different scenario than the earlier treasure digs because of the fact that he's not going to go out there and just start walking in the hills. But he must have heard as the accounts say that there was this treasure somewhere. And he goes out there and maybe he's using the revelation to convince people going with him that they can find it. That would be the most likely thing. But um it does show that there was this treasure seeking um aspect of Joseph Smith that he continues after, you know, long after the Book of Mormon. And not only that, but he's willing to put that in the voice of God, not just his own, you know, rock and a hat. This is the voice of God telling him, "There's gold and silver here, and I'm going to help you find it." And he doesn't. Something else that that's really important, Mike, and something else that I don't think we're going to be covering this time is this treasure digging, slippery treasure. Yeah. Meme is also found in the Book of Mormon itself. Because if you read the actual text of the Book of Mormon, prophets will write down and talk about there being treasure buried throughout the land. And I think it's even called slippery treasure and that this treasure gets removed when when people try and dig for it. So this motif uh this this lore of superstitious folk magic buried treasure that's slippery makes it into quote the you know inspired you know god god's most correct book translation of an ancient record. Yeah we'll see that that's on the I think I have it on the last slide so that we'll we'll get to that real quick at the end. I'm sorry I'm I'm No, you're fine. You're good. Your thunder a little bit. Okay. No, you're fine. And so, um, the one thing I want to cover, and I know I've got about 18 minutes, so um, we have two accounts here where we can show that Joseph Smith is willing to deceive. So, you can make the question of, do we believe Joseph Smith thought he had this power? And we can't answer that because we're not there. But, we can show that he was willing to deceive. So, Jesse Townsen um, had written a letter to Pomroy Tucker. Now remember people do say that those are antagonistic sources but again when you read the account he has had a stone into which when placed in a hat he pretended to look and see chest of money buried in the earth. He was also a fortune teller and he claimed to know where the stolen good went probably too well. And he's saying and we have accounts where someone's cow might go missing and then Joseph Smith can find it quickly. And the whole thing is again as I said earlier when you're in control you can make things happen. When you're in control of hiding something you can make things happen. And that leads us to this Josiah stole one, which is where this is from a 2002 Fair Mormon conference. But um during the Josiah stole digging um he was told that the treasure chest had a feather on top of it. And so um at one point during the dig, they find the feather, but the money's gone. The treasure chest is gone. And the reason we know that this is outright deception is because if you put a feather in the ground, it will decompose in just a few months. So, in order to find a feather without the chest in a hill that is, we saw from the picture earlier, these are giant hills that are not like constantly being, you know, dug up. These are formed from the glaciers that they're just not they're they're untouched. And so, there is no way a feather is in that ground because it would be gone. It would be unrecognizable, be decomposed, disintegrated if it ever was there. So to find a feather where Joseph Smith says it would be makes you have to logically say Joseph Smith likely puts the feather there and then as he's telling the treasure party uh where to dig, he knows to kind of lead him that way. And all of a sudden they dig up the feather and it keeps the the target believing that even though you didn't find the ultimate goal that you weren't being duped and I think that's really important to show that Joseph Smith was willing to deceive. Yeah. And then and this is where again this early point you made about all the puzzle pieces and then seeing them in aggregate really comes into play because we know Joseph Smith lied to Emma about his polygamy. He married 22 women before he ever told Emma that he was even practicing polygamy. We've got the Fanny Alger adultery thing. We we've got the Kirtland Bake scandal. We've got the Book of Abraham problems. So, if you add to these examples that you highlight of Joseph being willing to commit overt fraud with him admitting to his father-in-law that he never saw any treasure to begin with, if you then add to it other accounts of him perpetrating fraud, plus all the other examples in the history, it's really clear that Joseph Smith was willing to engage in deceptive or fraudulent behavior. It's kind of it's it's inarguable, right? this point that Mike makes that the the feather would have been disintegrated I think is really important because I think uh apologists today will use that example of Josiah Stol and I think it's from the court case when Josiah stole is actually you know vouching for Joseph and saying well he actually can see you know can see treasure uh or you know because we we dig and we found a feather we didn't find the treasure but we found the feather that he said we would find um but the fact that it would have been disintegrated if it would was really there. I mean, it's a good point because I heard too many apologists saying, "Well, they actually found the feather. That proves that Joseph actually had powers." Yeah. Yeah. I think it's important. So, I think now we're on to the apologetic stuff. And um and so, so you have a slide on how it impacts the modern Oh, yeah. Let's do this real quick. So, this is something that you got to keep in mind because when you think of of the way folk magic worked and how Joseph Smith practiced it, we have elements that into the church today. So every Sunday when they get up and they give their prayer before the sacrament, if it's not said exactly right, they have to start over. And that is from folk magic because the belief is if you don't say it right, exactly right, it loses its power. If you baptize someone and not every single hair is underwater, they believe that the ritual of baptism is not going to have the power that it needs. And um you know, we obviously I'm not going to get into temple stuff, but the temple has stuff like that, too, where you have to do it exactly right or else we believe it doesn't hold the power. That all comes out of folk magic. And so every Sunday when you sit down and take the sacrament, you are engaging in at least in that the the the prayer beforehand, the blessing that you you're engaging in folk magic. And so I just want to point that out because we often hear, "Oh yeah, folk magic was before the Book of Mormon, totally isolated." It's like, no, no, it impacts us today, even if it's not obviously as as heavy as it would have been. It reminds me of kind of a witch's incantation. You got to follow the steps of the witch's incantation to get the result of the story. Yeah. soon as you get off track, it loses all of its power. So, and and yeah, so you just keep that in mind next time you're in church and you hear that. And this is this is actually something that Richard Bushman, you know, the author of Rster Roller recognizes. He says that the magic worldview informs or kind of like Yeah. prepares. He shows up throughout the restoration. Yep. Yeah. All right. So, we'll go through apologetics. And I'm sorry I'm short changing this one a little bit, but unfortunately I got So, you're you're basically sharing what the apologetic responses might be. Yeah. And so this is actually on the church's site in their gospel uh topics library. It's not a full essay, but um I'm just going to go through it fairly quickly, but what they're saying is that Joseph Smith acknowledges in 1825 that he was um that he he acknowledges after the church is formed that he did um work as a as a money digger with Josiah Stole. And what I just want to point out is that these things only are mentioned by Joseph Smith because of the fact that they're following him. These stories are following and dogging Joseph Smith. He has to address them. So, um, this gospel topic thing is to say, "Look, yeah, Joseph admitted he did it." And what they'll do is they'll say, "Joseiah still hired him. Joseph didn't go to him." And again, we covered it earlier, but they're hiring him because he's getting his he's doing so many digs and he's building this charisma that people believe in, and that's why they seek him out. And so, it's just to point out that saying Joseph admitted to it later is only because these stories are following him wherever he goes. Yeah. Sometimes apologists want to say that he was just he was the digger. Like I remember Rod Meldrum tried to argue that he was the digger. He wasn't the scrier or the the sear. That's another common tactic. Yeah. But again, saying that he admitted it later doesn't necessarily erase the fact that he did it. Is that what you're saying? Exactly. Yeah. Exactly. And so, okay, like I said, I feel bad on his testimony on the trial, he he admits that he was seeing, right? because he says that his eyes hurt anymore and he was trying to convince Josiah still to stop. Yep. Yeah, that's and that Yeah, that's coming up too because that that's another apologetic. Um Okay. And so, um what they talk about is how seeing and Sears were part of the culture and we talked about that earlier. It was part of the culture, but it's it's part of the culture just as over the last like when I I grew up, you know, my my formative years or whatever were in the 90s and Miss Cleo was on TV all the time, you know, and she got sued for fraud. uh crystal ball tellers, tarot card readers, all of these things are part of our worldview. And yet no one's going to go up on in on a Sunday and say, "You guys shall get tarot card readings because we know it's not real." And so again, to say it's part of the culture does not give it any weight as to being a valid true method of finding anything. And and and the church kind of very carefully skirts that in in this gospel um entry. But when they because when they say it was part of the culture, they're not admitting that it was illegal. Yes, disreputable and widely known to be both superstitious folk magic and fraudulent. To say that people do it is just like saying, "Well, people do Ouija boards." Exactly. And other forms of folk magic in 2022. That doesn't make it right and it's not a good excuse. Yeah. And and to put it to a real extreme way, it' be like saying in the I'm trying to think when Al Capone was big, but say in the early 1900s, gangsters were a huge part of the culture. That doesn't make Al Capone a good person. And I'm I'm I I fully acknowledge it's a huge exaggeration. I'm just trying to say making that point only works if it's an acceptable method and it's just not. And we've shown earlier that, you know, people at the time knew it was wrong. So it it doesn't really fix the problem. It just they want members to think, oh, it was normal back then, so don't worry about it. And that's just not how it is. Yeah, that's important. Okay. And then to continue on, this is just talking about we talked about earlier how they believe that there were Spanish treasure deposits and um Josiah Stole hired Joseph and then they they talk about um how uh they Josiah Stole took Joseph's advice to finally give up the hunt. And I just want to point out this is the whole point I was mentioning earlier. These always have an end. Treasure diggings have an ending because you can only dig so far before either the person runs out of money, the person runs out of patience, or you have nowhere else to go. And so um to to say that well Joseph's the one that told him to stop it really doesn't make it better because one he still took money for weeks maybe over a month and two at some point his nephew came in and was take you know filing charges against him. So we don't know it could have been his nephew came in and said he's he's taking advantage of you and Joseph said you know what I I lost it anyways you should stop now. We don't know but to say that implies that Joseph had good intentions and as we've shown with the feather story he clearly was deceiving Josiah stole. So to make that comment without the context is deceptive from that gospel topics entry. Yeah. So to say that that we should give Joseph a break because he was the one that ended the treasure digs. This the scrier or the peeper always ended the treasure digs because he had to he knew that there wasn't going to be treasure. Yeah. So to say that that means that Joseph was somehow on the side of good and truth it's it's misleading. It's misleading. problem. All right. And so, um, we'll continue on. Oh, I think it's good. Okay. So, then they say, um, basically that, you know, it was uncommon, uh, for people to encounter those who claim to have, um, stones to search for lost objects, but it was unheard of, um, to translate an ancient record with one. Uh, Joseph Smith got the power to translate from God, uh, redirecting the use of the Sears stone um towards a work of a spiritual nature. And I just want to point out, it was unheard of for treasure diggers to actually locate anything. So again, this statement gives credibility to treasure digging in order to give credibility to the Book of Mormon translation. And if the first one is untrue, then the second one isn't going to be true. And that's what Hannah Stoddard was saying. Like that is the problem. If if if Joseph Smith was deceiving people in treasure digging, there is no reason to think he wasn't with the translation unless you give special pleading to Joseph Smith. And if you want to do that, then you got to figure out a way to to explain that outside of just saying because I feel it. Because the evidence is telling you that he's using the exact same deception method. Um the one thing I would say is I said this earlier when you do a treasure dig it has an end. It always has an end. Um because you have to produce something tangible. You cannot you you can't keep digging without giving a physical reward, right? And when you create a religion um all of a sudden you can use the same methods of treasure digging but that reward now is something you will never get until you die. And so you could keep that treasure dig, you know, kind of picture the church as being like a spiritual treasure dig in Joseph Smith's time. And you're constantly being told, "Oh, go here, dig here. Go here, dig here." And that might be, you know, um, donate and tithing. It might be go on a mission. And that reward you're dangling over the head instead of it being a treasure chest in the ground. It is eternal. It is after you die. And so I would just point out that that you're you're taking tra Joseph Smith converted treasure digging and found a way to use the same method but instead of needing to present a physical reward, you can always you never have to present it because you can always keep them digging because that rewards after you die. I So So are you saying that the covenant path is a lifelong treasure dig? I mean I think it could be. I'm like, again, I don't think Russell Nelson's thinking of it that way. But I would say that like for Joseph Smith to be able to convert because he realizes he can't keep doing it. He's he's in he's skirting the law. He's going to get in trouble. So to be able to then say, you know what, I can't keep doing it. Treasure digging has an end. But as he creates the Mormon church and starts bringing people in, they are effectively his treasure digging um you know, perspective uh you know um hiring people. And um he can then keep saying, "Okay, keep digging here. here. We're going to dig here. And if you keep doing that, but again, now that the reward's eternal, you don't have you never have to produce anything outside of the only thing you have to produce is keeping them believing that you're in charge. And that's all you have to do at that point. But you have special powers, right? Yep. That's all you need to do is to to make sure they still believe that you are the one with the authority. And then everything else will continue on until they die. And and and I think that's why treasure digging continues. Uh the methods of it continue on as as we'll show in future ones. Um, I mean that's a really profound uh observation Mike and Herardo and you know Jarm writes that's deep and I think it's true. It's basically the the the really essential elements are Joseph Smith claiming to have special powers from God getting people to believe that he has those special powers and then getting them on a treadmill of following him and and giving him money basically. Giving him money. Um, and you know, again, later or obedience or prestige. Yeah. Reputation. Exactly. Exactly. And I've got four minutes. I won't I won't get into that too much. We'll cover that more later, though. I promise. Um, because that that does tie into to the future things as well. Okay. Okay. So, any other final So, Mike, any other final points you want to make from the slides? So, why don't we go through them really fast and then um so the next one is about Richard Bushman and it actually replies to what Hannah had started with, which I thought would have been the perfect book end. Um, so, um, you know, oh yeah, let's do this one really quick. This is really quick. So, Joseph says, um, uh, he answers because these stories follow him. In 1838, he says, "Was Joseph Smith a money digger?" Yes, but it was never a very profitable job for him as he only got $14 a month. Um, so if you go to the next slide, this is the wages for farm laborers in Vermont in 1827. If you'll see it, they make $9 a month. So, basically, Joseph Smith is getting $14 a month to be able to put his rock in a hat. and they are going to make it sound like it's not much money, but he's making over 50% more than the people in his in his area that are doing hard labor. And so that again is an apologetic that they'll use to say, "Well, he didn't make much of it, so you shouldn't worry about it." But he's making over 50% more than people who are doing honest work on a farm. And so I think you have to again put that into context when people make that apologetic. He was making way more money than he would have doing doing typical farm labor at the time. Yeah. And it wasn't as hard. It wasn't as difficult. Wouldn't you much rather tell people where to dig than to be doing the digging and the hulling and the planting and the weeding yourself? That slide is is is amazing because I've heard that argument so many times from apologists saying, "Oh, he only made $14 a month and if we put it in today's context, oh, like you know that that's nothing." But yeah, seeing the wages. Yep. And so, uh, real quick, and maybe what we'll do is we'll cover this a little more at the start of the the gold plates one if people want to hear more. But, so the Hannah Stoddard, um, video at the beginning kind of attacks Richard Bushman's idea that money digging was a way to prepare Joseph Smith to be able to dictate the Book of Mormon because he God needed someone who believed in the magical worldview, or else he wouldn't have been able to get someone to believe that when an angel came down, it was a real angel. And we'll save most of that for next time just because of my my schedule kind of bumping up. But you know the one thing I would say is that this shows us the lengths you have to go to in order to make this work because you would have never made this argument if he didn't wasn't a treasure digger. And this is only out of necessity. It's not because this is what the church the church won't even really say this unless they're pushed into it. Um because you have to believe like again and I realize the the response will be you can't say how God works. But if I'm laying in bed and an angel comes down and starts talking to me, whether or not I was doing treasure digging, I'm not I'm going to believe it. You know what I mean? And so this idea that you can't that God needed basically someone who was deceiving people through treasure digging, it doesn't work. And it only comes out of necessity. And Mike, what we're going to do, I'm going to go and read your slides after you take off. Okay. Um because I think your conclusions are really valuable. Okay. Cool. Really important. But Mike, I just want to thank you. um you know that I'm really looking forward to this series. You've helped me and Jen and Herardo understand things about treasure digging and and we've been studying this stuff for a long time. So Mike, you're this was really valuable today. Your website LDS discussions has helped so many people. We're really glad to be able to promote it. And then I'll just say, Mike, I really hope that we can have you back to follow on the other 40 or 50 or 60 topics and and listeners and viewers, we hope that you will email us or comment or uh support us so that Mike will feel motivated to want to come back. So please send Mike please email us or comment with your positive feedback uh and and Mike will get the motivation and the incentive that he needs to continue this project. Yeah. So, the only thing I'll say before I go, um, for anyone who's watching or listening, please email John or email me, um, and let us know if this is too long, too short, if you feel like we're going it because I can do these overview projects. I want to cater them to be the most helpful. The whole point of doing this was to find a way to put it in a perspective that made sense to me so it can help others. So, if there's um some suggestions you have on on how to make this better, please do because like John said, we might end up doing a bunch of them. So, if you have some suggestions, we can take them in and because, you know, this is kind of a trial run and then we'll try to make it better and we'll try to make sure um that we're doing it in a way that's informative to you. And if you're a believer, I hope I know this is uncomfortable, but I hope this is being done in a way that doesn't feel quite as in your face as maybe sometimes like reading the CS letter sometimes can feel like you're being punched because all this information right in your face at once. And I'm hoping by doing this you can kind of understand it in more of a gentle way. Um and and to help make sense of it and and um so just please give us feedback and and thank you all so much and thanks for all of the very nice comments and uh I really do appreciate it. All right. Well, Mike, you go take care of your family stuff and we'll we'll finish up. Thank you so much. Bye guys. Talk to you all later. Thanks again. We'll see you back hopefully more stories really soon. Thanks. Of course. Bye guys. Um really really quickly I think it makes sense to go ahead and finish off the slides. So I'm going to go ahead and read them um because Mike's already done the work. So he talked about uh Richard Bushman's defense uh that that Joseph's money digging prepared him for uh you know as a way for him to explore his prophetic powers. Uh, I remember reading that argument first in Joseph Smith and the beginnings of early Mormonism, which was Richard Bushman's predecessor to Roughstone rolling, and I I really like what um, you know, what what Mike gives as the response. He says Joseph Smith's he says Richard Bushman's defense comes out of necessity, not because of the evidence. This argument would make sense if Joseph was able to locate any buried treasure to show a growing divine power, but he never located treasure and ran into legal trouble. So again, if Joseph was truly experimenting with the peep stone in the hat to practice his godly powers, then he would have at some point found something. But he didn't. And that's that's the point Mike is making. Mike goes on to write, "To make this argument work, you have to believe that there is really actual literal buried treasure that is protected by guardian spirits that becomes slippery and sinks into the ground. If you don't believe in this, and there is absolutely no reason to believe that anyone would, then you have to believe in a trickster god that makes Joseph Smith think he could see these treasures to prepare him, which also makes absolutely no sense and would be indistinguishable from outright fraud. So again, if if Joseph's talking to God, if Joseph is communicating with the divine through the sear stone, all God would have need to do is say, "Hey, Joseph, through the peep stone, there's no treasure here. Stop looking and don't waste your time. Don't soil your reputation, being involved in these illegal, fraudulent treasure digs where no treasure is found." God could have just simply communicated that to Joseph through the sear stone, which he didn't. And that's a really important point for Mike. So Mike gives us some conclusions that we think are worth reading. Mike writes, "We have a lot of overview topics on the Book of Mormon to come, but understanding Joseph Smith's role in money and treasure digging is important because it finds its way into every aspect of the Book of Mormon, whether it's obtaining the plates, translating the text, or the actual text itself." And this is the quote that I referenced previously that Mike concludes with. This is from Helaleman chapter 13 in the actual Book of Mormon itself. Treasure digging it makes it into the text of the Book of Mormon. quote, "And behold, the time cometh that he cursseth your riches, and they become slippery, that ye cannot hold them. And in the days um of your poverty, you cannot retain them. Yay, we have hid up our treasures, and they have slipped away from us because of the curse of the land." Yay, in that day ye shall say, "Oh, that we had remembered the Lord our God in the day that he gives us our riches, and then they would not have become slippery, that we should lose them. For behold, our riches are gone from us." Now, Jen, I don't know uh if this is true for you, but for me, the fact that slippery treasure makes it into the text of the Book of Mormon, to me, that kind of taints or pollutes the Book of Mormon. Yeah. There's a lot of things that the treasure digging taints. Yeah. Um the whole Book of Mormon, the whole story, everything really. But Heliman Yeah. Yeah. the wording, everything. And you don't understand it till you understand it. Yeah. And so what Mike's overall work does is it puts everything, it's like he said at the very beginning of today's episode, it puts all the puzzle pieces together in their proper place. And by seeing all the puzzle pieces, um, you know, it it all of a sudden starts to make perfect sense. I used to say for the church to be true, you have to have a million complicated, distorted, backbending, almost backbreaking explanations for a million things that don't make sense. But if all of a sudden you look at all of this as well, maybe it wasn't true. And then you look at the secular secular explanations, you have a million reasonable sense sensible explanations that make everything make sense. It all makes sense if it's not true. You know what I mean? Yeah, I do. Yeah. It does. Yeah. It's hard. Yeah. Uh the final slide that we'll add that Mike writes is in order to believe the Book of Mormon is an ancient historical record, you have to believe that there is buried treasure that can slip into the ground. Furthermore, then you have to believe that people in the ancient Americas were experiencing the same treasure digging as Joseph Smith in the 1820s with the same problem of treasure slipping away because the practice is written into the Book of Mormon. As Mike mentioned earlier, this is the first piece of the puzzle and everything to come will lead back to this puzzle piece. Without treasure digging, there is no story of gold plates. And without the gold plate story, there is no Book of Mormon. And again, uh it's all there. Treasure digging. You've got the sear. You've got the seer who's got special powers with the sear stone. You've got treasure buried in the ground. You've got a guardian or an angel guarding the treasure. You've got slippery treasure that gets taken away. And you have gullible followers that believe that the seer um has p special powers. And you've got these special objects with powers and you've got the followers believing that the seir has special powers um following him to the end. And whenever the prophecies don't come true, Jen, what do we have, you know, in in in the plan of salvation? I don't know. Well, you've got the followers. We got the blame reversal. Yeah. Exactly. You've got the followers believing that if the prophecy doesn't come true, what? That it's their fault. It's their fault. And I think that like bringing it like full circle um back to like us here now in this day. Um like I have written down here like I took a a couple notes but um it was XMO Candle Company. Mhm. Um earlier she um I don't know if it's um who it was, sorry um who wrote that, but um they were saying that their infertility um every time they left the infertility clinic and they weren't pregnant because of whatever was taught to them, it was their fault. It was their fault that they um they weren't faithful enough to get pregnant. they weren't, you know, faithful enough for the blessings of being a parent. And like these are things like now day, like in our day that using this same concept they are putting on back onto the people and to do some that to someone who's in that space is just cruel. It's just cruel. It's just so wrong in so many ways. And I just want to tell them that I'm so sorry that that happened to you and I'm so sorry that that was put on you, that that was your fault and there was something wrong with you. There's nothing wrong with you. Yeah. And that's why Herardo made that point that kind of the covenant path or the plan of salvation is kind of it's it's kind of analogous to these treasure diggers following uh an alleged, you know, prophet or seer. But but whenever the treasure is not found, the happiness, the joy that we're all seeking after, we just blame ourselves and then continue bowing our head and following the sear. Yeah. And to that same like I'm getting into a whole another subject so I'll make it brief but that same subject with the um XMO candle company is that like then they put into their their website like their book you know that the the church follows or whatever now the bishops follow that um they discourage yes handbook of instructions. They discourage you using infertility treatment like they you know And like to there it's just this game they're playing like shame them, you know, make it their fault their faith isn't strong enough, but then tell them they can't they can't do anything about it. And it puts them in this like spiral of like not being good enough, not, you know, feeling like they're whole. And and then then there's these people that are way off way off on their rocker. I don't know what the word is, but that say like then you must have done something wrong in the pre-existence to to not to be infertile here. Like I've heard so many such damning wrong things said to people by people who are true believing or who feel like they have this patriarchal power or even women saying to other women to be honest. And it's just sad. It's just sad where this all came from. It's sad that we continue this narrative right now. And to all those that this happened to, you are enough. You're whole the way you are. you are loved and um go go within for guidance. That's that would be what I would say to you. And we love you. I love it. And uh thank you. Thank you, Jen. And I just want to say how happy, Jen, I am that you have joined us here on Mormon Stories and the Open Stories Foundation. And my gratitude is echoed by, you know, Maven. Maven writes, "Jen brings so much heart to the show." Uh David writes, "Jen's uh beautifully human reaction to this reminds us, you know, I I'll I'll edit David a little bit. I David writes how evil the brethren are." I would just say how misleading the church has been and how harmful these deceptions have been um over time. And and so yeah, that's that's why we do this. We don't do this to to teach people not to believe. We don't do this to take people out of the church. We do this because uh knowing the truth allows people to make informed decisions and not knowing the truth can cause so much harm. And that's why we're doing the show and that's why we're having Mike and LDS discussions on. Um a real quick shout out to Janice Taylor who made a super chat donation. Those of you who are following us on YouTube, uh we welcome you to make donations on YouTube. Those donations help uh pay for Herardo and Jen and me and this equipment and the Open Stories Foundation. So, thanks to everyone who makes those donations. You can also donate through Facebook through the stars feature. That's another way to donate. And then, of course, you can always go to mormanstories.org, click on the donate button at the top of the page, and become a monthly donor. So, if you I'll just end by saying this. If you like Mike and LDS discussions, if you want to see this series continue, if you want to see uh Mormon stories, us cover more truth claims in a series, we would love your your email at mormstories@gmail.com. We would love your comments at mormontories.org or here on YouTube or on Facebook or elsewhere. And we would love your financial support. And we will bring Mike back for 30 to 40 to 50 more episodes. How about you, Jen? Would you could can your heart stand another 30 or 40 or 50 episodes for Mike? Yes. Yes, it it definitely can. I I don't uh I don't know. I can't say I won't cry in them, but or something won't hit me that I I don't know. But um this is so so good and I love all the all the truth, all the facts that we can find that he places in in one small episode, one one shorter episode that um people will um hopefully be able to listen to and to really get facts and and look at things for themselves because we really want you to look at things for yourself. I love it. I'll end by saying please go to the show notes where you can find a link to LDS discussions. You can find a link to Mike's treasure digging uh essay on LDS discussions. You can also go to mormontories.org. There's truth claims essays about um treasure digging you can find there authored by Mike Brown. And we have that amazing um list by by Mark and Aaron Elwood of 41 treasure digs. uh that Joseph Smith was involved in and and we'll include a link to this spreadsheet as well that shows the 41 treasure digs that Mark and Erin Elwood um have identified. And then of course uh we want uh to shout out to the Glass Liquor um graphic novel that Mark and Aaron Elwood have so graciously uh produced. It's an amazing book and we hope everyone will buy it and we'll include a link to the Glass Liquor book um on uh on in the show notes. And then I'm just going to end as I began. I'm very proud to be wearing the Be a Menace t-shirt that comes from the Black Menaces uh the the African-American BYU students that are doing amazing work. Please check out Black Menaces on Tik Tok or on uh Instagram. Uh they're doing amazing work at BYU. And of course, check out uh Chelsea Homer's Lost and Found Club and Mindy Glad Hills Madam Bandit new album that's coming out. And um yeah, thanks just for joining us today. And Jen, thanks again for joining us and being uh the audio and video producer for this episode. We couldn't do it without you. You're welcome. Thanks everybody. And we'll thank Herardo who had to leave. Uh thanks Herardo for making this happen as well. And again, thanks to Mike at LDS Discussions. Love you guys. Thanks for the support. Please uh thanks to everyone who provided comments, your support through Facebook and YouTube, by subscribing to our channel, by putting the bell on so you're alerted to new episodes, by commenting, by sharing this episode, by giving us positive reviews. We're getting negative reviews on Apple Podcasts or on Spotify from people that have never even bothered to listen to the episode. They're literally just haters that want to bring down our review average. So, if any of you want to help us, please go to Apple Podcast right now. Please go to Spotify or the Mormon Stories podcast Facebook page and just give us a fivestar positive review. That helps drown out the negative reviews. Haters have brought down our um our our Apple podcast rating from 4.9 to 4.8 eight just by onestar reviews given by people that just hate us because we tell the truth. So, we would love to bring back our rating to 4.9 if if any of you will go to Apple Podcasts or Spotify right now and give us a fivestar positive review. All right, everybody. Uh come back Thursday. Our next episode is going to be Sandra Tanner where we conclude our three-part series on Doctrine of Covenant section 132. Um that's been an amazing series. We're going to uh finish that out covering polygamy and plural marriage DNC 132. Look for the live stream on Thursday for that. And we've got many, many great, fantastic episodes in the days, weeks, and months ahead here on Mormon Stories Podcast. So, please stay tuned. Please continue to support us. We love you guys. And we'll see you guys all again soon on another episode of Mormon Stories Podcast. Take care, everybody.